Abstract
Mainstreaming of adaptation to climate change is recommended by many international agencies and authors of climate change literature in order to guarantee more efficient use of financial and human resources than occurs when adaptation is designed, implemented, and managed as a series of stand-alone activities. Nevertheless, there is ongoing debate over how to proceed in order to achieve effective mainstreaming, at what level to act, on what topics to concentrate, and what type of initiative should be prioritized. The article offers information and arguments that may help the administrations of Sub-Saharan cities implement the options that are most appropriate for their specific conditions. The first section situates the mainstreaming of adaptation to climate change within the more general and consolidated strategy of the Environment Integration Policy, and outlines the current process of conceptualizing the question. The mainstreaming approach is compared to the action-specific approach in order to better highlight its strengths and weaknesses, while the risks of ineffective mainstreaming are explored with particular reference to the case of Tanzania. A more detailed examination follows of possible topics and the approaches used for mainstreaming in sectoral policies related to urban development and environmental management. Lastly, the specificity of Sub-Saharan cities is addressed, which raises both concerns and hopes for the current advantages of pursuing adaptation through mainstreaming at the local level.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Consider as an example the definition of mainstreaming used in EuropeAid documents: “the process of systematically integrating a selected value/idea/theme into all domains of the EC development co-operation to promote specific (transposing ideas, influencing policies) as well as general development outcomes” (iQSG 2004 quoted in EC 2011: 16).
- 2.
An example of this is the UNDP-UNEP framework for mainstreaming climate change adaptation, which defines three levels of intervention: (i) strengthening the base for adaptation, by consciously aiming development efforts at reducing vulnerability; (ii) promoting mainstreaming adaptation measures, thus ensuring that climate change is considered in the decision-making of relevant government agencies; and (iii) promoting specific adaptation measures that target issues the first two levels have not yet tackled (De Coninck 2011). Though the mainstreaming approach is given higher priority, this framework does not exclude the possibility of recourse to special actions when satisfying results are not achieved through mainstreaming intervention modalities.
- 3.
Death (2013) cites two cases in support of his thesis: the Kilimo Kwanza agricultural development policy and the National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty MKUKUTA I and II (URT 2005 and 2010). Regarding the latter in particular, he states that “the repeated stress on the very existence of quantitative and measurable targets and indicators—rather than success or failure in meeting them – is evidence of this focus [on statist control over land and territory]” (ibid.: 22).
- 4.
It should be noticed that, to date, major development agencies have not make a clear choice between the two approaches. The already mentioned UNDP-UNEP framework (De Coninck 2011), for instance, while paying particular attention to addressing the adaptation deficit and increasing the overall resilience of the country and population, does not exclude the need for climate-proofing policies.
References
Adger WN, Vincent K (2005) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. CR Geosci 337:399–410
Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty RS, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints, and capacity. In: IPCC, climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 717–743
Agrawala S (ed) (2005) Bridge over troubled waters: linking climate change and development. OECD Publishing, Paris, p 154
Agrawala S, van Aalst M (2005) Bridging the gap between climate change and development. In: Agrawala S (ed) Bridge over troubled waters: linking climate change and development. OECD Publishing, Paris, pp 133–146
Brouwer S, Rayner T, Huitema D (2013) Mainstreaming climate policy: the case of climate adaptation and the implementation of EU water policy. Environ Plann C 31(1):134–153
Cardona OD, van Aalst MK, Birkmann J, Fordham M, McGregor G, Perez R, Pulwarty RS, Schipper ELF and Sinh BT (2012) Determinants of risk: exposure and vulnerability. In: IPCC (2012) op. cit., p 65–108
Cohen S, Demeritt D, Robinson J, Rothman D (1998) Climate change and sustainable development: towards dialogue. Glob Environ Change 8(4):341–371
Cutter S, Osman-Elasha B, Campbell J, Cheong S-M, McCormick S, Pulwarty R, Supratid S, Ziervogel G (2012) Managing the risks from climate extremes at the local level. In: IPCC (2012) op. cit., p 291–338
Davoudi S, Porter L (2012) Interface: applying the resilience perspective to planning: critical thoughts from theory and practice. Plann Theor Pract 13(2):299–333
De Coninck S (2009) Mainstreaming poverty-environment linkages into development planning: a handbook for practitioners. UNDP-UNEP, Nairobi, p 120
De Coninck S (2011) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change into development planning: a guide for practitioners. UNDP-UNEP, Nairobi, p 86
Death C (2013) Environmental mainstreaming and post-sovereign governance in Tanzania. J East Afr Stud 7(1):1–20
EC (2011) Guidelines on the integration of environment and climate change in development cooperation. Tools and methods series 4:18. http://capacity4dev.ec.europa.eu. Accessed 28 July 2013
Friedmann J (2005) Globalization and the emerging culture of planning. Prog Plann 64(3):183–234
Gupta J, van de Grijp N (eds) (2010) Mainstreaming climate change in development cooperation: theory, practice and implications for the European union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Huq S, Rahman A, Konate M, Sokona Y, Reid H (2003) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in least developed countries (LDCs). IIED, London, p 40
IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) Contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York
IPCC (2012) Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. In: Field CB, V Barros, TF Stocker, D Qin, DJ Dokken, KL Ebi, MD Mastrandrea, KJ Mach, G-K Plattner, SK Allen, M Tignor and PM Midgley (eds) A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York
Khailania DK, Pererai R (2013) Mainstreaming disaster resilience attributes in local development plans for the adaptation to climate change induced flooding: A study based on the local plan of Shah Alam city Malaysia. Land Use Policy 30(1):615–627
Klein RJT (2002) Climate change, adaptive capacity and sustainable development. Paper presented at the expert meeting on adaptation to climate change and sustainable development, OECD, Paris, 13–14 March 2002
Klein RJT, Schipper EL, Dessai S (2005) Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions. Environ Sci Policy 8:579–588
Klein RTJ, Eriksen SHE, Naess LO, Hammill A, Tanner TM, Robledo C, O’Brien KL (2007) Portfolio screening to support the mainstreaming of adaptation to climate change into development assistance. Clim Change 84:23–44
Lal PN, Mitchell T, Aldunce P, Auld H, Mechler R, Miyan A, Romano LE and Zakaria S (2012) National systems for managing the risks from climate extremes and disasters. In: IPCC (2012) op. cit., p 339–392
Lasco RD, Pulhin FB, Jaranilla-Sanchez PA, Delfino RJP, Gerpacio R, Garcia K (2009) Mainstreaming adaptation in developing countries: the case of the Philippines. Clim Dev 1(2):130–146
Lerise F (2000) Urban governance and urban planning in Tanzania. In: Ngware S, Kironde JML (eds) Urbanising Tanzania: issues, initiatives, and priorities. University of Dar es Salaam Press, Dar es Salaam, p 88–116
Lim B, Spanger-Siegfried E (eds) (2004) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: developing strategies, policies and measures. UNDP, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Longwe SH (1997) The evaporation of gender policies in the patriarchal cooking pot. Dev Pract 7(2):148–156
Michaelowa A, Michaelowa K (2007) Climate or development: is ODA diverted from its original purpose? Clim Change 84(1):5–21
Nilsson M, Persson A (2003) Framework for analysing environmental policy integration. J Environ Plann Policy Manage 5(4):333–359
O’Brien K, Pelling M, Patwardhan A, Hallegatte S, Maskrey A, Oki T, Oswald-Spring U, Wilbanks T, Yanda PZ (2012) Toward a sustainable and resilient future. In: IPCC (2012) op. cit., p 437–486
O’Brien K, Eriksen SHE, Schjolden A, Nygaard LP (2007) Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Clim Policy 7:73–88
OECD (2009) Policy guidance on integrating climate change adaptation into development co-operation. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264054950-en
Pelling M (2003) The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience. Earthscan, London
Persson Å (2007) Different perspectives on EPI. In: Nilsson M, Eckerberg K (eds) Environmental policy integration in practice: shaping institutions for learning. Earthscan, London, pp 25–48
Persson Å, Klein RJT (2008) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change into official development assistance: integration of long-term climate concerns and short-term development needs. In: Proceedings of the Berlin conference on the human dimensions of global environmental change, Berlin, 22–23 Feb 2008
Ricci L (2011) Reinterpreting Sub-Saharan cities through the concept of “adaptive capacity”. An analysis of “autonomous” adaptation practices to environmental changes in peri-urban areas. PhD in Urban Planning. Sapienza University, Rome. Italian version. http://padis.uniroma1.it/handle/10805/1375. Accessed 28 July 2013
Simon D (2010) The challenges of global environmental change for urban Africa. Urban Forum 21(3):235–248
Uittenbroek CJ, Janssen-Jansen LB, Runhaar HAC (2012) Mainstreaming climate adaptation into urban planning: overcoming barriers, seizing opportunities and evaluating the results in two Dutch case studies. Reg Environ Change 13(2):399–411
UNCED Secretariat (1992) Agenda 21. United Nations, Geneva
URT (2005) National strategy for growth and reduction of poverty (MKUKUTA). Prime Minister’s Office, Dodoma
URT (2007) National Framework for urban development and environmental management (UDEM) in Tanzania. Volume II: UDEM final framework design report. Prime Minister’s Office—Regional Administration and Local Government, Dodoma
URT (2010) National strategy for growth and reduction of poverty II (MKUKUTA II). Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs, Dar es Salaam
Yamin F (2005) The European union and future climate policy: is main-streaming adaptation a distraction or part of the solution? Clim Policy 5(3):349–361
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Macchi, S., Ricci, L. (2014). Mainstreaming Adaptation into Urban Development and Environmental Management Planning: A Literature Review and Lessons from Tanzania. In: Macchi, S., Tiepolo, M. (eds) Climate Change Vulnerability in Southern African Cities. Springer Climate. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00672-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00672-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00671-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00672-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)