Abstract
The ability to quantify soil water flow is a prerequisite for the accurate prediction of solute transfer within the unsaturated zone. Monitoring these fluxes is a challenge because the results are required for answering not only scientific but also practical questions regarding the protection of groundwater, the sustainable management of agricultural, forestry, mining or set aside industrial areas, the reduction of leachate loss from landfills, and for explaining the fate of environmentally harmful substances. Both direct and indirect methods exist for estimating water flux rates; these have been applied with varying success. In Europe, the use of direct lysimetry methods for measuring water and solute fluxes in soils has increased significantly in recent years. Although this technique generates reliable drainage data, it involves relatively high investment and maintenance costs. New lysimeter techniques have been developed to tackle this problem. It is now possible to collect large monolithic soil columns and to measure the soil water balance of these monoliths (surface area 0.03–2 m2 and depth to 3 m) with a high degree of precision (±20 g). Furthermore, progress in lysimetry enables us to ascertain experimentally the mass input of dew and to calculate actual evapotranspiration, precipitation and seepage rates. Weighable groundwater lysimeters have been developed in addition to gravitation lysimeters. Different lysimeter types and their usage will be presented and explained using practical examples.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aboukhaled A, Alfaro A, Smith M (1982) Lysimeters, FAO Irrigation and Drainage, Paper 39, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome Italy, p 68
Allen RG, Howell TA, Pruitt WO, Walter IA, Jensen ME (1991) Lysimeters for evapotranspiration and environmental measurements. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lysimetry, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY, pp 79–84
Bethge-Steffens D, Meissner R, Rupp H (2004) Development and practical test of a weighable groundwater lysimeter for floodplain sites. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 167(4):516–524
DIN 4049-3 (1994) Hydrologie—Teil 3: Begriffe zur quantitativen Hydrologie. DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V. (Herausgeber), Oktober 1994. Beuth Verlag GmbH, Berlin, p 80
Führ F, Hance RJ, Plimmer JR, Nelson JO (1998) Comprehensive tracer studies on the environmental behavior of pesticides: the lysimeter concept. In: Führ F, Hance RJ, Plimmer JR, Nelson JO (eds.) American Chemical Society, Washington, DC
Gee GW, Hillel D (1988) Groundwater recharge in arid regions: review and critique of estimation methods. Hydrol Process 2(3):255–266
Gee GW, Ward AL, Caldwell TG, Ritter JC (2002) A vadose zone water fluxmeter with divergence control. Water Resour Res 38(8):16-1–16-7
Gee GW, Newman BD, Green SR, Meissner R, Rupp H, Zhang ZF, Keller JM, Waugh WJ, van der Velde M, Salazar J (2009) Passive wick fluxmeters: design considerations and field applications. Water Resour Res 45:1–18
Klocke NL, Todd RW, Hergert GW, Watts DG, Parkhurst AM (1993) Design, installation, and performance of percolation lysimeters for water-quality sampling. Transact ASAE 6:429–435
Lanthaler C, Fank J (2005) Lysimeter stations and soil hydrology measuring sites in Europe: results of a 2004 survey. In: Proceedings of the 11th Lysimeter conference, Raumberg-Gumpenstein, Austria, 19–24
Meissner R, Rupp H, Schubert M (2000) Novel lysimeter techniques: a basis for the improved investigation of water, gas, and solute transport in soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163(6):603–608
Meissner R, Seeger J, Rupp H, Seyfarth M, Borg H (2007) Measurement of dew, fog, and rime with a high-precision gravitation lysimeter. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 170(3):335–344
Meissner R, Rupp H, Seyfarth M (2008) Advances in out door lysimeter techniques. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 8:217–225
Meissner R, Rupp H, Seeger J, Ollesch G, Gee GW (2010) A comparison of water flux measurements: passive wick-samplers versus drainage lysimeters. Eur J Soil Sci 61:609–621
Schlotter D, Schack-Kirchner H, Hildebrand EE, von Wilpert K (2012) Equivalence or complementarity of soil-solution extraction methods. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 175(2):236–244
Weihermueller L (2012) Saugkerze. In: DWA Merkblatt 905. Gewinnung von Bodenlösung. Beprobungssysteme und Einflussgrößen. Hennef, Deutsche Vereinigung für Wasserwirtschaft, Abwasser und Abfall e.V. -DWA-, p 36
Weihermueller L, Siemens J, Deurer M, Knoblauch S, Rupp H, Goettlein A, Puetz T (2007) In situ soil water extraction: a review. J Environ Qual 36:1735–1748
Wriedt G (2004) Modelling of nitrogen transport and turnover during soil and groundwater passage in a small lowland catchment of Northern Germany. Doctoral Thesis, Potsdam University, Germany
Xiao H, Meissner R, Seeger J, Rupp H, Borg H (2009) Testing the precision of a weighable gravitation lysimeter. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172:194–200
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meissner, R., Rupp, H., Seyfarth, M. (2014). Advanced Technologies in Lysimetry. In: Mueller, L., Saparov, A., Lischeid, G. (eds) Novel Measurement and Assessment Tools for Monitoring and Management of Land and Water Resources in Agricultural Landscapes of Central Asia. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01017-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01017-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01016-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01017-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)