Skip to main content

Applying Cross-Industry Networks in the Early Innovation Phase

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation

Abstract

Recognizing the pervasiveness of convergence and introducing new ways of solving problems requires multiple inter-organizational relationships beyond established industry boundaries. This chapter provides essential insights into the process steps necessary for successfully preparing for distant collaboration in cross-industry networks as well as for creating multilateral cross-industry networks. Cross-industry networks comprise an intensive exchange and development of knowledge in a process of mutual learning and adaptation through collaborative arrangements with specific innovation partners. The role of the technology managers, who identify synergic effects across the process stage of identifying potential absorptive capacity, and the function of the network managers, who act as interface between the firm and its external partners, are key for the exchange of ideas and for building expertise for the early innovation phase. Also cultural issues must be considered when implementing multilateral cross-industry networks, as processes of knowledge work beyond organizational boundaries entail organizational cognitive distance. An established network culture based on common values like trust and openness as well as shared norms, objectives and interests facilitates the sharing and transfer of knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Back A, von Krogh G, Seufert A, Enkel E (2005) Putting knowledge networks into action. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bartol KM, Srivastava A (2002) Encouraging knowledge sharing: the role of organizational reward systems. J Leadersh Organ Stud 91(1):64–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt RS (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1):128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels E (2008) Organizational antecedents of second-order competences. Strateg Manage J 29(5):519–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Brentani U, Reid SE (2012) The fuzzy front-end of discontinuous innovation: insights for research and management. J Prod Innov Manage 29(1):70–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkel E (2010) Attributes required for profiting from open innovation in networks. Int J Technol Manage 52(3/4):344–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkel E, Gassmann O (2010) Creative imitation: exploring the case of cross-industry innovation. R&D Manage 40(3):256–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkel E, Heil S (2012) Assessing and managing cognitive distance in cross-industry innovation. In: Paper presented at the R&D management conference (RADMA), Grenoble

    Google Scholar 

  • Enkel E, Mezger F (2013) Imitation processes and their application for business model innovation: an explorative study. Int J Innov Manage 17(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Enkel E, Gassmann O, Chesbrough H (2009) Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Manage 39(4):311–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming L, Sorenson O (2001) Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data. Res Policy 30(7):1019–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann O, Zeschky M (2008) Opening up the solution space: the role of analogical thinking for breakthrough product innovation. Creativity Innov Manage 17(2):97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacklin F (2008) Management of convergence in innovation: strategies and capabilities for value creation beyond blurring industry boundaries. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel G (1991) Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strateg Manage J 12(S1):83–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Adm Sci Q 35(1):9–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell JM, Shea CM (2001) Individual differences, environmental scanning, innovation framing, and champion behavior: key predictors of project performance. J Prod Innov Manage 18(1):15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen JJP, Van Den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2005) Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter? Acad Manage J 48(6):999–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalogerakis K, Lüthje C, Herstatt C (2010) Developing innovations based on analogies: experience from design and engineering consultants. J Prod Innov Manage 27(3):418–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad Manage J 45(6):1183–1194. doi:10.2307/3069433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz R, Allen TJ (1982) Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: a look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D project groups. R&D Manage 12(1):7–20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane PJ, Lubatkin M (1998) Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strateg Manage J 19(5):461–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane PJ, Koka BR, Pathak S (2006) The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Acad Manage Rev 31(4):833–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen K, Salter A (2006) Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strateg Manage J 27(2):131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery DC (2009) Plus ca change: industrial R&D in the “third industrial revolution”. Ind Corp Change 18(1):1–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS (1996) Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strateg Manage J 17(Special Issue):77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowery DC, Oxley JE, Silverman BS (1998) Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Res Policy 27(5):507–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom B (1999) Inter-firm alliances: analysis and design. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom B (2004) Inter-firm collaboration, learning and networks: an integrated approach. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom B, Van Haverbeke W, Duysters G, Gilsing V, Van Den Oord A (2007) Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Res Policy 36(7):1016–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid SE, De Brentani U (2004) The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: a theoretical model. J Prod Innov Manage 21(3):170–184. doi:10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00068.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter T, Gemünden HG (2003) Network competence: its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. J Bus Res 56(9):745–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley T, Behrens D, Krackhardt D (2000) Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strateg Manage J 21(3):369–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart TE (1998) Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Adm Sci Q 43(3):668–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strateg Manage J 28(13):1319–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Wal A, Criscuolo P, Salter A (2011) Absorptive capacity at the individual level: an ambidexterity approach to external engagement. Paper presented at the DRUID 2011, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, George G (2002) Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad Manage Rev 27(2):185–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann O, Zeschky M, Wolff T, Stahl M (2010b) Crossing the industry-line: breakthrough innovation through cross-industry alliances with ‘non-suppliers’. Long Range Plann 43(5–6):639–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschatzky K (2001) Networks in innovation research and innovation policy – an introduction. In: Koschatzky K, Kulicke M, Zenker A (eds) Innovation networks: concepts and challenges in the European perspective. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen Enkel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Enkel, E., Heil, S. (2014). Applying Cross-Industry Networks in the Early Innovation Phase. In: Gassmann, O., Schweitzer, F. (eds) Management of the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01056-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics