Skip to main content

Kronecker Extensions and Star Operations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Manis Valuations and Prüfer Extensions II

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mathematics ((LNM,volume 2103))

  • 650 Accesses

Abstract

The all over idea of the present chapter is to associate to any ring extension AR a commuting square of ring extensions such that B is Prüfer in T and there exists a process vv which associates with v in a suitable family \(\mathfrak{M}\) of valuations of R over A a special valuation v of T over B such that v j = v. (“Over A” means that A v A.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Semistar operation” here has another meaning than in the classical literature, cf. Comments, p. 139.

  2. 2.

    In [Vol. I, Chap. III §3] we only aimed at giving some interesting examples of BM-valuations, and thus have been more brief than now.

  3. 3.

    v(I) had been defined in Sect. 1.

  4. 4.

    We call any valuation equivalent to v | H for some convex subgroup H of Γ with H ⊃ c v (Γ) a primary specialization of v (cf. [HK] for this terminology).

  5. 5.

    X∕1 denotes the image of X in \(R(X,\mathcal{G})\) under the map \(j_{\mathcal{G}}^{{^\prime}}\).

  6. 6.

    Recall that T denotes the group of units of T.

  7. 7.

    In most of the literature I δ is denoted by I v or I v (the “v-operation”). We refuse to use the letter v here, since all too often in our book v denotes a valuation.

  8. 8.

    In most of the literature an additive notation is chosen and the order relation is reversed: 0 = A is the neutral element; I ≤ J iff I ⊃ J.

  9. 9.

    Below (Definition 6) we will introduce a subgroup of \(\tilde{D}_{{\ast}}(A,R)\) conisting of star invertible “fractional ideals”, for which we reserve the notation D (A, R).

  10. 10.

    Notice that L is not an ideal of A in the usual sense.

  11. 11.

    In much of the literature the word “complete” is used instead of “convex”. We are afraid of conflict with the topological meaning of “complete”. (Any family Φ of valuations on R gives a uniform topology on R.)

  12. 12.

    Recall that for H ∈ J(B,T) we use R ∩ H as an abbreviation of \({\varphi }^{-1}(H)\) , and that IB means \(\varphi (I)B\).

  13. 13.

    A notable exception is the axiom St4′ which may loose its sense, since in general \(\mathcal{G}\) may not contain enough principal ideals.

References

  1. D. Anderson, M. Fontana, M. Zafrullah, Some remarks on Prüfer ∗-multiplication domains and class groups. J. Algebra 319, 272–295 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Bourbaki, Algebrè Commutative, Chap. 1–7 (Hermann, Paris, 1961–1965)

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Fontana, K.A. Loper, Kronecker function rings: a general approach, in Ideal Theoretic Methods in Commutative Algebra, ed. by D.D. Anderson, I.J. Papick. Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 220 (Marcel Decker, New York, 2001), pp. 189–205

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Gabelli, G. Picozza, Star stable domains. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 208, 853–866 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Gilmer, Multiplicative Ideal Theory (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1972)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Halter-Koch, Kronecker function rings and generalized integral closures. Commun. Algebra 31, 45–59 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Halter-Koch, Ideal Systems; An Introduction to Multiplicative Ideal Theory (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Huber, M. Knebusch, On valuation spectra. Contemp. Math. 155, 167–206 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. J.A. Huckaba, Commutative Rings with Zero Divisors (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. L. Kronecker, Grundzüge einer arithmetischen Theorie der algebraischen Größen. J. Reine Angew. Math. 92, 1–122 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Mertens, Über einen algebraischen Satz. S.-B. Akad. Wiss. Wien (2a) 101, 1560–1566 (1892)

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Nagata, Local Rings (Interscience Publ./Wiley, New York, 1962)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. B. van der Waerden, Algebra, Zweiter Teil (Springer, Berlin, 1959)

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Weyl, Algebraic Theory of Numbers (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1940)

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Zafrullah, t-invertibility and Bazzoni-like statements. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 214, 654–657 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knebusch, M., Kaiser, T. (2014). Kronecker Extensions and Star Operations. In: Manis Valuations and Prüfer Extensions II. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol 2103. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03212-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics