Abstract
The strong contact hyperfine interaction between a single electron and the nuclear spins in a quantum dot [1–5] represents a severe limitation on its use as a qubit, as we discussed in Sect. 3.3.1. In particular, it results in non-linear, non-Markovian dynamics of the electron-nuclear system [6–9], making the use of the Larmor-precession as a single qubit gate cumbersome. While dynamical decoupling, in essence an extension of the simple spin echo presented in Sect. 3.3.2 to multiple refocusing pulses, could be used to decouple the effects of the nuclear spin bath [10–14], avoiding the contact hyperfine interaction altogether would be a much simpler solution. For some materials, this could be achieved by careful isotopic engineering: examples for group-IV and II–VI materials can be found in Refs. [15–19]. However, In, Ga and As do not possess any spin-0 isotopes, making this approach impossible for the self-assembled quantum dots used in this work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This is true to first order: this term can give rise to spin flips in the x-direction (we can rewrite it in terms of lowering and raising operators along x), though these will be energetically forbidden and therefore only contribute to higher order. We refer to any of the theoretical descriptions of the full central-spin problem for details, e.g. Refs. [1, 4, 26].
- 2.
As opposed to the δ-doping devices, where it would in principle be possible for a single, spurious electron to be present inside the quantum dot, which cannot be distinguished from a single hole as the optical signatures are the same.
References
W. A. Coish and D. Loss. Hyperfine interaction in a quantum dot: Non-Markovian electron spin dynamics. Phys. Rev. B, 70:195340, 2004.
J. R. Petta et al. Coherent manipulation of coupled electron spins in semiconductor quantum dots. Science, 309:2180, 2005.
W. Yao, R.-B. Liu, and L. J. Sham. Theory of electron spin decoherence by interacting nuclear spins in a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. B, 74:195301, 2006.
W. M. Witzel and S. Das Sarma. Quantum theory for electron spin decoherence induced by nuclear spin dynamics in semiconductor quantum computer architectures: Spectral diffusion of localized electron spins in the nuclear solid-state environment. Phys. Rev. B, 74:035322, 2006.
D. Press, K. De Greve, P. McMahon, T. D. Ladd, B. Friess, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, S. Höfling, A. Forchel, and Y. Yamamoto. Ultrafast optical spin echo in a single quantum dot. Nat. Photonics, 4:367, 2010.
I. T. Vink et al. Locking electron spins into magnetic resonance by electron–nuclear feedback. Nat. Phys., 5:764–768, 2009.
C. Latta et al. Confluence of resonant laser excitation and bidirectional quantum-dot nuclear-spin polarization. Nat. Phys., 5:758, 2009.
X. Xu et al. Optically controlled locking of the nuclear field via coherent dark-state spectroscopy. Nature, 459(4):1105, 2009.
T. D. Ladd, D. Press, K. De Greve, P. McMahon, B. Friess, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, S. Höfling, A. Forchel, and Y. Yamamoto. Pulsed nuclear pumping and spin diffusion in a single charged quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:107401, 2010.
L. Viola and S. Lloyd. Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A, 58:2733–2744, 1998.
M.J. Biercuk, H. Uys, A. P. VanDevender, N. Shiga, W. M. Itano, and J. J. Bollinger. Optimized dynamical decoupling in a model quantum memory. Nature, 458:996, 2009.
J. Du, X. Rong, N. Zhao, Y. Wang, J. Yang, and R. B. Liu. Preserving electron spin coherence in solids by optimal dynamical decoupling. Nature, 461:1265, 2009.
G. de Lange, Z. H. Wang, D. Ristè, V. V. Dobrovitski, and R. Hanson. Universal dynamical decoupling of a single solid-state spin from a spin bath. Science, 330(6000):60, 2010.
H. Bluhm, S. Foletti, I. Neder, M. Rudner, D. Mahalu, V. Umansky, and A. Yacoby. Dephasing time of GaAs electron-spin qubits coupled to a nuclear bath exceeding 200 μs. Nat. Phys., 7:109, 2010.
T. D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y. Nakamura, C. Monroe, and J. L. O’Brien. Quantum computers. Nature, 464:45, 2010.
G. Balasubramanian et al. Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond. Nat. Mater., 8:383, 2008.
B. Kane. A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer. Nature, 393:133–137, 1998.
M. G. Borselli, R. S. Ross, A. A. Kiselev, E. T. Croke, K. S. Holabird, P. W. Deelman, L. D. Warren, I. Alvarado-Rodriguez, I. Milosavljevic, F. C. Ku, W. S. Wong, A. E. Schmitz, M. Sokolich, M. F. Gyure, and A. T. Hunter. Measurement of valley splitting in high-symmetry Si/SiGe quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett., 98:123118, 2011.
K. De Greve, S. M. Clark, D. Sleiter, K. Sanaka, T. D. Ladd, M. Panfilova, A. Pawlis, K. Lischka, and Y. Yamamoto. Photon antibunching and magnetospectroscopy of a single fluorine donor in ZnSe. Appl. Phys. Lett., 97:241913, 2010.
D. V. Bulaev and D. Loss. Spin decoherence and relaxation of holes in a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett., 95:076805, 2005.
J. Fischer, W. A. Coish, D. V. Bulaev, and D. Loss. Spin decoherence of a heavy hole coupled to nuclear spins in a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. B, 78:155329, 2008.
B. D. Gerardot et al. Optical pumping of a single hole spin in a quantum dot. Nature, 451:441, 2008.
D. Brunner, B. D. Gerardot, P. A. Dalgarno, G. Wst, K. Karrai, N. G. Stoltz, P. M. Petroff, and R. J. Warburton. A coherent single-hole spin in a semiconductor. Science, 325(5936):70–72, 2009.
P. Fellahi, S. T. Yilmaz, and A. Imamoglu. Measurement of a Heavy-Hole Hyperfine Interaction in InGaAs Quantum Dots Using Resonance Fluorescence. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:257402, 2010.
E. A. Chekhovich, A. B. Krysa, M. S. Skolnick, and A. I. Tartakovskii. Direct measurement of the hole-nuclear spin interaction in single quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:027402, 2010.
R.-B. Liu, W. Yao, and L. J. Sham. Control of electron spin decoherence caused by electron-nuclear spin dynamics in a quantum dot. New J. Phys., 9:226, 2007.
D. Sleiter and W. F. Brinkman. Using holes in GaAs as qubits: An estimate of the Rabi frequency in the presence of an external rf field. Phys. Rev. B, 74:153312, 2006.
K. C. Nowack, F. H. L. Koppens, Yu. V. Nazarov, and L. M. K. Vandersypen. Coherent Control of a Single Electron Spin with Electric Fields. Science, 318:1430, 2007.
S. Nadj-Perge, S. M. Frolov, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, and L. P. Kouwenhoven. Spin–orbit qubit in a semiconductor nanowire. Nature, 468:1084–1087, 2010.
K. De Greve, P. L. McMahon, D. Press, T. D. Ladd, D. Bisping, C. Schneider, M. Kamp, L. Worschech, S. Höfling, A. Forchel, and Y. Yamamoto. Ultrafast coherent control and suppressed nuclear feedback of a single quantum dot hole qubit. Nat. Phys., 7:872, 2011.
R. J. Warburton, C. Schäflein, D. Haft, F. Bickel, A. Lorke, K. Karrai, J. M. Garcia, W Schoenfeld, and P. M. Petroff. Optical emission from a charge-tunable quantum ring. Nature, 405:926, 2000.
S. E. Economou, L. J. Sham, Y. Wu, and D. G. Steel. Proposal for optical U(1) rotations of electron spin trapped in a quantum dot. Phys. Rev. B, 74:205415, 2006.
S. M. Clark, K-M. C. Fu, T. D. Ladd, and Y. Yamamoto. Quantum computers based on electron spins controlled by ultrafast off-resonant single optical pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett., 99:040501, 2007.
M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
B. Eble, C. Testelin, P. Desfonds, F. Bernardot, A. Balocchi, T. Amand, A. Miard, A. Lemaitre, X. Marie, and M. Chamarro. Hole–Nuclear spin interaction in quantum dots. Phys. Rev. Lett., 102:146601, 2009.
C. Testelin, F. Bernardot, B. Eble, and M. Chamarro. Hole–spin dephasing time associated with hyperfine interaction in quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B, 79:195440, 2009.
J. Fischer and D. Loss. Hybridization and Spin Decoherence in Heavy-Hole Quantum Dots. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105:266603, 2010.
Y. G. Semenov, K. N. Borysenko, and K. W. Kim. Spin-phase relaxation of two-dimensional holes localized in a fluctuating potential. Phys. Rev. B, 66:113302, 2002.
M. Syperek, D. R. Yakovlev, A. Greilich, J. Misiewicz, M. Bayer, D. Reuter, and A. D. Wieck. Spin coherence of holes in GaAs/(Al,Ga)As quantum wells. Phys. Rev. Lett., 99:187401, 2007.
D. Heiss, S. Schaeck, H. Huebl, M. Bichler, G. Abstreiter, J. J. Finley, D. V. Bulaev, and D. Loss. Observation of extremely slow hole spin relaxation in self-assembled quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B, 76:241306(R), 2007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Greve, K. (2013). Ultrafast Optical Control of Hole Spin Qubits: Suppressed Nuclear Feedback Effects. In: Towards Solid-State Quantum Repeaters. Springer Theses. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00074-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00074-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00073-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00074-9
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)