Abstract
This chapter explores the links between economics and ethics, which depend on the notion of economics considered. Political economy is a science of ends—a practical and moral, science, while economic theory is a technique that should be subordinated to the former. Economic theory cannot be specifically applied to reality without a commitment to values. In the twentieth century, economics tried to push values aside, but it is drawing closer to them today, following the lead of other social sciences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It should be clear that normativity on its own does not necessarily imply an ethical character. We can consider both ethical normativity and other kinds of normativities (technical, aesthetic, etc.). The use of the term “normativity” among economists, however, has tended to have ethical implications.
- 2.
For example, Lawson (2003, pp. 22ff).
- 3.
For an excellent review on the history and different aspects involved in the value-free discussion, see Harold Kincaid, John Dupré and Alison Wylie (2007). Hilary Putnam and Vivian Walsh (eds.), (2012), contains a collection of essays by them and Sen, Nussbaum and Harvey Gram also on this topic.
- 4.
Similarly, Robbins (1935, p. 150) stated, “If we disagree about ends it is a case of thy blood or mine—or live and let live, according to the importance of the difference, or the relative strength of our opponents”.
- 5.
For example, John L. Austin’s claimed that “The familiar contrast of “normative or evaluative” as opposed to the factual is in need, like so many dichotomies, of elimination. J.L. Austin, How to Do Things with Words, 1962, Lecture XII, p. 149.
- 6.
Several authors have pointed to the anachronism or old-fashioned view of economics, which continues to assume the same outdated propositions—more than fifty years overdue, in fact—in the philosophy of science: cf. e. g., Walsh (1987, pp. 862, 868).
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
It should be noted that Aristotle’s thoughts on freedom are not as clear as his other notions. For him, the place for exercising freedom would be the polis. I thank an anonymous referee for making this point.
References
Crespo, Ricardo F. 2000. Liberalismo económico y libertad. Ortodoxos y Heterodoxos en las Teorías económicas actuales. Madrid: Rialp.
Crespo, Ricardo F. 2006b. La libertad en Hayek. Libertas, XIII/45, October 2006, 25–33.
Crespo, Ricardo F. 2014. A re-assessment of Aristotle’s economic thought. London: Routledge.
Halteman, James, and Edd Noell. 2012. Reckoning with Markets. Moral reflection in economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hausman, Daniel, and Michael McPherson. 1996. Economic analysis and moral thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kincaid, Harold, John Dupré and Alison Wylie. 2007. Value-free Science? Ideals and Illusions. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lawson, Tony. 2003. Reorienting economics. London: Routledge.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2011. Where we were, where we are, where we need to be. In Virtue and politics. Alasdair MacIntyre’s revolutionary aristotelianism, eds. P. Blackledge and K. Knight, 307–334. Notre Dame (Indiana): University of Notre Dame Press.
Mill, John Stuart. [1843] 1974. Essays on Some Unsettled Questions Of Economic Science, Essay V, “On the Definition of Political Economy and the Method of Investigation proper to it”, Augustus M. Kelley (Reprints), Clifton, 1974.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2003a. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics 9(2-3): 33–59.
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2003b. Tragedy and Human Capabilities: a response to Vivian Walsh. Review of Political Economy 15/3: 413-8, 415-6.
Polanyi, Karl. 1971. Aristotle discovers economy. In Essays of Karl Polanyi, ed. George Dalton. Boston: Beacon Press.
Polanyi, Karl. [1944] 1983. La grande transformation. Paris: Gallimard (The Great Transformation, New York, 1944).
Putnam, Hilary. 2004. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge (Mass.) and London (Third edition): Harvard University Press.
Putnam, Hillary, and Vivian Walsh (eds.). 2012. The End of value-free economics. London and New York: Routledge.
Rescher, Nicholas. 1988. Rationality. A philosophical inquiry into the nature and the rationale of reason. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Robbins, Lionel. 1935. Essay on the nature and significance of economic science, Second Edition. London: MacMillan.
Rudner, Richard. 1953. The Scientist qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments. Philosophy of Science, 20/1, pp. 1–6.
Sen, Amartya. 1987. On Ethics and Economics, Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Sen, Amartya. 1999. Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 2002. Rationality and Freedom, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge (Mass).
Sen, Amartya. 2004. Dialogue Capabilities, Lists, and Public Reason: Continuing the Conversation. Feminist Economics, 10-3, pp. 77–80.
Sen, Amartya. 2005. Walsh on Sen after Putnam. Review of Political Economy, 17/1, pp. 107–113.
Van Staveren, Irene. 2001. The Values of Economics: An Aristotelian Perspective. London: Routledge.
Walsh, Vivian. 1987. Philosophy and Economics. In The New Palgrave. A Dictionary of Economics, eds. John Eatwell, Murray Milgate, and Peter Newman Vol. 3, 861–9, MacMillan, London
Wilber, Charles K. 1998. Economics and ethics. In The Handbook of Economic Methodology John, eds. B. Davis, D. Wade Hands and Uskali Mäki, 138–141. Cheltenham and Northampton: Elgar.
Yuengert, Andrew. 2004. The Boundaries of technique. Ordering positive and normative concerns in economic researc. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Yuengert, Andrew. 2012. Approximating prudence: Aristotelian practical wisdom and economic models of choice. New York: Palgrave-MacMillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crespo, R.F. (2013). Economics and Ethics. In: Philosophy of the Economy. SpringerBriefs in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02648-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02648-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02647-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02648-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)