Skip to main content

Abstract

We introduce a measure for riskiness which is able, at the same time, to let the investor accepting/rejecting gambles in a way as objective as possible (i.e. depending only on the probabilistic features of the gamble), and to take his own risk posture into account, that is by considering the risk attitude expressed by his utility function. We will briefly recall and discuss some theoretical properties, and we will give proof of our results by ranking 30 largest-growth mutual funds; finally, we will compare the results with those of other indexes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arrow, K.J.: Alternative approaches to the theory of choice in risk-taking situations. Econom. 19, 404–37 (1951)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.M., Heath, D.: Coherent Measures of Risk. Math. Fin. 9(3) 203–228 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Aumann, R., Serrano, R.: An economic index of riskiness. J. Polit. Ec. 116(5), 810–836 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bao, Y.: Estimation risk-adjusted Sharpe ratio and fund performance ranking under a general return distribution. J Fin. Econom. 7, 152–173 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barndorff-Nielsen, O.E.: Normal inverse Gaussian distributions and stochastic volatility modelling. Scandin J Stat. 24, 1–13 (1997)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bollerslev, T., Kretschmer, U., Pigorsch, C, Tauchen, G.: A discrete-time model for daily S&P 500 returns and realized variations: jumps and leverage effects. J Econom. 150, 151–166(2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Foster, D.P., Hart, S.: An Operational Measure of Riskiness. J. Polit. Ec. 117(5), 785–814 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hart, S.: Comparing Risks by Acceptance and Rejection. J. Polit. Ec. 119(4), 617–638 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Homm, U., Pigorsch, C.: An operational interpretation and existence of the Aumann-Serrano index of riskiness. Ec Lett 114(3), 265–267 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Homm, U., Pigorsch, C.: Beyond the Sharpe Ratio: An Application of the Aumann-Serrano Index to Performance Measurement. J. Bank Finance (2012). http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.04.005

    Google Scholar 

  11. Morgan, J.P.: RiskMetrics Technical Document. Morgan Guarantee trust Company (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jia, J., Dyer, J.S., Butler, J.C.: Measures of Perceived Risk. Manag Sc 45, 519–532 (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Luce, R.D.: Several possible measures of risk. Theor. Dec. 12, 217–228 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Luce, R.D.: Several possible measures of risk. Correction. Theor. Dec. 13, 381 (1981)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kendall, M.: A New Measure of Rank Correlation Biometrika 30(1–2), 81–89 (1938)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Marina, M.E., Resta, M.: On some measures for riskiness. Proc XVIII Conf on Risk Theory, Campobasso (5 September 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marina, M.E., Resta, M.: A generalization of the Aumann-Serrano index of riskiness: theoretical results and some applications, submitted (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Markowitz, H.M.: Portfolio Selection. J. Fin. 7, 77–91 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Markowitz, H.M.: Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investment. Yale University Press. New Haven, USA (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pflug, G.C.: Some remarks on the value-at-risk and the conditional value-at-risk. In: Uryasev, S.P. (ed.) Probabilistic Constrainted Optimization: Methodology and Applications, MA, pp. 278–287. Kluwer, Norwell (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pratt, J.: Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large. Econom. 32(1, 2), 122–136 (1964)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Rockafellar, R.T., Uryasev, S., Zabarankin, M.: Generalized deviations in risk analysis. Fin. Stoch. 10, 51–74 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Schultze, K., Existence and Computation of the Aumann-Serrano Index of Riskiness. Working Paper. McMaster University (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schultze, K.: Risk Measures Respecting Comparative Risk Aversion. Working Paper. McMaster University (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shalit, H.: Measuring Risk in Israeli Mutual Funds: Conditional Value-at-Risk vs. Aumann-Serrano Riskiness Index. Working paper Ben-Gurion. University of the Negev (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sharpe, W.F.: Mutual fund performance. J Busin 39, 119–138 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharpe, W.F.: The Sharpe ratio. J. Port. Man. 21, 49–58 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stone, B.K.: A General Class of Three-Parameter Risk Measures. J. Fin. 28, 675–685 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tobin, J.: Liquidity Preference as a Behavior Toward Risk. Rev. Ec. Stud. 25, 65–86 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Resta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marina, M.E., Resta, M. (2014). Investment Rankings via an Objective Measure of Riskiness: A Case Study. In: Corazza, M., Pizzi, C. (eds) Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02499-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics