Skip to main content

Why Organizational Innovations Are Adopted

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management Innovation

Abstract

Widespread agreement exists for the need to improve innovation in organizations. Despite significant steps forward, inefficiencies remain and little has been accomplished in understanding how innovation can overcome these. Current research focuses on organizational innovations. Here we focus on organizational innovations’ objectives and adoption. The analysis is based on a sample of 10,796 Spanish businesses. Measures of organizational innovations and innovation objectives are based on the Oslo Manual. Statistical tests find a dynamic behavior in organizations, since 41.5 % have accomplished some organizational innovation in the period 2007–2009. Results reveal the real relation between organizational innovation objectives and adoption, with improving innovation skills being the most influential organizational innovation objective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albers JA, Brewer S (2003) Knowledge management and the innovation process: the eco-innovation model. J Knowl Manage Pract 4(3):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster H, Bikfalvi A, Kinkel S, Lay G (2008) Organizational innovation: the challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys. Technovation 28(10):644–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman R, Maidique MA, Wheelwright SC (2001) Strategic management of technology and innovation. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chau P, Tam K (1997) Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: an exploratory study. MIS Q 21(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour F (2010) An integration of research findings of effects of firm size and market competition on product and process innovations. Br J Manage 21(4):996–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green W (2000) Econometric analysis. Prentice-Hall, New York/Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan J, Yam R, Tang E, Lau A (2009) Innovation strategy and performance during economic transition: evidences in Beijing, China. Res Policy 38(5):802–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W (2006) Multivariate data analysis, 6th edn. Prentice-Hall, New York/Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang HG, Chang I, Chen F, Wu S (2008) Investigation of the application of KMS for diseases classifications: a study in a Taiwanese hospital. Expert Syst Appl 34(1):725–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotabe M, Murray J (1990) Linking product and process innovations and modes of international sourcing in global competition: a case of foreign multinational firms. J Int Bus Stud 21(3):383–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leidner D, Preston D, Chen D (2010) An examination of the antecedents and consequences of organizational IT innovation in hospitals. J Strateg Inf Syst 19(3):154–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiponen S, Helfat CE (2010) Innovation objectives, knowledge sources, and he benefits of breadth. Strateg Manage J 31(2):224–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao S, Wu C (2010) System perspective of knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational innovation. Expert Syst Appl 37(2):1096–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Nicolás C, Meroño-Cerdán AL (2011) Strategic knowledge management, innovation and performance. Int J Inf Manage 31(6):502–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagelkerke N (1991) A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78(3):691–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD/Statistical Office of the European Communities (2005) Oslo manual: guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd edn, The measurement of scientific and technological activities. OECD Publishing, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubalcaba L, Gallego J, Hertog P (2010) The case of market and system failures in services innovation. Serv Ind J 30(4):549–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Chien S (2006) Forecasting innovation performance via neural networks – a case of Taiwanese manufacturing industry. Technovation 26(5–6):635–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Hsiao S (2009) Mechanisms of developing innovative IT-enabled services: a case study of Taiwanese healthcare service. Technovation 29(5):327–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angel Luís Meroño-Cerdán .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Meroño-Cerdán, A.L., López-Nicolás, C. (2014). Why Organizational Innovations Are Adopted. In: Hervás-Oliver, JL., Peris-Ortiz, M. (eds) Management Innovation. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03134-7_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics