Abstract
The correlations between the outcomes of consecutive measurements are one of those issues so deeply entrenched in the quantum knowledge of physicists that, in many cases, they use them to test the acceptability of any proposal of interpretation of the theory. The aim of the present article is to show the serious obstacles that modal interpretations face when trying to adequately account for those correlations, and to argue that the difficulties can be overcome without giving up the main modal theses if partial traces are dropped but the measuring apparatuses are taken into account.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This was the reaction of Rodolfo Gambini when we explained him the basics of modal interpretations. We are grateful to him for the interesting discussion that followed.
References
Ardenghi, J. S., Castagnino, M., & Lombardi, O. (2009). Quantum mechanics: Modal interpretation and Galilean transformations. Foundations of Physics, 39, 1023–1045.
Ardenghi, J. S., & Lombardi, O. (2011). The modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics as a kind of “atomic” interpretation. Physics Research International, 2011, 379604.
Ballentine, L. (1998). Quantum mechanics: A modern development. Singapore: World Scientific.
Cohen-Tannoudji, C., Diu, B., & Lalöe, F. (1977). Quantum mechanics. New York: Wiley.
d’Espagnat, B. (1976). Conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. Reading: Benjamin.
Dieks, D. (1988). The formalism of quantum theory: an objective description of reality? Annalen der Physik, 7, 174–190.
Dieks, D. (1989). Quantum mechanics without the projection postulate and its realistic interpretation. Foundations of Physics, 38, 1397–1423.
Dieks, D. (1994). Modal interpretation of quantum mechanics, measurements, and macroscopic behavior. Physical Review A, 49, 2290–2300.
Dieks, D. (2007). Probability in modal interpretations of quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 19, 292–310.
Dieks, D., & Vermaas, P. (Eds.). (1998). The modal interpretation of quantum mechanics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Dirac, P. A. M. (1958). The principles of quantum mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Kochen, S. (1985). A new interpretation of quantum mechanics. In P. Mittelstaedt & P. Lahti (Eds.), Symposium on the foundations of modern physics 1985 (pp. 151–169). Singapore: World Scientific.
Laura, R., & Vanni, L. (2008). Conditional probabilities and collapse in quantum measurements. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 47, 2382–2392.
Lombardi, O., & Castagnino, M. (2008). A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39, 380–443.
Lombardi, O., Castagnino, M., & Ardenghi, J. S. (2010). The modal-Hamiltonian interpretation and the Galilean covariance of quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 93–103.
Lombardi, O., & Dieks, D. (2013). Modal interpretations of quantum mechanics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/qm-modal/.
van Fraassen, B. C. (1972). A formal approach to the philosophy of science. In R. Colodny (Ed.), Paradigms and paradoxes: The philosophical challenge of the quantum domain (pp. 303–366). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
van Fraassen, B. C. (1991). Quantum mechanics: An empiricist view. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Vermaas, P., & Dieks, D. (1995). The modal interpretation of quantum mechanics and its generalization to density operators. Foundations of Physics, 25, 145–158.
von Neumann J (1932) Mathematische grundlangen der quantum mechanik. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. English edition: Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics, 1955. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Zurek, W. H. (2003). Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical. Reviews of Modern Physics, 75, 715–776.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ardenghi, J.S., Lombardi, O., Narvaja, M. (2013). Modal Interpretations and Consecutive Measurements. In: Karakostas, V., Dieks, D. (eds) EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science. The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01306-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01306-0_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01305-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01306-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)