Abstract
We associate waveform-relocated background seismicity and aftershocks with the 3-D shapes of late Quaternary fault zones in southern California. Major earthquakes that can slip more than several meters, aftershocks, and near-fault background seismicity mostly rupture different surfaces within these fault zones. Major earthquakes rupture along the mapped traces of the late Quaternary faults, called the principal slip zones (PSZs). Aftershocks occur either on or in the immediate vicinity of the PSZs, typically within zones that are ±2-km wide. In contrast, the near-fault background seismicity is mostly accommodated on a secondary heterogeneous network of small slip surfaces, and forms spatially decaying distributions extending out to distances of ±10 km from the PSZs. We call the regions where the enhanced rate of background seismicity occurs, the seismic damage zones. One possible explanation for the presence of the seismic damage zones and associated seismicity is that the damage develops as faults accommodate bends and geometrical irregularities in the PSZs. The seismic damage zones mature and reach their finite width early in the history of a fault, during the first few kilometers of cumulative offset. Alternatively, the similarity in width of seismic damage zones suggests that most fault zones are of almost equal strength, although the amount of cumulative offset varies widely. It may also depend on the strength of the fault zone, the time since the last major earthquake as well as other parameters. In addition, the seismic productivity appears to be influenced by the crustal structure and heat flow, with more extensive fault networks in regions of thin crust and high heat flow.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ando, R. and Yamashita, T. (2007), Effects of mesoscopic-scale fault structure on dynamic earthquake ruptures: Dynamic formation of geometrical complexity of earthquake faults, J. Geophys. Res. 112, B09303, doi:10.1029/2006JB004612.
Ben-Zion, Y. and Lyakhovsky, V. (2006), Analysis of aftershocks in a lithospheric model with seismogenic zone governed by damage rheology, Geophys. J. Int. 165, 197–210 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02878.x.
Chambon, G., Schmittbuhl, J., Corfdir, A., Orellana, N., Diraison, M. and Géraud, Y. (2006), The thickness of faults: From laboratory experiments to field-scale observations, Tectonophysics 426, 77–94.
Felzer, K.R. and Brodsky, E.E. (2006), Decay of aftershock density with distance indicates triggering by dynamic stress, Nature 441, 735–738.
Frankel, A.D. et al. (2002), Documentation for the 2002 Update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps, Tech. Rep. Open-File Report 02-420, US Geological Survey.
Hardebeck, J.L. and Michael, A. (2006), Spatial and temporal stress inversion, J. Geophys. Res 111, B11310, doi: 10.1029/2005JB004144.
Helmstetter, A., Ouillon, G. and Sornette, D. (2003), Are aftershocks of large California earthquakes diffusing?, J. Geophys. Res. 108, doi:10:1029/2003JB002503.
Jennings, C.W. (1994), Fault activity map of California and adjacent areas: California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Geologic Data Map No. 6, scale 1:750,000.
Lin, G., Shearer, P.M. and Hauksson, E. (2007), Applying a three-dimensional velocity model, waveform cross correlation, and cluster analysis to locate southern California seismicity from 1981 to 2005, J. Geophys. Res. 112, B12309, doi:10.1029/2007 JB004986.
Liu, J., Sieh, K. and Hauksson, E. (2003), A structural interpretation of the aftershock “cloud” of the 1992 M w 7.3 Landers Earthquake, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93,3, 1333–1344.
Marsan, D. (2006), Can coseismic stress variability suppress seismicity shadows? Insights from a rate-and-state friction model, J. Geophys. Res. 111, B06305, doi:10.1029/2005 JB004060.
Nazareth, J.J. and Hauksson, E. (2004), The seismogenic thickness of the southern California crust, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94, 940–960.
Plesch, A., Shaw, J.H., Benson, C., Bryant, W.A., Carena, S., Cooke, M., Dolan, J., Fuis, G., Gath, E., Grant, L., Hauksson, E., Jordan, T., Kamerling, M., Legg, M., Lindvall, S., Magistrale, H., Nicholson, C., Niemi, N., Oskin, M., Perry, S., Planansky, G., Rockwell, T., Shearer, P., Sorlien, C., Süss, M.P., Suppe, J., Treiman, J., and Yeats, R. (2007), Community fault model (CFM) for southern California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., Dec., 97, 1793–1802.
Press, H.W., Teukolsky. S.A., Vetterling, W.T. and Flannery, B.P., Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77, The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition, Vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY (1997)) 1447 pp.
Provost, A.-S. and Houston, H. (2001), Orientation of the stress field surrounding the creeping section of the San Andreas Fault: Evidence for a narrow mechanically weak fault zone, J. Geophys. Res., 106,B6, 11,373–11,386.
Sagy, A., Brodsky, E.E. and Axen, G.J. (2007), Evolution of fault-surface roughness with slip, Geol. 35, 283–286.
Sieh, K., Jones, L.M., Hauksson, E., Hudnut, K., Eberhart-Phillips, D., Heaton, T.H., Hough, S., Hutton, K., Kanamori, H., Lilje, A., Lindvall, S., McGill, S.F., Mori, J., Rubin, C., Spotilla, J.A., Stock, J., Thio, H.K., Treiman, J., Wernicke, B. and Zachariasen, J. (1993), Near-field investigations of the Landers earthquake sequence April–July 1992, Science 260, 171–175.
Shaw, B.E. (2004), Variation of large elastodynamic earthquakes on complex fault systems, G. Res. Lett., 31, L18609, doi:10.1029/ 2004GL019943.
Shaw, B.E. (2006), Initiation propagation and termination of elastodynamic ruptures associated with segmentation of faults and shaking hazard, J. Geophys. Res. 111, B08302, doi:10.1029/ 2005JB004093.
Sibson, R.H. (2003), Thickness of the seismic slip zone, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93,3. 1169–1178; doi:10.1785/0120020061.
Spotila, J., Niemi, A., Brady, R., House, M., Buscher, J. and Oskin, M. (2007), Long-term continental deformation associated with transpressive plate motion: The San Andreas fault, Geology 35,11, 967–970; doi:10.1130/G23816A.1
Utsu, T., Statistical Features of Seismicity, Int’l. Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology V. 81B: Centennial publication of the Intl’. Assn. of Seism. and Physics of the Earth’s Interior (P. Jennings, H. Kanamori, and W. Lee, eds), pp. 719–732 (2003).
Wesnousky, S.G. (1990), Seismicity as a function of cumulative geologic offset: Some observations from southern California, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 80, 1374–1381.
Wessel, P. and Smith, W.H.F. (1998), New version of the generic mapping tools released, EOS 79, 579.
Wesson, R.L., Bakun, W.H. and Perkins, D.M. (2003), Association of earthquakes and faults in the San Francisco Bay Area using Bayesian inference, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 1306–1322.
Wiemer, S. (2001), A software package to analyze seismicity: ZMAP, Seis. Res. Lett., 373–382.
Woessner, J. and Hauksson, E. (2006), Associating Southern California seismicity with Late Quaternary Faults: Implications for Seismicity Parameters (abstract), Southern California Earthquake Center Annual Meeting, Palm Springs, CA.
Wood, H.O. (1916), The earthquake problem in the Western United States, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. VI, 196–217.
Zaliapin, I., Gabrielov, A., Keilis-Borok, V. and Wong, H. (2007), Aftershock identification, arXiv:0712.1303v1 [physics.geo-ph].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Birkhäuser / Springer Basel AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hauksson, E. (2010). Spatial Separation of Large Earthquakes, Aftershocks, and Background Seismicity: Analysis of Interseismic and Coseismic Seismicity Patterns in Southern California. In: Savage, M.K., Rhoades, D.A., Smith, E.G.C., Gerstenberger, M.C., Vere-Jones, D. (eds) Seismogenesis and Earthquake Forecasting: The Frank Evison Volume II. Pageoph Topical Volumes. Springer, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0346-0500-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0346-0500-7_10
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Publisher Name: Springer, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0346-0499-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-0346-0500-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)