Abstract
Social entrepreneurship as a variant of entrepreneurship is probably only in the beginning of its conceptualization as scientific subfield, and applicable theories are yet to be defined. However, starting from the empirical findings in a global perspective, I find that the phenomenon that could be labelled social or societal entrepreneurship has existed under other synonyms for quite a while. Personally, I find the borderlines between these concepts and social economy, third-sector entrepreneurship, public–private enterprises, and so on, rather blurred. The ambition must nevertheless be to develop the necessary conceptual tools for social entrepreneurship as means for measuring and comparing regional development, for example, in sparsely populated areas. Political entrepreneurship as a concept is comparatively new too, although connotations to earlier political science terms can be noted. The meaning of the term refers to political actions in connection with governance structures in a multi-level perspective, but obviously also has consequences for government in traditional political settings, and the question of accountability. My aim in this chapter is to develop a model for social and political entrepreneurship, and, with a comparison of small municipalities in the Swedish rural peripheries, to be able to find out, whether or not this can cause changes in socio-economic regional development over time. To examine these aspects, I have chosen the number of inhabitants, firms per inhabitants, ranking of municipal entrepreneurship, and employment rate, associations and social capital networks. Tentatively, I expect to find stronger socio-economic development when social and political entrepreneurship is combined over time, as this seems to be a necessary path to combat depopulation and loss of employment and taxation. Five municipalities have been chosen for examination, four in the central Sweden region, and one from the southern Småland region with a strong entrepreneurial tradition, also situated in the periphery, by and large as a bench-marking unit for the comparison. The results confirm that a combination of social and political entrepreneurship is required for the shift of downward trends, as far as Swedish small-sized municipalities in the periphery are concerned.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Pierre, Friedrichs and Vincent in this volume (Chap. 11) use the term community-based entrepreneurship, which is an interesting contribution based on locality and collaborative work between public and private sector. This term could be useful to my own contribution, but I prefer the somewhat wider term social entrepreneurship for its connotation with the third-sector organizations and variety of potential actors in order not to limit the scientific scope of my comparison, and the theoretical coupling around the present state of social entrepreneurship.
- 2.
The average number of inhabitants per km2 is 1, 2, or 4, compared to the bench-marking municipality in Småland, which has 22 inhabitants per km2.
- 3.
References
Bergmann-Winberg, M.-L. von & Nordtug, J. (2006). Municipality branding: cooperation and development in Steinkjer, Sollefteå, Akureyri and Sortland (Notat 2006:4, Steinkjer: Trondelag Forskning og Utvikling).
von Bergmann-Winberg, M.-L., & Wihlborg, E. (Eds.). (2011). Politikens entreprenörer: kreativ problemlösning och förändring. Malmö: Liber.
Bjerke, B. (2005). Förklara eller förstå entreprenörskap?. Malmö: Studentlitteratur.
Borzaga, C., & Santuari, A. (1998). Social enterprises and new employment in europe. Trentino-Alto Adige: European Commission DGV.
Brulin, G. (2002). Faktor X: arbete och kapital i en lokal värld. Stockholm: Atlas.
Granqvist, M. B. (2012). The political entrepreneur as an unconventional problem solver in a northern periphery. In Danson & De Souza (Eds.), Regional development in Northern Europe—peripherality, marginality and border issues (pp. 232–46). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis.
Clark, M. (2009). The social entrepreneur revolution. London: Marshall Cavendish.
Coffé, H., & Geys, B. (2006). Community heterogeneity: a burden for the creation of social capital? Social Science Quarterly, 87(5), 1053–1072.
Confederation of Swedish Enterprise (Svenskt Näringsliv) (2013), Yearly report. (Stockholm).
Dahl, R. (1961). Who governs?. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Danson, M., & de Souza, P. (2012). Regional development in Northern Europe: peripherality, marginality and border issues. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis.
Florida, R. (2003). Cities and creative class. City & Community, 2(1), 3–19.
Freitag, M. (2006). Bowling the state back in: political institutions and the creation of social capital. European Journal of Political Research, 445, 123–152.
Gawell, M., Johannisson, B., & Lundqvist, M. (Eds.). (2009). Entrepreneurship in the name of society. Stockholm: Knowledge Foundation.
Hall, J. C., & Sobel, R. S. (2008). ‘Institutions, entrepreneurship, and regional differences in economic growth’. Southern Journal of Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 69–96.
Herrschel, T. (2012). Regions and regionalisation through business clusters: the roles of territory and network in European and North American city regions. Bradford: Emerald.
Holcombe, R. G. (2002). Political entrepreneurship and the democratic allocation of economic resources’. Review of Austrian Economics, 15(2–3), 143–159.
Johannisson, B. (2005). Entreprenörskapets väsen. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Kiewicz, K. (2007, April). Competitiveness and regions: what is the regional impact of a competitive city?. Paper given at the Regional Studies Association ‘Regions in Focus’ Conference, Lisbon, 2–5.
Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lambooy, J. (2005). Innovation and knowledge: theory and regional policy. European Planning Studies, 13(8), 1137–1152.
Landström, H. (2005). Entreprenörskapets rötter. Malmö: Studentlitteratur.
Lundåsen, S. (2004). En föreningsbaserad demokrati?. Åbo: Åbo Akademis förlag.
Martin, R. (2007). How successful leaders think. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 60–67.
McCaffrey, M., & Salerno, J. T. (2011). A theory of political entrepreneurship. Modern Economy, 2, 552–560.
Nyhlén, S. (2013). Regionalpolitik i förändring: en fallstudie av regionalpolitikens aktörer och former i Åre kommun. Sundsvall: Mid Sweden University.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: CUP.
Parker, R. (2008). Governance and the entrepreneurial economy: a comparative analysis of three regions. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 32(5), 833–854.
Pike, A. (2007, April). Brands, branding and territorial development. Paper given at the Regional Studies Association ‘Regions in Focus’ Conference, Lisbon, 2–5.
Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(15), 1669–1678.
Putnam, R. (1992). Making democracy work. Princeton: PUP.
Schneider, M., & Teske, P. (1992). Toward a theory of the political entrepreneur: evidence from local government. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 737–747.
Skoglund, W. (2005). Samhällsutvecklingsprocesser och entreprenörskap. Östersund: Mid Sweden University.
Swedberg, R. (Ed.). (2008). Schumpeter: om skapande förstörelse och entreprenörskap. Stockholm: Norstedts.
Veggeland, N. (2004). The competitive society—how democratic and effective?. Kristiansand: HøyskoleForlaget.
Wigren, A., Johanson, J., & Schagerström, T. (2003). Näringslivs & tillväxtanalys Sollefteå kommun. Stockholm: Inregia AB.
Wigren, C. (2003). The spirit of Gnosjö: the grand narrative and beyond (JIBS Dissertation Series, 107; Jönköping: Jönköping International Business School).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
von Bergmann-Winberg, ML. (2014). Social and Political Entrepreneurship: Ways and Means to Develop Sparsely Populated Regions?. In: Lundström, A., Zhou, C., von Friedrichs, Y., Sundin, E. (eds) Social Entrepreneurship. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 29. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01396-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01396-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01395-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01396-1
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)