Abstract
It has long been considered an historical anomaly that Young’s wave theory was not accepted before 1816. Some scholars claim, however, that this response was not at all unusual, since the theory did not, in fact, deserve to be accepted.1 As I have shown above, however, Young’s theory was not so severely flawed that it should have been completely ignored or rejected. I intend to argue that the principle of interference was rejected at the time for two reasons: 1) some scientists considered it to be a part of the wave theory, which they disliked; 2) others agreed to separate the two but could not imagine a mechanical model of interference of light. It will be shown that both groups misunderstood the principle of interference as a non-Newtonian theory of colors.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Basel AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kipnis, N. (1991). The response to the principle of interference (1801–1815). In: History of the Principle of Interference of Light. Science Networks · Historical Studies, vol 5. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8652-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8652-9_6
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9717-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8652-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive