Skip to main content

An Assessment on the Changing Role of State in Globalizing World Economy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Globalization of Financial Institutions

Abstract

This study aims at assessing the transformation undergone within the framework of globalization in terms of the tasks assumed by the state in the economy. This study, which provides a theoretical framework, discusses the roles the global economy assigns to the state and how the state changes the governing and financial tools. In this study, the transformation process concerning the role of the state in economic life is taken up as of the 1980s and the aftermath, which is named as the neoliberal globalization period. Initially, conceptual information is introduced, with the importance of the nation and welfare state put forth and the approaches recognized in literature are assessed. Then, the roles assigned to the state are explained in the transformation of the state with policies suggested for the solution of problems arising in 1970s and the problems attributed to the state caused by the failures of international entities undergone in the 2000s. Starting with the overall judgment that globalization wears the welfare and nation state out, it is possible to set forth that the state’s political, governmental and economic role and effectiveness vary at a certain level and especially the nation state is one of the most important actors of globalization and also one of the modest contributions of the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Until 1870s, in most European countries there was double metal monetary system, silver standard or banknotes unconvertible to metallic currency. Therefore most currencies were not convertible to one another and this in turn was a great obstacle for the development of foreign trade (Berend 2011: 16).

  2. 2.

    When one looks at the share of current account balance in national income as an indication of the intensity of financial flows, one sees that the globalization wave in the second half of the 20th century has yet not reached the pre-1913 level (Yeldan 2003: 436–437).

  3. 3.

    The internationalization of capital, to a large extent dependent on the internationalization of the state in order to preserve the continuing reorganization of social relations suitable for world scale capital accumulation. The state must ensure the necessary conditions and institutions for the internationalization of capital (Yeung 1998: 296).

  4. 4.

    This approach foresees taking inflation under control, decrease of budget deficits, liberalization of trade and capital movements thereby opening up the country economy to the rest of the world and the establishment of macro-economic stability by policies such as the liberalization of domestic goods and factor markets within the framework of structural accommodation policies. The policy package includes the liberalization of imports, competitive foreign currency rates, tax reforms, opening up to direct investments, deregulation, protection of intellectual property rights and the prioritization of education and healthcare expenditures (Szirmai 2005: 538).

  5. 5.

    http://www.econturk.org/dtp12.htm

  6. 6.

    States will continue their relations with the market as apolitisized institutions. Since the rulers of these apparently depolitisized institutions are appointed by politicians, this situation is debatable. (Eğilmez 2009: 40).

References

  • Berend, I. T. (2011). 20. Yüzyıl Avrupa İktisat Tarihi. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, D., Seeleib-Kaiser, M., & Beckfield, J. (2005). Economic globalization and the welfare state in affluent democracies, 1975–2001. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 921–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çağla, C. (2010). Yeni Başlayanlar İçin Siyaset Bilimi. İstanbul: Omnia Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çaklı, S. (2008). Devlet Harcamaları: Birikim ve Meşrulaştırma. Ekonomik Yaklaşım, Özel sayı, 19, 85–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eğilmez, M. (2009). Küresel Finans Krizi: Piyasa Sisteminin Eleştirisi. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ener, M., & Demircan, E. (2008). Küreselleşme Sürecinde Değişen Devlet Anlayışından Kamu Hizmetlerinin Dönüşümüne: Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Piyasa Mekanizmaları. SDÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, D. (2002). The role of the state and international organizations in reconciling sustainable development and globalization. International Environmental Aggrements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2(2), 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, G., & Mitchell, D. (2001). Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research, 39, 145–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelleny, R. D., & Mccoy, M. (2001). Globalization and government policy independence: The issue of taxation. Political Research Quarterly, 54(3), 509–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, F. (2000). Does globalization restrict budgetary autonomy?. Mannheim: Intereconomics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm, E. (2008). Sanayi ve İmparatorluk. Ankara: Dost Kitapevi Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazgan, G. (2002). Küreselleşme ve Ulus-Devlet Yeni Ekonomik Düzen. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konukman, A., Ekmen, S., Başaran, A., & Özok, E. T. (2005). Uluslararası Kuruluşların Kalkınma İdeolojisi: Kalkınmayı Yeniden Düşünmek. Ekonomik Yaklaşım Bildiriler Kitabı, (105–120). Ankara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koray, M. (2005). Reel Küreselleşme veya Küreselleşmenin Realitesi. Çalışma ve Toplum, 11–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moene, K. O., & Wallerstein, M. (2003). Earnings inequality and welfare spending: A disaggregated analysis. World Politics, 55(4), 485–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (June 2007). The social expenditure database: An interpretive guide SOCX 1980–2003. OECD: 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ongun, T. M. (2009). Sanayileşme ve Uluslararası Ekonomik İlişkiler. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Öztürk, N. (2002). Bürokratik Devletten Etkin Yönetime Geçiş: İyi Yönetişim. Türk İdare Dergisi, 437, 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (1996). The new politics of welfare state. World Politics, 48(2), 143–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (2010). Avrupa Rüyası. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudra, N. (2002). Globalization and the decline of the welfare state in less-developed countries. International Organization, 56(2), 411–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. A. (1997). Global capitalism and the state. International Affairs, 73(3), 427–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şenses, F. (2004). Neoliberal Küreselleşme Kalkınma İçin Bir Fırsat mı, Engel mi? Economic Research Center Working Paper, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soyer, A. (2003). 1980’den Günümüze Sağlık Politikaları. Praksis, 9, 301–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (2006). Making globalization work. New York: W. W. Norton & Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank, D., & Steinmo, S. (2002). The new political economy of taxation in advanced capitalist democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 642–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szirmai, A. (2005). The dynamics of socio-economic development an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. M. (2008). Kapitalizm Demokrasiye Karşı Tarihsel Maddeciliğin Yeniden Yorumlanması. İstanbul: Yordam Kitap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeldan, E. (2002). Neoliberal Küreselleşme İdeolojisinin Kalkınma Söylemi Üzerine Değerlendirmeler. Praksis, 7, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeldan, E. (2003). Neoliberalizmin İdeolojik Bir Söylemi Olarak Küreselleşme. İktisat Üzerine Yazılar I Küresel Düzen: Birikim, Devlet ve Sınıflar (427–452). içinde İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W.-C. (1998). Capital, state and space: Contesting the borderless world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 23(3), 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorlu, K. (2010). Global Krize Karşı İnsan Odaklı Bir Yönetim Modeli. Kırgızistan: Uluslararası Global Mali Kriz Konferansı.

    Google Scholar 

  • http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=REV. Accessed: 20.05.2012

  • http://www.tcmb.gov.tr/yeni/evds/yayin/kitaplar/kuresel.pdf. Accessed: 12.04.2012

  • http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database. Accessed: 20.05.2012

  • http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SOCX_AGG. Accessed: 20.05.2012

  • http://www.cesifo-group.de/portal/page/portal/ifoHome. Accessed: 20.05.2012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hale Kırmızıoğlu .

Editor information

Hasan Dincer Ümit Hacioglu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kırmızıoğlu, H., Zorlu, K. (2014). An Assessment on the Changing Role of State in Globalizing World Economy. In: Dincer, H., Hacioglu, Ü. (eds) Globalization of Financial Institutions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01125-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics