Abstract
The complex systems field provides powerful instruments and concepts for understanding evolution and developments. Public Private Service Networks (PPSN) are increasingly advocated as beneficial for the delivery of public services. Yet how these networks evolve and adopt new policies is ill-understood. In this paper the characteristics of PPSN and Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) are compared and it is suggested that PPSN can be viewed as a particular type of CAS. We argue that CAS research methods and tools and agent based simulation of PPSN can help to increase our understanding of the evolutionary nature of PPSN.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dooley K (1996) Complex adaptive systems: a nominal definition, vol 8, pp 2–3
Provan KG, Milward HB (2001) Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Adm Rev 61:414–423
Levin SA (2002) Complex adaptive system: exploring the known, the unknown and the unknowable, vol 40. AMS, Providence, pp 3–19
Holland JH (1992) Complex adaptive systems. Daedalus 121:17–30
Janssen M, Kuk G (2006) A complex adaptive system perspective of enterprise architecture in electronic government. In: Conference on a complex adaptive system perspective of enterprise architecture in electronic government, p 71
Tesfatsion L (2003) Agent-based computational economics: modeling economies as complex adaptive systems. Inf Sci 149:262–268
Shalizi CR (2006) In: Deisboeck TS, Kresh JY (eds) Methods and techniques of complex systems science: an overview complex systems science in biomedicine. Springer, New York, pp 33–114
Bonabeau E (2002) Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(3):14
Brown DG (2006) Agent-based models. In: Geist H (ed) The Earth’s changing land: an encyclopedia of land-use and land-cover change. Greenwood Publishing Group, Westport, pp 7–13
Nicholas RJ (2001) An agent-based approach for building complex software systems. Commun ACM 44:35–41
Nutt PC (2006) Comparing public and private sector decision-making practices. J Public Adm Res Theory 16:289–318
Klievink B (2011) Unravelling interdependence coordinating public-private service networks. Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, TU Delft, Delft
Walter PW (1990) Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization, vol 12. JAI Press, London, pp 295–336
Arase D (1994) Public-private sector interest coordination in Japan’s ODA. Pac Aff 67:171–199
Anderson PW (1972) More Is different, vol 177. AAAS, Washington, pp 393–396
Rounsevell MDA, Robinson DT, Murray-Rust D (2012) From actors to agents in socio-ecological systems models. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B, Biol Sci 367:259–269
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Deljoo, A., Janssen, M., Tan, YH. (2013). The Role of Complex Systems in Public-Private Service Networks. In: Gilbert, T., Kirkilionis, M., Nicolis, G. (eds) Proceedings of the European Conference on Complex Systems 2012. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00395-5_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00395-5_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00394-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00395-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)