Skip to main content

Mainstreaming Adaptation into Urban Development and Environmental Management Planning: A Literature Review and Lessons from Tanzania

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change Vulnerability in Southern African Cities

Part of the book series: Springer Climate ((SPCL))

  • 954 Accesses

Abstract

Mainstreaming of adaptation to climate change is recommended by many international agencies and authors of climate change literature in order to guarantee more efficient use of financial and human resources than occurs when adaptation is designed, implemented, and managed as a series of stand-alone activities. Nevertheless, there is ongoing debate over how to proceed in order to achieve effective mainstreaming, at what level to act, on what topics to concentrate, and what type of initiative should be prioritized. The article offers information and arguments that may help the administrations of Sub-Saharan cities implement the options that are most appropriate for their specific conditions. The first section situates the mainstreaming of adaptation to climate change within the more general and consolidated strategy of the Environment Integration Policy, and outlines the current process of conceptualizing the question. The mainstreaming approach is compared to the action-specific approach in order to better highlight its strengths and weaknesses, while the risks of ineffective mainstreaming are explored with particular reference to the case of Tanzania. A more detailed examination follows of possible topics and the approaches used for mainstreaming in sectoral policies related to urban development and environmental management. Lastly, the specificity of Sub-Saharan cities is addressed, which raises both concerns and hopes for the current advantages of pursuing adaptation through mainstreaming at the local level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Consider as an example the definition of mainstreaming used in EuropeAid documents: “the process of systematically integrating a selected value/idea/theme into all domains of the EC development co-operation to promote specific (transposing ideas, influencing policies) as well as general development outcomes” (iQSG 2004 quoted in EC 2011: 16).

  2. 2.

    An example of this is the UNDP-UNEP framework for mainstreaming climate change adaptation, which defines three levels of intervention: (i) strengthening the base for adaptation, by consciously aiming development efforts at reducing vulnerability; (ii) promoting mainstreaming adaptation measures, thus ensuring that climate change is considered in the decision-making of relevant government agencies; and (iii) promoting specific adaptation measures that target issues the first two levels have not yet tackled (De Coninck 2011). Though the mainstreaming approach is given higher priority, this framework does not exclude the possibility of recourse to special actions when satisfying results are not achieved through mainstreaming intervention modalities.

  3. 3.

    Death (2013) cites two cases in support of his thesis: the Kilimo Kwanza agricultural development policy and the National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty MKUKUTA I and II (URT 2005 and 2010). Regarding the latter in particular, he states that “the repeated stress on the very existence of quantitative and measurable targets and indicators—rather than success or failure in meeting them – is evidence of this focus [on statist control over land and territory]” (ibid.: 22).

  4. 4.

    It should be noticed that, to date, major development agencies have not make a clear choice between the two approaches. The already mentioned UNDP-UNEP framework (De Coninck 2011), for instance, while paying particular attention to addressing the adaptation deficit and increasing the overall resilience of the country and population, does not exclude the need for climate-proofing policies.

References

  • Adger WN, Vincent K (2005) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. CR Geosci 337:399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty RS, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints, and capacity. In: IPCC, climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 717–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawala S (ed) (2005) Bridge over troubled waters: linking climate change and development. OECD Publishing, Paris, p 154

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawala S, van Aalst M (2005) Bridging the gap between climate change and development. In: Agrawala S (ed) Bridge over troubled waters: linking climate change and development. OECD Publishing, Paris, pp 133–146

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer S, Rayner T, Huitema D (2013) Mainstreaming climate policy: the case of climate adaptation and the implementation of EU water policy. Environ Plann C 31(1):134–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardona OD, van Aalst MK, Birkmann J, Fordham M, McGregor G, Perez R, Pulwarty RS, Schipper ELF and Sinh BT (2012) Determinants of risk: exposure and vulnerability. In: IPCC (2012) op. cit., p 65–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S, Demeritt D, Robinson J, Rothman D (1998) Climate change and sustainable development: towards dialogue. Glob Environ Change 8(4):341–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter S, Osman-Elasha B, Campbell J, Cheong S-M, McCormick S, Pulwarty R, Supratid S, Ziervogel G (2012) Managing the risks from climate extremes at the local level. In: IPCC (2012) op. cit., p 291–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi S, Porter L (2012) Interface: applying the resilience perspective to planning: critical thoughts from theory and practice. Plann Theor Pract 13(2):299–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Coninck S (2009) Mainstreaming poverty-environment linkages into development planning: a handbook for practitioners. UNDP-UNEP, Nairobi, p 120

    Google Scholar 

  • De Coninck S (2011) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change into development planning: a guide for practitioners. UNDP-UNEP, Nairobi, p 86

    Google Scholar 

  • Death C (2013) Environmental mainstreaming and post-sovereign governance in Tanzania. J East Afr Stud 7(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2011) Guidelines on the integration of environment and climate change in development cooperation. Tools and methods series 4:18. http://capacity4dev.ec.europa.eu. Accessed 28 July 2013

  • Friedmann J (2005) Globalization and the emerging culture of planning. Prog Plann 64(3):183–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J, van de Grijp N (eds) (2010) Mainstreaming climate change in development cooperation: theory, practice and implications for the European union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Huq S, Rahman A, Konate M, Sokona Y, Reid H (2003) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in least developed countries (LDCs). IIED, London, p 40

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. In: McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (eds) Contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2012) Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. In: Field CB, V Barros, TF Stocker, D Qin, DJ Dokken, KL Ebi, MD Mastrandrea, KJ Mach, G-K Plattner, SK Allen, M Tignor and PM Midgley (eds) A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Khailania DK, Pererai R (2013) Mainstreaming disaster resilience attributes in local development plans for the adaptation to climate change induced flooding: A study based on the local plan of Shah Alam city Malaysia. Land Use Policy 30(1):615–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein RJT (2002) Climate change, adaptive capacity and sustainable development. Paper presented at the expert meeting on adaptation to climate change and sustainable development, OECD, Paris, 13–14 March 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein RJT, Schipper EL, Dessai S (2005) Integrating mitigation and adaptation into climate and development policy: three research questions. Environ Sci Policy 8:579–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein RTJ, Eriksen SHE, Naess LO, Hammill A, Tanner TM, Robledo C, O’Brien KL (2007) Portfolio screening to support the mainstreaming of adaptation to climate change into development assistance. Clim Change 84:23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal PN, Mitchell T, Aldunce P, Auld H, Mechler R, Miyan A, Romano LE and Zakaria S (2012) National systems for managing the risks from climate extremes and disasters. In: IPCC (2012) op. cit., p 339–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasco RD, Pulhin FB, Jaranilla-Sanchez PA, Delfino RJP, Gerpacio R, Garcia K (2009) Mainstreaming adaptation in developing countries: the case of the Philippines. Clim Dev 1(2):130–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerise F (2000) Urban governance and urban planning in Tanzania. In: Ngware S, Kironde JML (eds) Urbanising Tanzania: issues, initiatives, and priorities. University of Dar es Salaam Press, Dar es Salaam, p 88–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim B, Spanger-Siegfried E (eds) (2004) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change: developing strategies, policies and measures. UNDP, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Longwe SH (1997) The evaporation of gender policies in the patriarchal cooking pot. Dev Pract 7(2):148–156

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelowa A, Michaelowa K (2007) Climate or development: is ODA diverted from its original purpose? Clim Change 84(1):5–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson M, Persson A (2003) Framework for analysing environmental policy integration. J Environ Plann Policy Manage 5(4):333–359

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien K, Pelling M, Patwardhan A, Hallegatte S, Maskrey A, Oki T, Oswald-Spring U, Wilbanks T, Yanda PZ (2012) Toward a sustainable and resilient future. In: IPCC (2012) op. cit., p 437–486

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien K, Eriksen SHE, Schjolden A, Nygaard LP (2007) Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Clim Policy 7:73–88

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009) Policy guidance on integrating climate change adaptation into development co-operation. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264054950-en

  • Pelling M (2003) The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson Å (2007) Different perspectives on EPI. In: Nilsson M, Eckerberg K (eds) Environmental policy integration in practice: shaping institutions for learning. Earthscan, London, pp 25–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson Å, Klein RJT (2008) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change into official development assistance: integration of long-term climate concerns and short-term development needs. In: Proceedings of the Berlin conference on the human dimensions of global environmental change, Berlin, 22–23 Feb 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci L (2011) Reinterpreting Sub-Saharan cities through the concept of “adaptive capacity”. An analysis of “autonomous” adaptation practices to environmental changes in peri-urban areas. PhD in Urban Planning. Sapienza University, Rome. Italian version. http://padis.uniroma1.it/handle/10805/1375. Accessed 28 July 2013

  • Simon D (2010) The challenges of global environmental change for urban Africa. Urban Forum 21(3):235–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uittenbroek CJ, Janssen-Jansen LB, Runhaar HAC (2012) Mainstreaming climate adaptation into urban planning: overcoming barriers, seizing opportunities and evaluating the results in two Dutch case studies. Reg Environ Change 13(2):399–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCED Secretariat (1992) Agenda 21. United Nations, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • URT (2005) National strategy for growth and reduction of poverty (MKUKUTA). Prime Minister’s Office, Dodoma

    Google Scholar 

  • URT (2007) National Framework for urban development and environmental management (UDEM) in Tanzania. Volume II: UDEM final framework design report. Prime Minister’s Office—Regional Administration and Local Government, Dodoma

    Google Scholar 

  • URT (2010) National strategy for growth and reduction of poverty II (MKUKUTA II). Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs, Dar es Salaam

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamin F (2005) The European union and future climate policy: is main-streaming adaptation a distraction or part of the solution? Clim Policy 5(3):349–361

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Macchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Macchi, S., Ricci, L. (2014). Mainstreaming Adaptation into Urban Development and Environmental Management Planning: A Literature Review and Lessons from Tanzania. In: Macchi, S., Tiepolo, M. (eds) Climate Change Vulnerability in Southern African Cities. Springer Climate. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00672-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics