Skip to main content

Elements of Linear Elasticity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Elasticity for Geotechnicians

Part of the book series: Solid Mechanics and Its Applications ((SMIA,volume 204))

  • 1744 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we give a short and yet fairly complete exposition of the elemental features of classic elasticity having relevance to our subject matters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more information about the role of \({{\varvec{E}}}\) and, more generally, about the local analysis, both exact and approximate, of a deformation see [11], Chap. I

  2. 2.

    In terms of the vectors composing the orthonormal Cartesian basis we chose, Kronecker’s symbol \(\delta _{ij}\) is given by

    $$\begin{aligned} \delta _{ij}:={{\varvec{e}}}_i \cdot {{\varvec{e}}}_j\!, \end{aligned}$$

    whence

    $$\begin{aligned} \delta _{ij} =\left\{ \begin{array}{lr} 1 \,\mathrm \ if\ \;&{}i=j \\ 0\, \mathrm \ if \ \;&{}i\ne j \end{array}\right. \!\!; \end{aligned}$$

    moreover, relation

    $$\begin{aligned} e_{ijk}:={{\varvec{e}}}_i\times {{\varvec{e}}}_j\cdot {{\varvec{e}}}_k \end{aligned}$$

    defines Ricci’s symbol, so that

    $$\begin{aligned} e_{ijk} = \left\{ \begin{array}{l} +1 \quad \text {if all indices i, j, k are different and, in addition,}\\ \qquad \;\;\text {their sequence is an even-class permutation of 1, 2, 3};\\ \;\mathrm \; \,0 \quad \,\text {if at least two of the indices i, j, k are equal;}\\ -1 \quad \text {if all indices i, j, k are different and, in addition,}\\ \qquad \;\;\text {their sequence is an odd-class permutation of 1, 2, 3}. \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}$$

    Ricci’s and Kronecker’s symbols are linked by the following relation:

    $$\begin{aligned} e_{ijk} e_{lmk} = \delta _{il}\delta _{jm} - \delta _{im}\delta _{jl}. \end{aligned}$$
    (2.5)

    By repeated saturation of pairs of free indices, two easy and often useful consequences of (2.5) are obtained:

    (i) formal multiplication of both sides by \(\delta _{jm}\) yields:

    $$\begin{aligned} e_{ijk} e_{ljk} = 2\,\delta _{il}\,; \end{aligned}$$

    (ii) one more saturation gives:

    $$\begin{aligned} e_{ijk} e_{ijk} = 6\,. \end{aligned}$$
  3. 3.

    Recall that the symbol \(\otimes \) signifies dyadic product, a notion introduced in the first footnote of Sect. 1.3; the second-order tensor \({{\varvec{a}}}\otimes {{\varvec{b}}}\) is defined by specifying its linear action on vectors.

  4. 4.

    That \(\mathrm{curl \,}(\nabla {{\varvec{u}}})= {{\varvec{0}}}\) follows from the definitions of (the two involved operators and) Ricci symbol:

    $$\begin{aligned} (\mathrm{curl \,}(\nabla {{\varvec{u}}}))_{ij}=e_{ipq}(\nabla {{\varvec{u}}})_{jq,p}=e_{ipq}(u_{j,q}),_p=e_{ipq}u_{j,qp}=0. \end{aligned}$$

    Furthermore, in view of (2.4),

    $$\begin{aligned} (\mathrm{curl \,}(\nabla {{\varvec{u}}}^T))_{ij}=e_{ipq}(u_{q,j}),_p=e_{ipq}u_{q,jp}=(e_{ipq}u_{q,p}),_{j}=2\,w_{i,j}. \end{aligned}$$
  5. 5.

    For a proof of this result, which is due to the great Italian elasticist Eugenio Beltrami (1835–1900), who established it in 1889, see [6], Sect. 14, where various other results included in this section are also proved.

  6. 6.

    When Greek indices are used, it is understood that they take the values 1 and 2; the range of Latin indices is the set {1, 2, 3}.

  7. 7.

    It appears that the concept of diffused contact interactions between internal adjacent body parts begun to condensate in Cauchy’s mind on the basis of a similarity with standard examples of diffused contact loads exerted on a body by an environment of a different nature, such as the hydrostatic pressure of a fluid on an immersed solid [3]. Cauchy’s model of internal contact interactions has been applied without changes to contact interactions of a body with its exterior, with the stress-vector mapping accounting for both. An implicit drawback of this practice is that no difference is made between geometrical surfaces obtained by ideal cuttings and fabricated surfaces obtained by actual cuttings [4]; moreover, the issue of boundary compatibility of a (body,environment) pair is completely overlooked [1, 2].

  8. 8.

    The construction of an interaction theory general enough to allow for concentrated contact interactions between adjacent body parts has been undertaken by Schuricht [15, 16]; among the intriguing features of such a theory is the rethinking it involves of the body-part notion. In [14], examples are given of interactions in cuspidate bodies that concentrate at the cusp point, regarded as a body part.

  9. 9.

    The laplacian of a vector field \({\varvec{v}}\) is the vector field that obtains by taking the divergence of the gradient of \({\varvec{v}}\):

    $$\begin{aligned} \varDelta {\varvec{v}}=\mathrm{div \,}(\nabla {\varvec{v}}); \end{aligned}$$

    its Cartesian components have the form just shown because \((\nabla {\varvec{v}})_{ij}=v_{i,j}\) and because, for \({{\varvec{V}}}\) a second-order tensor field, \((\mathrm{div \,}{{\varvec{V}}})_i=V_{ij,j}\).

  10. 10.

    Here, \(\, {{\varvec{S}}}({{\varvec{u}}}):=2\mu {{\varvec{E}}}({{\varvec{u}}})+\lambda (\mathrm{tr \,}{{\varvec{E}}}({{\varvec{u}}})){{\varvec{I}}}\,.\)

  11. 11.

    For example, let us show how the first of (2.54) is arrived at: from (2.33)\(_{1,2}\) we have that

    $$\begin{aligned} S_{11}=\frac{E}{1+\nu } \Big ( E_{11} + \frac{\nu }{1-2\nu }(E_{11}+E_{22} )\Big ), \quad S_{11}+S_{22}= \frac{ E}{(1+\nu )(1-2\nu )}(E_{11}+E_{22}); \end{aligned}$$

    consequently,

    $$\begin{aligned} E_{11}=\frac{1+\nu }{E} S_{11}-\frac{\nu }{1-2\nu } \frac{(1+\nu )(1-2\nu )}{E}(S_{11}+S_{22})=\frac{1+\nu }{E} \big ( S_{11}-\nu (S_{11}+S_{22})\big )\,\,\mathrm etc. \end{aligned}$$

References

  1. Capriz G, Podio-Guidugli P (2004) Whence the boundary conditions in modern continuum physics? In: Capriz G, Podio-Guidugli P (eds) Atti dei Convegni Lincei N. 210. Accademia dei Lincei, Roma, pp 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carillo S, Podio-Guidugli P, Vergara Caffarelli G (2002) Second-order surface potentials in finite elasticity. In: Brocato M, Podio-Guidugli P (eds) Rational Continua. Classical and New, Springer Italia, Milano, pp 19–38

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cauchy AL (1823) Recherches sur l’équilibre et le mouvement intérieur des corps solides ou fluides, élastiques ou non élastiques. Bull Soc Philom Paris 9–13:300–304

    Google Scholar 

  4. DiCarlo A (2004) Actual surfaces versus virtual cuts. In: Capriz G, Podio-Guidugli P (eds) Atti dei Convegni Lincei N. 210. Accademia dei Lincei, Roma, pp 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gladwell GML (1980) Contact problems in the classsical theory of elasticity. Sijthoff and Noordhoff, Alphen aan den Rijn

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gurtin ME (1972) The Linear theory of elasticity. In: Flügge S (ed) Handbuch der Physik, vol. 2. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gurtin ME (1981) An introduction to continuum mechanics. Academic Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  8. Love AEH (1927) A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Malvern LE (1969) Introduction to the mechanics of a continuous medium. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  10. Meriam JL, Kraige LG (2003) Engineering mechanics, vol 1. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Podio-Guidugli P (2000) A primer in elasticity. Kluwer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  12. Podio-Guidugli P (2004) Examples of concentrated contact interactions in simple bodies. J Elasticity 75:167–186

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Podio-Guidugli P (2005) On concentrated interactions. In: Dal Maso G, De Simone A, Tomarelli F (eds) Variational Problems in Materials Science. Birkhäuser, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  14. Podio-Guidugli P, Schuricht F (2012) Concentrated actions on plane cuspidate bodies. J Elasticity 106:107–114

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Schuricht F (2007) A new mathematical foundation for contact interactions in continuum physics. Arch Rat Mech Anal 184:495–551

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Schuricht F (2007) Interactions in continuum physics. In: Silhavý M (ed) Mathematical modeling of bodies with complicated bulk and boundary behavior. Quaderni di Matematica 20:169–196

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sokolnikoff IS (1956) Mathematical theory of elasticity. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Podio-Guidugli .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Podio-Guidugli, P., Favata, A. (2014). Elements of Linear Elasticity. In: Elasticity for Geotechnicians. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 204. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01258-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01258-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01257-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01258-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics