Skip to main content

The Post-Process Era in Composition Studies and the Linguistic Turn of the 20th Century

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Investigations in Teaching and Learning Languages

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

  • 1304 Accesses

Abstract

In order to present the post-process era in composition as part of the general phenomenon known as the linguistic turn of the 20th century rather than as only the social turn in composition, in this chapter I point to some epistemological developments in composition studies, developments that underlie and define the process and post-process eras in composition as distinguishable rather than distinct periods in the history of the discipline. I apply the term linguistic turn specifically to the epistemological evolution that has taken place in composition studies and present post-process as a phase of this evolutionary process. Accordingly, I try to pinpoint some crucial changes in the ways writing as meaning making was explained and so to uncover the important epistemological developments that may serve as evidence of the linguistic turn taking place in composition studies, with the post-process era seen as the consequence of a series of such epistemological shifts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkinson, D. 2003. L2 writing in the post-process era: Introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing 12: 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L. and T. Luckman. 1966. Th social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, J. A. 1982. Contemporary composition: The major pedagogical theories. College English 44: 765–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, J. A. 1988. Rhetoric and ideology in the writing class. College English 50: 477–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, J. A. 2003. Rhetorics, poetics, and cultures: Refiguring college English studies. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press. (Original work published by National Council of Teachers of English, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, J. A. and R. P. Inkster. (1980). Current-traditional rhetoric: Paradigm and practice. Freshman English News 8.3: 1–4, 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitzer, L. F. 1968. The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 1: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizzell, P. 1982. Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. Pre/Text 3: 213–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, A. 1998. Theoretical perspectives on writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 18: 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, J. D., L. A. French, and L. K. Hall. 1985. Social influences on cognitive development. In Metacognition, cognition, and human performance: Vol. 1. Theoretical perspectives, eds. D. Forrest-Pressley, G. MacKinnon, and T. Waller, 33–56. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ede, L. and A. Lunsford. 1984. Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication 35: 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emig, J. 1971. The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faigley, L. 1986. Competing theories of process: A critique and a proposal. College English 48: 527–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L. 1981. Problem-solving strategies for writing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L. and J. R. Hayes. 1980a. The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication 31: 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L. and J. R. Hayes. 1980b. The dynamics of the composing process: Making plans and juggling constraints. In Cognitive processes in writing, eds. L. W. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg, 31–50. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flower, L. and J. R. Hayes. 1981. Plans that guide the composing process. In Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written composition: Vol. 2, eds. C. H. Frederiksen and J. F. Dominic, 39–58. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulkerson, R. 1979. Four philosophies of composition. College Composition and Communication 30: 343–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairston, M. 1982. The winds of change: Thomas Khun and the revolution in the teaching of writing. College Composition and Communication 33: 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. 1989. The idea of community in the study of writing. College Composition and Communication 40: 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoblauch, C. H. 1980. Modern composition theory and the rhetorical tradition. Freshman English News 9.2: 3–4, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeFevre, K. B. 1987. Invention as a social act. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leki, I. 2010. Second language writing in English. In Oxford handbook of applied linguistics, ed. R. Kaplan, 100–109. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda, P. K. 2003. Process and post-process: A discursive history. Journal of Second Language Writing 12: 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, S. M. 1987. The making of knowledge in composition: Portrait of an emerging field. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohman, D. G. 1965. Pre-writing: The stage of discovery in the writing process. College Composition and Communication 16: 106–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohman, D. G. and A. O. Wlecke. 1964. Pre-writing: The construction and application of models for concept formation in writing. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. M. Ed. 1967. The linguistic turn: Essays in philosophical method. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saussure, F. de. 1986. Course in general linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1916)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M. and C. Bereiter. 1987. Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. In Advances in applied linguistics: Vol. 2. Reading, writing, and language learning, ed. S. Rosenberg, 142–175. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therborn, G. 1980. The ideology of power and the power of ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trimbur, J. 1994. Taking the social turn: Teaching writing post-process. College Composition and Communication 45: 108–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, W. F. 1981. Composition textbooks and pedagogical theory 1960–80. College English 43: 393–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., E. Thompson, and E. Rosch. 1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, R. E. 1978. Paradigms and problems: Needed research in rhetorical invention. In Research on composing: Points of departure, eds. C. R. Cooper and L. Odell, 29–48. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Zalewski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zalewski, J. (2013). The Post-Process Era in Composition Studies and the Linguistic Turn of the 20th Century. In: GabryÅ›-Barker, D., Piechurska-Kuciel, E., Zybert, J. (eds) Investigations in Teaching and Learning Languages. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00044-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics