Abstract
Errors in chromosome distribution in meiosis and mitosis result in cells with missing or extra chromosomes, which can cause birth defects in children and cancer in adults. Chromosome distribution is determined by chromosome attachment to the mitotic spindle (reviewed in [1]). Proper attachment of daughter chromosomes to opposite spindle poles leads to movement to opposite poles in anaphase, with the fortunate consequence that each daughter cell contains one copy of each chromosome. Attachment begins with chance events, in which growing microtubules accidentally encounter a kinetochore, the microtubule attachment site on each chromosome (Fig. 1).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nicklas RB (1997) How cells get the right chromosomes.Science275: 632–637
Hartwell LH, Weinert TA (1989) Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events.Science246: 629–634
McIntosh JR (1991) Structural and mechanical control of mitotic progression.Cold Spring Harbour Symp Quant Biol56: 613–619
Li X, Nicklas RB (1995) Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint.Nature373: 630–632
Nicklas RB, Ward SC, Gorbsky GJ (1995) Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint.J Cell Biol130: 929–939
Gorbsky GJ (1997) Cell cycle checkpoints: arresting progress in mitosis.BioEssays19: 193–197
Rieder CL, Cole RW, Khodjakov A, Sluder G (1995) The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores.J Cell Biol130: 941–948
Wells WAE (1996) The spindle-assembly checkpoint: aiming for a perfect mitosis, every time.Trends Cell Biol6: 228–234
Li R, Murray AW (1991) Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast.Cell66: 519–531
Fang G, Yu H, Kirschner MW (1998) Direct binding of CDC20 protein family members activates the anaphase-promoting complex in mitosis and Gl.Mol Cell2: 163–171
Kallio M, Weinstein J, Daum JR, Burke DJ, Gorbsky GJ (1998) Mammalian p55CDC mediates association of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex, and is involved in regulating anaphase onset and late mitotic events.J Cell Biol141: 1393–1406
Hwang LH, Lau LF, Smith DL, Mistrot CA, Hardwick KG, Hwang ES, Amon A, Murray AW (1998) Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint.Science279: 1041–1044
Kim SH, Lin DP, Matsumoto S, Kitazono A, Matsumoto T (1998) Fission yeast Slpl: an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint.Science279: 1045–1047
Fang G, Yu H, Kirschner MW (1998) The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation.Gene Develop12: 1871–1883
Li Y, Gorbea C, Mahaffey D, Rechsteiner M, Benezra R (1997) MAD2 associates with the cyclo-some/anaphase-promoting complex and inhibits its activity.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA94: 12431–12436
Wassmann K, Benezra R (1998) Mad2 transiently associates with an APC/p55Cdc complex during mitosis.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA95: 11193–11198
Chen RH, Waters JC, Salmon ED, Murray AW (1996) Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMAD2 with unattached kinetochores.Science274: 242–246
Li Y, Benezra R (1996) Identification of a human mitotic checkpoint gene: hsMAD2.Science274: 246–248
Waters JC, Chen R-H, Murray AW, Salmon ED (1998) Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension.J Cell Biol141: 1181–1191
Bousbaa H, Correia L, Gorbsky GJ, Sunkel CE (1997) Mitotic phosphoepitopes are expressed in Kc cells, neuroblasts and isolated chromosomes ofDrosophila melanogaster. J Cell Sci110: 1979–1988
Shapiro PS, Vaisberg E, Hunt AJ, Tolwinski NS, Whalen AM, McIntosh JR, Ahn NG (1998) Activation of the MKK/ERK pathway during somatic cell mitosis: direct interactions of active ERK with kinetochores and regulation of the mitotic 3F3/2 phosphoantigen.J Cell Biol142: 1533–1545
Waters JC, Chen R-H, Murray AW, Gorbsky GJ, Salmon ED, Nicklas RB (1999) Phosphorylated kinetochores bind Mad2in vitro:A link between error detection and checkpoint action in mitosis.Curr Biol9: 649–652
Chen RH, Shevchenko A, Mann M, Murray AW (1998) Spindle checkpoint protein xmadl recruits xmad2 to unattached kinetochores.J Cell Biol143: 283–295
Taylor SS, Ha E, McKeon F (1998) The human homologue of Bub3 is required for kinetochore localization of Bubl and a Mad3/Bubl-related protein kinase.J Cell Biol142: 1–11
Farr KA, Hoyt MA (1998) Bublp kinase activates theSaccharomyces cerevisiaespindle assembly checkpoint.Mol Cell Biol18: 2738–2747
Zecevic M, Catling AD, Eblen ST, Renzi L, Hittle JC, Yen TJ, Gorbsky GJ, Weber MJ (1998) Active MAP kinase in mitosis: localization at kinetochores and association with the motor protein CENP-E.J Cell Biol142: 1547–1558
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Basel AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nicklas, R.B. (2000). Chromosomes in mitosis: chance and checkpoint. In: Olmo, E., Redi, C.A. (eds) Chromosomes Today. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8484-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8484-6_6
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9587-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8484-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive