Skip to main content

The Methodological Approach to Process Analysis for Robotic Surgical Procedures: The Experience of SAFROS and I-SUR Projects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Care Systems Engineering

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 61))

  • 1286 Accesses

Abstract

This work presents two methodological approaches followed for two distinct contexts of surgical robotics. The IRIS Unit of Fondazione Centro San Raffaele (Milano, Italy) is involved in two research projects related to robotic surgery, dealing with different purposes, procedures and technologies, thus requiring different approaches to knowledge formalization and process analysis. The first project, SAFROS – Patient Safety in Robotic Surgery, aims to improve patient safety for robotic surgery and a systemic approach has been adopted, in order to take into account several aspects related to the surgical procedure, from the device to the process itself and the whole environmental organization. The second project, I-SUR – Intelligent Surgical Robotics, aims at automatizing three basic surgical gestures with specific procedural constraints and targets. A goal-based approach has been chosen to analyze the process, extrapolate the operational workflow and setting the requirements for the underlying technological system. Both in SAFROS and I-SUR, safety for the patient and acceptability for the surgeons, considered as “final users” of such innovations, have taken a key role for the approach to process improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    FMEA is a proactive risk assessment tool used to identify potential vulnerabilities in complex, high-risk processes and to generate remedial actions before the process results in adverse events [5].

References

  1. Kumar, S.: Modeling hospital surgical delivery process design using system simulation: optimizing patient flow and bed capacity as an illustration. Technol. Health Care 19, 1–20 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morandi, A., Verga, M., Oleari, E., Gasperotti, L., Fiorini, P.: A methodological framework for the definition of patient safety measures in robotic surgery: the experience of SAFROS project. Intelligent autonomous systems 12. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 194, 155–164 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) and Australasian Association of Cancer Registries (AACR): Cancer in Australia: an overview (2008). Cancer series no. 46. Cat. no. CAN 42. AIHW, Canberra (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Murphy et al.: Robotic technology in surgery: current status in 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations –JCAHO – Standard LD 5.2

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bonfè, M., Boriero, F., Dodi, R., Fiorini, P., Morandi, A., Muradore, R., Pasquale, L., Sanna, A., Secchi, C.: Towards automated surgical robotics: a equirements engineering approach. In: 4th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Permpongkosol, S., Nielsen, M., Solomon, S.: Percutaneous renal cryoablation. Urology 68(1 Suppl.), 19–25 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baresi, L., Pasquale, L., Spoletini, P.: Fuzzy goals for requirements-driven adaptation. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Requirements Engineering Conference. IEEE Computer Society, pp. 125–134 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baresi, L., Pasquale, L.: Live goals for adaptive service compositions. In: Conference SEMS’10. Cape Town, 2–8 May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baresi, L., Pasquale, L.: Adaptation goals for adaptive service-oriented architectures

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Researches leading to the described results have been funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Program FP7/2007–2013 under grant agreement n. 248960 (SAFROS) and n. 270396 (I-SUR). Authors wish also to acknowledge the surgical staffs of San Raffaele Hospital (Milan) and General Hospital G. B. Rossi (Verona) for their support and valuable cooperation to the projects’ research activities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Dodi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dodi, R., Oleari, E., Sanna, A. (2014). The Methodological Approach to Process Analysis for Robotic Surgical Procedures: The Experience of SAFROS and I-SUR Projects. In: Matta, A., Li, J., Sahin, E., Lanzarone, E., Fowler, J. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Care Systems Engineering. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 61. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01848-5_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics