Skip to main content

Scrutable Robot Actions Using a Hierarchical Ontological Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Graph-Based Representation and Reasoning (ICCS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13403))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 270 Accesses

Abstract

We place ourselves in the context of representing knowledge inside the cognitive model of a robot that needs to reason about its actions. We propose a new ontological transformation system able to model different levels of knowledge granularity. This model will allow to unfold the sequences of actions the robot performs for better scrutability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baddeley, A.: The concept of episodic memory. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 356(1413), 1345–1350 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bonet, B., Geffner, H.: Planning with incomplete information as heuristic search in belief space. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems, pp. 52–61 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonet, B., Geffner, H.: Planning under partial observability by classical replanning: theory and experiments. In: Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Botea, A., Enzenberger, M., Müller, M., Schaeffer, J.: Macro-FF: Improving AI planning with automatically learned macro-operators. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 24, 581–621 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bryce, D., Kambhampati, S., Smith, D.E.: Planning graph heuristics for belief space search. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 26, 35–99 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Byrne, R.M.: Counterfactuals in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Evidence from human reasoning. In: IJCAI, pp. 6276–6282 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cashmore, M., Collins, A., Krarup, B., Krivic, S., Magazzeni, D., Smith, D.: Towards explainable AI planning as a service. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.05059 (2019)

  8. Chakraborti, T., Sreedharan, S., Kambhampati, S.: The emerging landscape of explainable AI planning and decision making. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.11697 (2020)

  9. Cimatti, A., Pistore, M., Roveri, M., Traverso, P.: Weak, strong, and strong cyclic planning via symbolic model checking. Artif. Intell. 147(1–2), 35–84 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Collins, A., Michalski, R.: The logic of plausible reasoning: a core theory. Cogn. Sci. 13(1), 1–49 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Croitoru, M., Compatangelo, E., Mellish, C.: Hierarchical knowledge integration using layered conceptual graphs. In: Dau, F., Mugnier, M.-L., Stumme, G. (eds.) ICCS-ConceptStruct 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3596, pp. 267–280. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11524564_18

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Das, D., Banerjee, S., Chernova, S.: Explainable AI for robot failures: generating explanations that improve user assistance in fault recovery. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 351–360 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Erol, K., Hendler, J.A., Nau, D.S.: Semantics for hierarchical task-network planning. Maryland Univ College Park Inst for Systems Research, Technical Report (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fox, M., Long, D., Magazzeni, D.: Explainable planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.10256 (2017)

  15. Freitas, A., Schmidt, D., Meneguzzi, F., Vieira, R., Bordini, R.H.: Using ontologies as semantic representations of hierarchical task network planning domains. In: Proceedings of WWW, p. 124 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Galindo, C., Fernandez-Madrigal, J.A., Gonzalez, J.: Improving efficiency in mobile robot task planning through world abstraction. IEEE Trans. Robot. 20(4), 677–690 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghallab, M., Nau, D., Traverso, P.: Automated Planning: theory and practice. Elsevier (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mugnier, M.L., Chein, M.: Conceptual graphs: fundamental notions. Revue d’intelligence artificielle 6(4), 365–406 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Jedwabny .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jedwabny, M., Bisquert, P., Croitoru, M. (2022). Scrutable Robot Actions Using a Hierarchical Ontological Model. In: Braun, T., Cristea, D., Jäschke, R. (eds) Graph-Based Representation and Reasoning. ICCS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13403. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16663-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16663-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16662-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16663-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics