Skip to main content

Time-to-Failure Models for Selected Failure Mechanisms in Mechanical Engineering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reliability Physics and Engineering
  • 3265 Accesses

Abstract

The mechanical properties of materials are related to the fundamental bonding strengths of the constituent atoms in the solid and any bonding defects which might form. A molecular model is presented so that primary bond formation mechanisms (ionic, covalent, and metallic) can be better understood. How these bonds form and respond to mechanical stress/loading is very important for engineering applications. A discussion of elasticity, plasticity, and bond breakage is presented. The theoretical strengths of most molecular bonds in a crystal are seldom realized because of crystalline defects limiting the ultimate strength of the materials. Important crystalline defects such as vacancies, dislocations, and grain boundaries are discussed. These crystalline defects can play critically important roles as time-to-failure models are developed for: creep, fatigue, crack propagation, thermal expansion mismatch, corrosion and stress-corrosion cracking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Classical description is—two bodies cannot occupy the same space.

  2. 2.

    In order that ionic contributions are comprehended from both near and far, the potential for anion-pair is often written as: φ(r) = −αe 2/r, where α is the Madelung constant. In cubic crystalline structures, α = 1 to 2.

  3. 3.

    The classical oscillator will oscillate until all its energy is finally dissipated. The quantum oscillator, however, will dissipate its energy in quantum amounts (n + 1/2)ħω until it finally reaches its ground state. In the ground state, the quantum oscillator will still have zero-point energy oscillation: (1/2)ħω.

  4. 4.

    The stress gradient is given by: \( \overrightarrow {\nabla } \sigma = \left[ {\hat{x}\frac{\partial }{\partial x} + \hat{y}\frac{\partial }{\partial y} + \hat{z}\frac{\partial }{\partial z}} \right]\sigma \left( {x,y,z} \right) \).

  5. 5.

    Atom movement is opposite to vacancy movement. Atoms tend to move from relative compressive regions to relative tensile regions. Such atom movement tends to reduce both the relative compressive stress and the relative tensile stress. Atom (or vacancy) movement due to stress gradients is a stress-relief mechanism.

  6. 6.

    Specific density represents the number of atoms per unit area.

  7. 7.

    Other dislocation types can exist, such as screws dislocations (not discussed here). These can also be important in the mass-flow/creep process.

  8. 8.

    The ramp-to-failure/rupture test is described in detail in Chap. 10.

  9. 9.

    The usefulness of ramp-voltage-to-breakdown test for capacitor dielectrics is highlighted in Chap. 11.

  10. 10.

    Recall from Chap. 8, one expects the relaxation-rate constant to be thermally activated: k = k0 exp [−Q/(KBT)].

  11. 11.

    The load/force is constant. The average stress is only approximately constant during testing due to some expected cross-sectional area changes.

  12. 12.

    Recall, from Chap. 11, that the stress-migration/creep bakes for aluminum were generally done at temperatures above 100 °C.

  13. 13.

    Historically, these localized stresses at crack tips have been referred to as either stress raisers or stress risers. The terms will be used interchangeably.

  14. 14.

    The elastic energy U elastic of the material reduces with crack propagation, thus we have defined ΔU released such that it is always positive, i.e., ΔUreleased = −ΔU elastic.

  15. 15.

    Note that when the crack size a goes to zero, the apparent rupture stress goes to infinity. However, in these situations, where the right-hand side of the equation becomes extremely large, the rupture stress will be limited by the normal crack-free rupture mechanisms and σ rupture will assume the crack-free rupture strength.

  16. 16.

    Recall that specific energy density is the energy per unit area.

  17. 17.

    Historically, this has been referred to as Griffith’s equation which was developed for brittle materials. More recently, Irwin is usually credited for developing the failure in terms of a strain energy release rate G [(Eq. (56)], which incorporates both elastic and plastic deformations when new surfaces or interfaces are formed.

  18. 18.

    Linear coefficients of thermal expansion are listed for several material types (in units of 10−6/°C): α polymers ≅ 50, α metals ≅ 10, α ceramics ≅ 2, α glass ≅ 0.5.

Bibliography

Materials Science

  • Ashby, M. and D. Jones: Engineering Materials, 2nd Edition, Butterworth/Heinemann Publishers, (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, M. and D. Jones: Engineering Materials 1, Elsevier Publishing, (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Askeland, D.: The Science and Engineering of Materials, 3rd Edition, PWS Publishing Company, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C., W. Nix and A. Tetelman: The Principles of Engineering Materials, Prentice Hall, (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callister, W.: Materials Science and Engineering an Introduction, John Wiley and Sons, (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jastrzebski Z.: The Nature and Properties of Engineering Materials, 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyser, C.: Materials Science in Engineering, 3rd Edition, Charles E. Merril Publishing, (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralls, K., T. Courtney, and J. Wulff: Introduction to Materials Science and Engineering, John Wiley and Sons, (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruoff, A.: Introduction to Materials Science, Prentice-Hall, (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, K., J. Mayer, and L. Feldman: Electronic Thin Film Science For Electrical Engineers and Materials Science, Macmillan Publishing Company, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Mechanics of Materials

  • Bedford, A. and K. Liechti: Mechanics of Materials, Prentice Hall, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, M.: Introduction to the Mechanics of Solids, Addison-Wesley Publishing, (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gere, J.: Mechanics of Materials, 5th Edition, Brooks/Cole Publishing, (2001).

    Google Scholar 

Fracture Mechanics

  • Anderson, T.: Fracture Mechanics, 2nd Edition, CRC Press, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, C. and J. McPherson: Temperature Cycling Acceleration Factors for Aluminum Metallization Failure in VLSI Applications, IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, 252 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, A.: The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids, Philosophical Transactions, Series A, Vol. 221, pp. 163–198, (1920).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzberg, R.: Fracture Mechanics and Engineering Materials, John Wiley and Sons, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, G.: Fracture Dynamics, Fracturing of Metals, American Society for Metals, Cleveland, pp. 147-166, (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, R. and D. Evans: Fundamentals of Interfacial Engineering, Wiley-VCH, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

Physical Chemistry

  • Atkins, P.: Physical Chemistry, 5th Edition, W.H Freeman and Company, New York, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, T. and P. Reid: Physical Chemistry, Pearson & Benjamin Cummings, (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J.: Determination of the Nature of Molecular Bonding in Silica from Time-Dependent Dielectric Breakdown Data, J. Appl. Physics, 95, 8101 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauling, L.:The Nature of the Chemical Bond, 3rd Edition, Cornel University Press, (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Silbey, R. and R. Alberty: Physical Chemistry, 3rd Edition, John Wiley and Sons (2001).

    Google Scholar 

Solid State Physics

  • Ashcroft, N. and David Mermin: Solid State Physics, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, J.: Solid State Physics, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittel, C.: Introduction to Solid State Physics, 7th Edition, John Wiley and Sons, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J.: Underlying Physics of the Thermochemical E-Model in Describing Low-Field Time-Dependent Dielectric Breakdown in SiO2 Thin Films, J. Appl. Physics, 84, 1513 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turton, R.: The Physics of Solids, Oxford University Press, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Quantum Mechanics

  • Atkins, P. and R. Friedman: Molecular Quantum Mechanics, 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirac, P.: The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th Edition, Oxford Science Publications, (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, D.: Introduction to Quantum Mechanics, Prentice Hall, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, W.: Applied Quantum Mechanics, World Scientific Publishing, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, J.: Quantum Mechanical Treatment of Si-O Bond Breakage in Silica Under Time- Dependent Dielectric Breakdown, IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, 209 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinett, R.: Quantum Mechanics, 2nd Edition, Oxford University Press, (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shift, L.: Quantum Mechanics, McGraw-Hill Book Company, (1949).

    Google Scholar 

Semiconductors and Dielectrics

  • Dumin, D.: Oxide Reliability, A Summary of Silicon Oxide Wearout, Breakdown, and Reliability, World Scientific, (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, A.: Physics and Technology of Semiconductor Devices, John Wiley and Sons, (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matare, H.: Defect Electronics in Semiconductors, Wiley-Interscience, (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Streetman, B. and S. Banerjee: Solid State Electronic Devices, 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sze, S.: Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sze, S.: Semiconductor Devices: Physics and Technology, 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons, (2002).

    Google Scholar 

Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics

  • Desloge, E.: Statistical Physics, Holt, Riehart and Winston, (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase, R.: Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Dover Publications, (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittel, C. and H. Kroemer: Thermal Physics, 2nd Edition, W.H. Freeman and Co., (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrodinger, E.: Statistical Thermodynamics, Dover Publications, (1952).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. W. McPherson .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McPherson, J.W. (2013). Time-to-Failure Models for Selected Failure Mechanisms in Mechanical Engineering. In: Reliability Physics and Engineering. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00122-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00122-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00121-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00122-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics