Skip to main content

Field Measurements to Investigate Submerged Slope Failures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences

Abstract

Many flood defences in The Netherlands have been disapproved for flow slides of the Holocene subsoil. Traditionally these flow slides are assumed to be induced by static liquefaction. Only in recent times it has been recognized that flow slides may also concern breach flows, which do not necessarily require loosely packed sand. For both static liquefaction and breach flow the inaccuracy of the currently applied methods to determine in situ density lead to high computed probabilities of failure, which is one of the main problems in the safety assessment of flow slides. In order to reduce this uncertainty, based on a literature study a number of methods were selected and applied on four test locations: two sites where flow slides occurred and two sites where no flow slides occurred, but for which high probabilities on flow slides were calculated based on current Dutch assessment rules for liquefaction and breach flow. For these sites CPT’s and electrical resistivity cone tests available from earlier investigations, were extended with seismic CPT’s and interpreted for relative density and state parameter. The results of this study lead to the conclusion that some of the historical flow slides in The Netherlands may have been the result of static liquefaction in loosely packed sand. For many other slopes, however, it is more reasonable to assume that the failures must have been breach flows in medium or densely packed layers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baldi G, Bellotti R, Ghionna V, Jamiolkowski M, Pasqualini E (1982) Design parameters for sands from CPT. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European symposium on penetration testing, Amsterdam, pp 425–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Been K, Jefferies MG (1985) A state parameter for sands. Géotechnique 35(2):99–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Been K, Jefferies MG (1992) Towards systematic CPT interpretation. In: Proceedings of the wroth symposium, Oxford, pp 44–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Been K, Jefferies MG, Crooks JHA, Rothenburg L (1987) The cone penetration test in sands: part II, general inference of state. Géotechnique 37(3):285–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf HC, Zuidberg HM (1985) Field investigations. In: de Leeuw EH (ed) The Netherlands commemorative volume XI, ICSMFE, The Hague, pp 29–52

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot MB, Mastbergen DR (2006) Scour hole slope instability in sandy soils. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference scour and erosion, CURNET, Gouda, The Netherlands, pp126–127

    Google Scholar 

  • DeJong JT, Jaeger RA, Boulanger RW, Randolph MF, Wahl DAJ (2012) Variable penetration rate cone testing for characterization of intermediate soils. In: Coutinho RQ, Mayne PW (eds) Geotechnical and geophysical site characterization 4. Taylor & Francis Group, London. ISBN 978-0-415-62136-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghafghazi M (2011) Towards comprehensive interpretation of the state parameter from cone penetration testing in cohesionless soils. Ph.D. thesis. The University of British Columbia. April 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamiolkowski M, Lo Presti DCF, Manassero M (2001) Evaluation of relative density and shear strength of sands from cone penetration test and flat dilatometer test. In: Soil behavior and soft ground construction, vol 119, GSP. ASCE, Reston, pp 201–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies M, Shuttle D (2011) Understanding liquefaction trough applied mechanics. In: 5th international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Santiago, Chile, January 2011, pp 10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhawy FH, Mayne PH (1990) Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design. Electric Power Research Institute, EPRI, Palo Alto, Augustus 1990

    Google Scholar 

  • Lade PV, Yamamuro JA, Liggio CD (2009) Effects of fines content on void ratio, compressibility, and static liquefaction of silty sand. Geomech Eng 1(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBlanc C, Randolph MF (2008) Interpretation of Piezocones in silt, using cavity expansion and critical state methods. In: The 12th international conference of International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG), Goa, India, 1–6 October 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Plewes HD, Davies MP, Jefferies MG (1992) CPT based screening procedure for evaluating liquefaction susceptibility. In: Proceedings of the 45th Canadian geotechnical conference, Toronto, pp 4:1–4:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijkswaterstaat (2007) Voorschrift Toetsen op Veiligheid Primaire Waterkeringen. Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Delft, September 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK (2010) Estimating in-situ state parameter and friction angle in sandy soils from CPT. In: 2nd international symposium on cone penetration testing. Huntington Beach

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaid F (2009) In situ testing in geomechanics – the main tests. Taylor & Francis, London/New York, 327 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaid F, Yu HS (2007) Interpretation of the seismic cone test in granular soils. Géotechnique 57(3):265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuttle DA, Cunning J (2007) Liquefaction potential of silts from CPTu. Can Geotech J 44:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuttle DA, Jefferies MG (1998) Dimensionless and unbiased CPT interpretation in sand. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 22:351–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoutjesdijk TP, de Groot MB (1994) Verificatie SLIQ2D aan de Zeeuwse praktijk. Rapport Grondmechanica, Delft CO-341940/21, April 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabak F (2011) Analysis of breach flow slides with HMBreach. Deltares, Delft, 1204202.019

    Google Scholar 

  • TAW (2001). Technisch Rapport Waterkerende Grondconstructies – Geotechnische aspecten van dijken, dammen en boezemkaden. Technische Adviescommisie voor de Waterkering. Delft, Juni 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Ham GA, de Groot MB, Mastbergen DR (2013) A semi-empirical method to assess flow slide probability. Submarine mass wasting and their consequences. In: 6th international symposium on submarine mass movements and their consequences, Kiel, Germany, 23–25 September 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Wride CE, Robertson PK, Biggar KW, Campanella RG, Hofmann BA, Hughes JMO, Küpper A, Woeller DJ (2000) Interpretation of in situ test results from the CANLEX sites. Can Geotech J 37:505–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Dr. A. Kort and prof. P.K. Robertson are very much appreciated for reviewing this paper. Rijkswaterstaat, who commissioned this study as a part of the research programme `Sterkte en Belastingen Waterkeringen´ (SBW) is also appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander van Duinen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Duinen, A., Bezuijen, A., van den Ham, G., Hopman, V. (2014). Field Measurements to Investigate Submerged Slope Failures. In: Krastel, S., et al. Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences. Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research, vol 37. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00972-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics