Skip to main content
  • 642 Accesses

Abstract

Latin American cities and buildings continue to figure prominently in the history of architecture. Indeed, attention to architectural production in that part of the world has increased during the first decade of the 21st century. It can be argued that contemporary architects from Latin America are receiving more international recognition than ever before. Established European and North American magazines such as Architectural Review, Architectural Record, Domus and, even, non-specialised popular monthly publications such as Casabella and Wallpaper have dedicated numerous pages and special editions to recently finished buildings in Latin America. Similarly, there has been a proliferation of monographs about the work of contemporary Latin American architects; indeed, this book forms part of such a body of literature. What is more, architects from Latin American countries have won virtually all major architectural awards in the world in the past ten years.1 The list of achievements could continue if I were to mention conferences, lecture series and visiting professorships at prestigious universities around the world. However, I do not intend to highlight the achievements of architects from Latin America. Instead, I would like to draw attention to the way in which such a degree of renewed international attention disrupts the somewhat homogenous image suggested by the banner ‘Latin American architecture&. That is because the focus of such renewed attention has been diverted to new areas of architectural production. Rather than concentrating only on buildings produced during the middle years of the 20th century, by a reduced group of talented and enthusiastic modernist architects, recent publications focus on a younger generation of architects whose work differs greatly from that of their modernist predecessors. Not only is variation found in the form of buildings but, more importantly, in the themes and aspirations of contemporary young architects who work in some of the largest cities in the world, in conditions of poverty — and immense wealth -/as well as in situations of social and political instability. The buildings designed by architects in Latin America during the past 20 years continue to display great formal creativity, but the above-mentioned conditions of practice demand more political awareness. As a result, schemes have become less ambitious in scale and more specific in scope. However, the nature of their work and the conditions of practice in contemporary Latin American countries impede the construction of a homogenous continental identity; even the existence of national identities is challenged by the diversity of architectural practices that participate in the continuous re-shaping of cities in Latin America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. Rogelio Salmona received the Alvar Aalto Medal in 2003. The Mexican firm Higuera + Sanchez won the Golden Lion at the 2006 Venice Architectural Biennial and Alejandro Aravena received the Silver Lion at the next edition in 2008. Solano Benitez won the BSI Swiss Architectural Award in 2008. José Cruz Ovalle won the Spirit of Nature Wood Architecture Award in 2008 after winning the Bienal Iberoameri-cana de Arquitectura y Urbanismo in 2004, a prize which Colombian architect Giancarlo Mazzanti also received in 2008 along with the first prize at Bienal Panamericana de Arquitectura. Angelo Bucci and his team received second place at the 2008 Holcim Award. Yet, the most renowned of all was the Pritzker Prize given to Paulo Mendes da Rocha in 2006-an honour that he shares with two other Latin American architects: Luis Barragán (1980) and Oscar Niemeyer (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The first sentence of Brazil&s Modern Architecture reads: ‘Brazilian architecture is famous, but it is a fame that rests upon the work of a few architects — Oscar Niemeyer, Lucio Costa, Affonso Reidy and one or two others — built in the mid-20th century&. See Andreoli, E. and A. Forty (eds.) Brazil&s Modern Architecture. London: Phaidon, 2004, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Fraser, V., Building the New World: Studies in the Modern Architecture of Latin America 1930-1960. London/New York: Verso, 2000, p. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Fraser, V .,.Building the New World: Studies in the Modern Architecture of Latin America 1930-1960. London/New York: Verso, 2000, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Holston, J., The Modernist City: An Anthropological Critique of Brasilia, Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holston criticises the fact that the rodoviária has been transformed by its daily users into a place of unusual characteristics: simultaneously a transport interchange, a market place and a town square. For Holston, a transport interchange can neither replace the functions of a market place nor can it serve as a town square. Consequently, rather than positive popular appropriations of the space of the rodoviária are seen negatively: they undermine the principles of modern architecture.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See the statement for the inclusion of Brasilia in the World Heritage List published by UNESCO. See UNESCO, World Heritage List No. 445,1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Anderson, B., Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London/New York: Verso, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fraser, V., Building the New World: Studies in the Modern Architecture of Latin America 1930-1960. London/New York: Verso, 2000, p. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A previous monograph had been written by Sibyl Moholy-Nagy in 1964; however, as P. Villanueva points out, it was written before C. R. Villanueva had completed all his major projects. See Villanueva, P., Carlos Raul Villanueva. Sevilla: Tanais, 2000. — English edition: Carlos Raul Villanueva, Basel: Birkhäuser, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fraser, V., Building the New World: Studies in the Modern Architecture of Latin America 1930-1960. London/New York: Verso, 2000, p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  12. All my comments and quotations are taken from the third edition published in the year 2000. The titles of some chapters were changed, and new chapters were added, in this expanded edition published initially in 1996 and re-printed in 1997,1999 and 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Curtis, W. J. R., Modern Architecture since 1900. London: Phaidon, (1982) 2000, p. 491.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Curtis, W. J. R., Modern Architecture since 1900. London: Phaidon, (1982) 2000. p. 493.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Curtis, W. J. R.,. Modern Architecture since 1900. London: Phaidon, (1982) 2000, p. 567.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Curtis, W. J. R., Modern Architecture since 1900. London: Phaidon, (1982) 2000, p. 635. This chapter was not included in the first edition but was added later.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Pratt, M. L., Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. London: Routledge, 1992.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Small budgets prevent exhilarating formal explorations and the use of advanced technologies which, in traditional architectural terms, leads to the production of boring buildings.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Birkhäuser Verlag AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hernández, F. (2010). Introduction. In: Beyond Modernist Masters: Contemporary Architecture in Latin America. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0346-0495-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0346-0495-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-8769-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-0346-0495-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics