Abstract
In order to present the post-process era in composition as part of the general phenomenon known as the linguistic turn of the 20th century rather than as only the social turn in composition, in this chapter I point to some epistemological developments in composition studies, developments that underlie and define the process and post-process eras in composition as distinguishable rather than distinct periods in the history of the discipline. I apply the term linguistic turn specifically to the epistemological evolution that has taken place in composition studies and present post-process as a phase of this evolutionary process. Accordingly, I try to pinpoint some crucial changes in the ways writing as meaning making was explained and so to uncover the important epistemological developments that may serve as evidence of the linguistic turn taking place in composition studies, with the post-process era seen as the consequence of a series of such epistemological shifts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atkinson, D. 2003. L2 writing in the post-process era: Introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing 12: 3–15.
Berger, P. L. and T. Luckman. 1966. Th social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Berlin, J. A. 1982. Contemporary composition: The major pedagogical theories. College English 44: 765–777.
Berlin, J. A. 1988. Rhetoric and ideology in the writing class. College English 50: 477–494.
Berlin, J. A. 2003. Rhetorics, poetics, and cultures: Refiguring college English studies. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press. (Original work published by National Council of Teachers of English, 1996)
Berlin, J. A. and R. P. Inkster. (1980). Current-traditional rhetoric: Paradigm and practice. Freshman English News 8.3: 1–4, 13–14.
Bitzer, L. F. 1968. The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric 1: 1–14.
Bizzell, P. 1982. Cognition, convention, and certainty: What we need to know about writing. Pre/Text 3: 213–243.
Cumming, A. 1998. Theoretical perspectives on writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 18: 61–78.
Day, J. D., L. A. French, and L. K. Hall. 1985. Social influences on cognitive development. In Metacognition, cognition, and human performance: Vol. 1. Theoretical perspectives, eds. D. Forrest-Pressley, G. MacKinnon, and T. Waller, 33–56. New York: Academic Press.
Ede, L. and A. Lunsford. 1984. Audience addressed/audience invoked: The role of audience in composition theory and pedagogy. College Composition and Communication 35: 155–171.
Emig, J. 1971. The composing processes of twelfth graders. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Faigley, L. 1986. Competing theories of process: A critique and a proposal. College English 48: 527–542.
Flower, L. 1981. Problem-solving strategies for writing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Flower, L. and J. R. Hayes. 1980a. The cognition of discovery: Defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication 31: 21–32.
Flower, L. and J. R. Hayes. 1980b. The dynamics of the composing process: Making plans and juggling constraints. In Cognitive processes in writing, eds. L. W. Gregg and E. R. Steinberg, 31–50. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Flower, L. and J. R. Hayes. 1981. Plans that guide the composing process. In Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written composition: Vol. 2, eds. C. H. Frederiksen and J. F. Dominic, 39–58. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fulkerson, R. 1979. Four philosophies of composition. College Composition and Communication 30: 343–348.
Hairston, M. 1982. The winds of change: Thomas Khun and the revolution in the teaching of writing. College Composition and Communication 33: 76–88.
Harris, J. 1989. The idea of community in the study of writing. College Composition and Communication 40: 11–22.
Knoblauch, C. H. 1980. Modern composition theory and the rhetorical tradition. Freshman English News 9.2: 3–4, 11–17.
Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
LeFevre, K. B. 1987. Invention as a social act. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Leki, I. 2010. Second language writing in English. In Oxford handbook of applied linguistics, ed. R. Kaplan, 100–109. New York: Oxford University Press.
Matsuda, P. K. 2003. Process and post-process: A discursive history. Journal of Second Language Writing 12: 65–83.
North, S. M. 1987. The making of knowledge in composition: Portrait of an emerging field. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Rohman, D. G. 1965. Pre-writing: The stage of discovery in the writing process. College Composition and Communication 16: 106–112.
Rohman, D. G. and A. O. Wlecke. 1964. Pre-writing: The construction and application of models for concept formation in writing. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
Rorty, R. M. Ed. 1967. The linguistic turn: Essays in philosophical method. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Saussure, F. de. 1986. Course in general linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1916)
Scardamalia, M. and C. Bereiter. 1987. Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. In Advances in applied linguistics: Vol. 2. Reading, writing, and language learning, ed. S. Rosenberg, 142–175. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Therborn, G. 1980. The ideology of power and the power of ideology. London: Verso.
Trimbur, J. 1994. Taking the social turn: Teaching writing post-process. College Composition and Communication 45: 108–118.
Woods, W. F. 1981. Composition textbooks and pedagogical theory 1960–80. College English 43: 393–409.
Varela, F. J., E. Thompson, and E. Rosch. 1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Young, R. E. 1978. Paradigms and problems: Needed research in rhetorical invention. In Research on composing: Points of departure, eds. C. R. Cooper and L. Odell, 29–48. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zalewski, J. (2013). The Post-Process Era in Composition Studies and the Linguistic Turn of the 20th Century. In: GabryÅ›-Barker, D., Piechurska-Kuciel, E., Zybert, J. (eds) Investigations in Teaching and Learning Languages. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00044-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00044-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-00043-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-00044-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)