Abstract
This chapter presents the general aspects of the response theory for molecular solutes in the presence of time-dependent perturbing fields: (i) the non-equilibrium solvation, (ii) the variational formulation of the time-dependent non-linear QM problem, and (iii) the connection of the molecular response functions with their macroscopic counterparts. The linear and quadratic molecular response functions are described at the coupled-cluster level.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The concept of non-equilibrium solvation has been introduced to describe the solvent polarization in processes involving dynamic, or sudden, variations of solute charge distribution of the solute, and it takes into account that during the time-scale of a fast event not all the degrees of freedoms of the solvent molecules (nuclear, translational, rotational,vibrational; electronic) are able to respond to the variations of the charge distribution of the solute (see Appendix).
- 2.
We assume that \(V^{\prime }(t)\) is applied adiabatically so that it vanishes at \(t=-\infty .\)
- 3.
- 4.
The time-average over a period T for a general time-dependent function \(g(t)\) is defined as
$$\begin{aligned} \{g(t)\}_T=\frac{1}{T}\int ^{T/2}_{-T/2}g(t)dt \nonumber \end{aligned}$$ - 5.
Being the perturbing operator \(V(t)\) Hermitian, we have that: \(X^\dag =X\), \(\omega _{-j}=-\omega _j\), \(\varepsilon (\omega _j)^*=\varepsilon (\omega _{-j}). \)
- 6.
We here consider the Molecular Orbital (MO) “unrelaxed” approach in which the reference state does not depend on the perturbation \(V(t).\)
- 7.
The expansions (3.18a and 3.18b) imply an expansion in time-dependent polarization charges of (3.15):
$$\begin{aligned} {\bar{ \mathbf Q}}_N(t)={\bar{ \mathbf Q}}_N(t)^{(0)}+{\bar{ \mathbf Q}}_N(t)^{(1)}+\cdots \nonumber \end{aligned}$$where \({\bar{ \mathbf Q}}_N(t)^{(n)}\) are terms of n-th order in the perturbation.
- 8.
- 9.
Third- and second-order derivatives of the \(T,\varLambda \) amplitudes are eliminated, respectively, by the zero- and first order stationarity of the quasi-free-energy functional \(\varDelta G_{CC}.\)
- 10.
The polarization charges operator \({\mathbf Q}_N^{|\omega _X\,+\,\omega _Y|}\) is evaluated from Eq. (3.27) using the dielectric permittivity \(\varepsilon (|\omega _X+\omega _Y|)\) of the solvent at the frequency \(|\omega _X+\omega _Y|\). Therefore, Eq. (3.34a) is able to describe the non-equilibrium solvation effects in the quadratic response function describing general second-order molecular processes [4] (see Appendix B in Ref. [19]).
- 11.
The contribution is due to the effect of the boundary condition of the cavity on the Maxwell field.
- 12.
The charges \(\tilde{\mathbf{Q}}^{\mathbf{E}}_i\) are obtained as solution of the electrostatic problem (i.e. the Laplace problem) describing the Maxwell field \({\mathbf{E}}\) in the presence of the void cavity. The corresponding integral equation with domain on the PCM cavity boundary \(\Gamma \) is:
$$\begin{aligned} \left( 2\pi \frac{\epsilon +1}{\epsilon -1} +D^*\right) \sigma _i^E(\mathbf{s})=-E_in_i(\mathbf{s})\ \mathbf{s}\subset \Gamma \end{aligned}$$where \(E_i\) and \(n_i\) are, respectively the i-th Cartesian component of the Maxwell field \(\mathbf{E}\) and of a unit vector \(\mathbf{n}(r)\) normal to the cavity surface at the point \(\mathbf{s}\), and \(\sigma _i^E(\mathbf{s})\) is the apparent surface charge density determined by the Maxwell field.
The discretization of the the apparent surface charge density \(\sigma _i^E(\mathbf{s})\) leads then to the discrete set of charges \(\tilde{\mathbf{Q}}^{\mathbf{E}}_i\).
References
J. Tomasi, B. Mennucci, R. Cammi, Chem. Rev. 105, 2999 (2005)
J. Olsen, P. Jørgensen, in Modern electronic structure theory, vol. 2, ed. by D. Yarkony (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), p. 857
T. Helgaker, S. Coriani, P. JørgensenK, J. Olsen Kristensen, K. Ruud, Chem. Rev. 112, 543 (2012)
R. Cammi, M. Cossi, B. Mennucci, J. Tomasi, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 10556 (1996)
R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 9877 (1999)
J. Tomasi, R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 75, 783 (1999)
B. Mennucci, J. Tomasi, R. Cammi, J.R. Cheesman, M.J. Frisch, F.S. Devlin, S. Gabriel, P.J. Stephens, J. Chem. Phys. A 106, 6102 (2002)
R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, J. Tomasi, J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 5631 (2000)
M. Cossi, V. Barone, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 4701 (2001)
R. Cammi, L. Frediani, B. Mennucci, K., Rudd. J. Chem. Phys. 119, 5818 (2003)
C. Cappelli, B. Mennucci, J. Tomasi, R. Cammi, A. Rizzo, G.L.J.A., Rikken, R. Mathevet, C. Rizzo. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 10712 (2003)
C. Cappelli, B. Mennucci, R. Cammi, A. Rizzo, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 18706 (2005)
L. Frediani, Z. Rinkevicius, H. Ågren. J. Chem. Phys. 122, 244104 (2005)
B. Jansík, A. Rizzo, L. Frediani, K. Ruud, S. Coriani, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 234105 (2006)
A. Rizzo, L. Frediani, K. Ruud, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 164321 (2007)
K. Zhao, L. Ferrighi, L. Frediani, C.-K. Wang, Y. Luo, J. Chem. Phys. 126, 204509 (2007)
L. Ferrighi, L. Frediani, E. Fossgaard, K. Ruud, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 244103 (2007)
N. Lin, L. Ferrighi, X. Zhao, K. Ruud, A. Rizzo, Y. Luo, J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 4703 (2008)
R. Cammi, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 112, 2547 (2012)
R. Cammi, Adv. Quantum Chem. 64, 1 (2012)
R.A. Marcus, J. Phys. Chem. 24, 966 (1956); (b) M.D. Newton, H.L. Friedman, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 4460(1988); (c) H.J. Kim, J.T. Hynes, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 5194(1990); (d) M.V. Basilevsky, G.E. Chudinov, Chem. Phys. 144, 155 (1990); (e) M.A. Aguilar, F.J. Olivares del Valle, J. Tomasi, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 7375(1993); (f) D.G. Truhlar, G.K. Schenter, B.C. Garrett, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5756(1993); (g) R. Cammi, J. Tomasi, Int. J. Quantum Chem. (Symposium) 29, 465(1995); (h) C.P. Hsu, X. Song, R.A. Marcus, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 2546 (1997); (i) M. Caricato, B. Mennucci, J. Tomasi, F. Ingrosso, R. Cammi, S. Corni, G. Scalmani. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 124520 (2006)
R. Cammi, J. Tomasi, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 60, 297 (1996)
J. Frenkel, Wave Mechanics: Advanced General Theory (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1934)
H. Sambe, Phys. Rev. A 7, 2203 (1973)
P.W. Langhoff, S.T. Epstein, M. Karplus, Rev. Mod. Phys. 105, 602 (1972)
F. Aiga, K. Sasagane, R. Itoh, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 3779 (1993)
K. Sasagane, F. Aiga, R. Itoh, J. Chem. Phys. 99, 3738 (1993)
F. Aiga, T. Tada, R. Yoshimura, J. Chem. Phys. 111, 2878 (1999)
O. Christiansen, P. Jørgensen, C. Hättig, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 68, 1 (1998)
R. Wortmann, K. Elich, S. Lebus, W. Liptay, P. Borowicz, A. Grabowska, J. Phys. Chem. 92, 9724 (1992)
R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, J. Tomasi, J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 870 (1998)
R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, J. Tomasi, J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 4690 (1998)
R. Cammi, B. Mennucci, in Continuum Solvation Models in Chemical Physics, ed. by B. Mennucci, R. Cammi (Wiley, Chichester, 2007), p. 238
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cammi, R. (2013). General Response Theory for the Polarizable Continuum Model. In: Molecular Response Functions for the Polarizable Continuum Model. SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00987-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00987-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00986-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00987-2
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)