Skip to main content

Integrating Customers at the Front End of Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation

Abstract

The trend towards open innovation and crowdsourcing inspires new ways of thinking about customers’ involvement in the innovation process, which encourages companies to open up their innovation processes and gain customer insights from people and institutions outside the firm. In order to drive a product successfully from the front end to the next innovation stage, managers need information, which can be either solution information or needs information, that helps them reduce technical and market uncertainties. The customer’s role in the process of gathering information differs according to whether the indirect, and more traditional, approach of integrating the customer (manufacturer active paradigm) or the approach of direct customer integration is chosen, where the creative potential and the tacit knowledge of the user are directly used as innovation input (customer active paradigm). The targets for customer integration have to be set accordingly, and the most suitable market research tool has to be selected, which either can belong to the group of needs-focused research methods or of solution-focused research techniques. This chapter also discusses the issue of how to find the appropriate participants and to encourage them to get involved in the process and how the findings can best be implemented in the company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achtenhagen L, MĂĽller-Lietzkow J, zu Knyphausen-AufseĂź D (2003) Das open source-Dilemma: open source-software zwischen freier VerfĂĽgbarkeit und Kommerzialisierung. Schmalenbachs Zeitung fĂĽr betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 55:455–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagan J, Vogel CM (2002) Creating breakthrough products: innovation from product planning to program approval. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen CM (2000) The innovator’s Dilemma. Harper Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35(1):128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahan E, Kim AJ, Lo AW, Poggio T, Chan N (2011) Securities trading of concepts (STOC). J Market Res 48(3):497–517. doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.3.497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Luca LM, Atuahene-Gima K (2007) Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: examining the different routes to product innovation performance. J Market 71:95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs C, Schreier M (2011) Customer empowerment in new product development. J Prod Innov Manage 28(1):17–32. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00778.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FĂĽller J (2010) Refining virtual co-creation from a consumer perspective. Calif Manage Rev 52(2):98–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann O (2001) Multicultural teams: increasing creativity and innovation by diversity. Creativity Innov Manage 10(2):88–95. doi:10.1111/1467-8691.00206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruner KE, Homburg C (2000) Does customer interaction enhance new product success? J Bus Res 49(1):1–14. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00013-2, 10.1016/S0148-2963%2899%2900013-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harison E, Koski H (2010) Applying open innovation in business strategies: evidence from Finnish software firms. Res Policy 39(3):351–359. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MD (1996) The evolution of communication. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman DL, Kopalle PK, Novak TP (2010) The “right” consumers for better concepts: identifying consumers high in emergent nature to develop new product concepts. J Market Res 47(5):854–865. doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.5.854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungk R, MĂĽllert N (1987) Future workshops: how to create desirable futures. Institute for Social Inventions, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad Manage J 45(6):1183–1194. doi:10.2307/3069433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz R, Allen TJ (1982) Investigating the not invented here (NIH) syndrome: a look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D project groups. R&D Manage 12(1):7–20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler T, FĂĽller J, Matzler K, Stieger D (2011) Co-creation in virtual worlds: the design of the user experience. MIS Quart 35(3):773–788

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P, Keller KL (2006) Marketing management. Pearson Education, Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets RV (1998) On netnography: initial reflections on consumer research investigations of cyberculture. Adv Consum Res 25(1):366–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurylko DT (2005) Moonraker project seeks marketing savvy for VW. Automot News Eur 10(17):22

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard D, Rayport JF (1997) Spark innovation through emphatic design. Harv Bus Rev 75(6):102–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner J, Tirole J (2005) The scope of open source licenses. J Law Econ Organ 21(1):20–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littler D, Leverick F, Bruce M (1995) Factors affecting the process of collaborative product development: a study of UK manufacturers of information and communications technology products. J Prod Innov Manage 12(1):16–32. doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1210016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee GB (2005) Rethinking invention: cognition and the economics of technological creativity. J Econ Behav Organ 57(1):29–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra NK (2009) Basic marketing research. A decision-making approach. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr JJ, Sengupta S, Slater SF (2010) Marketing of high-technology products and innovations. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • MĂĽller-Seitz G, Reger G (2009) Is open source software living up to its promises? Insights for open innovation management from two open source software-inspired projects. R&D Manage 39(4):372–381. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00565.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers DG (2004) Exploring psychology. Worth Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa S, Piller FT (2006) Reducing the risks of new product development. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 47(Winter):65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Paustian C (2001) Better products through virtual customers. MIT Sloan Manage Rev 42(3):14–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Peruzzi M (2011) Open innovation – Kundeneinbindung im fuzzy front end der voestalpine Stahl GmbH, 8. Forum Innovation, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Piller FT, Walcher D (2006) Toolkits for idea competitions: a novel method to integrate users in new product development. R&D Manage 36(3):307–318. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00432.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poetz MK, Schreier M (2012) The value of crowdsourcing: can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? J Prod Innov Manage 29(2):245–256. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00893.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid SE, De Brentani U (2004) The fuzzy front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: a theoretical model. J Prod Innov Manage 21(3):170–184. doi:10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00068.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfleisch A, Moorman C (2001) The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: a strength-of-ties perspective. J Market 65(2):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shippey KC (2009) A short course in international intellectual property rights. World Trade Press, Novato

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2008) Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulwick AW (2005) What customers want. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel E (1986) Lead users: a source of novel product concepts. Manage Sci 32(7):791–805. doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791 DOI:10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791#_self

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel E, Franke N, PrĂĽgl RW (2009) Pyramiding: efficient search for rare subjects. Res Policy 38(9):1397–1406. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2009.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann O, Kausch C, Enkel E (2010a) Negative side effects of customer integration. Int J Technol Manage 50(1):43–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fiona Schweitzer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schweitzer, F. (2014). Integrating Customers at the Front End of Innovation. In: Gassmann, O., Schweitzer, F. (eds) Management of the Fuzzy Front End of Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01056-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics