Skip to main content

Topical Anesthesia in Office-Based Laryngeal Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Office-Based Laryngeal Surgery

Abstract

The resurgence of office-based laryngeal surgery is ascribed in part to the successful application of topical anesthesia to the upper airway. Several topical anesthetics are readily available for use by otolaryngologists, and these are classified as amides such as lidocaine, prilocaine, and etidocaine, and esters such as tetracaine, benzocaine, and procaine. Each of these topical anesthetics has a recommended dosage, time of onset of action, and duration. Topical anesthesia to the pharynx is commonly administered by spraying the oral cavity, oropharynx, and hypopharynx with 4% lidocaine, or Cetacaine (Cetylite, Pennsauken, NJ), a combination of benzocaine 14%, butamben 2%, and tetracaine hydrochloride 2%. Alternatively, topical anesthesia may be applied directly by using a cotton ball held by a curved forcep at the base of the tongue, epiglottis, and even pyriform sinuses. Similarly, topical anesthesia to the larynx may be administered using several methods. These include dripping the local anesthetic via the working channel of the flexible nasopharyngoscope, dispersing the local anesthetic via a small catheter introduced through the working channel of the flexible nasopharyngoscope, or delivering the local anesthetic via a curved suction or cannula introduced perorally while asking the patient to phonate, breathe or gargle. Other commonly described techniques include the use of a pressurized nebulizer to inhale the anesthetic, or injection of the local anesthetic into the airway using a needle inserted percutaneously via the cricothyroid membrane or trachea. Nerve block of the internal laryngeal branches of the superior laryngeal nerves is used less frequently but can be extremely effective.

There is no consensus on the best anesthetic approach/technique for unsedated office-based laryngeal surgery. The choice of approach/technique is left to the discretion of the surgeon who needs to take into consideration patient-related factors such as anatomy and tolerance, as well as comorbidities. This chapter reviews the methods used to apply topical anesthesia to the upper airway. The effect of topical anesthesia on the sensation and function of the laryngo-pharyngeal complex is reviewed, and associated systemic toxicities are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zeitels SM. The history and development of phonomicrosurgery. In: Sataloff RT, editor. Professional voice: the science and art of clinical care. 4th ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2017. p. 1347–69.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Erickson JC III. Surface anesthesia of the airway and larynx. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1964;2(3):709–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bredenkamp JK, Abemayor E, Wackym PA, Ward PH. Tonsillectomy under local anesthesia: a safe and effective alternative. Am J Otolaryngol. 1990;11(1):18–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jourdy DN, Kacker A. Regional anesthesia for office-based procedures in otorhinolaryngology. Anesthesiol Clin. 2010;28(3):457–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang SX, Simpson CB. Anesthesia for office procedures. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2013;46(1):13–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Woo P. Office-based laryngeal procedures. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2006;39(1):111–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frosh AC, Jayaraj S, Porter G, Almeyda J. Is local anaesthesia actually beneficial in flexible fibreoptic nasendoscopy? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1998;23(3):259–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Özkırış M, Aydın R, Gencer ZK, Saydam L. Comparison of topical anesthetic effects of lidocaine, prilocaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine in transnasal fiberoptic nasopharyngolaryngoscopy. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2014;28(3):e141–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bourolias C, Gkotsis A, Kontaxakis A, Tsoukarelis P. Lidocaine spray vs tetracaine solution for transnasal fiber-optic laryngoscopy. Am J Otolaryngol. 2010;31(2):114–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wellenstein DJ, van der Wal RA, Schutte HW, et al. Topical anesthesia for endoscopic office-based procedures of the upper aerodigestive tract. J Voice. 2019;33(5):732–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zainudin BM, Rafia MH, Sufarlan AW. Topical nasal anaesthesia for fibreoptic bronchoscopy: lignocaine spray or gel? Singap Med J. 1993;34(2):148–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu CT. Gauze pledgetting versus endoscopic-guided aerosolized spray for nasal anesthesia before transnasal EGD: a prospective, randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71(1):11–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sohmer B, Bryson GL, Bencze S, Scharf MM. EMLA cream is an effective topical anesthetic for bronchoscopy. Can Respir J. 2004;11(8):587–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Amornyotin S, Srikureja W, Chalayonnavin W, Kongphlay S, Chatchawankitkul S. Topical viscous lidocaine solution versus lidocaine spray for pharyngeal anesthesia in unsedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Endoscopy. 2009;41(07):581–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan CK, Fok KL, Poon CM. Flavored anesthetic lozenge versus Xylocaine spray used as topical pharyngeal anesthesia for unsedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(4):897–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Colman MF, Reynolds R. The use of topical cocaine to prevent laryngospasm after general anesthesia on endoscopy procedures. Laryngoscope. 1985;95(4):474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hogikyan ND. Transnasal endoscopic examination of the subglottis and trachea using topical anesthesia in the otolaryngology clinic. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(7):1170–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosen CA, Amin MR, Sulica L, et al. Advances in office-based diagnosis and treatment in laryngology. Laryngoscope. 2009;119(2):S185–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thawley SE. Nebulized anesthesia for the nose, pharynx, larynx, and trachea. Laryngoscope. 1987;97(4):499–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Christoforidis AJ, Tomashefski JF, Mitchell RI. Use of an ultrasonic nebulizer for the application of oropharyngeal, laryngeal and tracheobronchial anesthesia. Chest. 1971;59(6):629–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Noitasaeng P, Vichitvejpaisal P, Kaosombatwattana U, Tassanee J, Suwannee S. Comparison of spraying and nebulized lidocaine in patients undergoing esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy: a randomized trial. J Med Assoc Thail. 2016;99(5):462–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Perkins EL, Basu S, Garcia GJ, Buckmire RA, Shah RN, Kimbell JS. Ideal particle sizes for inhaled steroids targeting vocal granulomas: preliminary study using computational fluid dynamics. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;158(3):511–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Naunheim MR, Woo P. Topical anesthetic techniques in office-based laryngeal surgery: a comparison of patient preferences. Laryngoscope. 2020;130(1):166–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hamdan A, Ghanem A, Khalifeh E. Tolerance of patients using different approaches in laryngoscopic office-based procedure. J Voice. 2021:S0892-1997(20)30456-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.voice.2020.12.009.

  25. Chee C, Arshad S, Singh S, Mistry S, Hamdy S. The influence of chemical gustatory stimuli and oral anaesthesia on healthy human pharyngeal swallowing. Chem Senses. 2005;30(5):393–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Raphael JH, Stanley GD, Langton JA. Effects of topical benzocaine and lignocaine on upper airway reflex sensitivity. Anaesthesia. 1996;51(2):114–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liistro G, STtãnescu DC, Veriter C, Rodenstein DO, D’Odemont JP. Upper airway anesthesia anduces airflow aimitation in awake humans. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146(3):581–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ho AM, Chung DC, To EW, Karmakar MK. Total airway obstruction during local anesthesia in a non-sedated patient with a compromised airway. Can J Anesth. 2004;51(8):838–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Davies DW, Moylan SL, O’Sullivan G. Topical anaesthesia of the larynx: cocaine or lignocaine? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1992;9(5):393–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Altintaş F, Bozkurt P, Kaya G, Akkan G. Lidocaine 10% in the endotracheal tube cuff: blood concentrations, haemodynamic and clinical effects. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2000;17(7):436–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mihara T, Uchimoto K, Morita S, Goto T. The efficacy of lidocaine to prevent laryngospasm in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2014;69(12):1388–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rubin AD, Shah A, Moyer CA, Johns MM. The effect of topical anesthesia on vocal fold motion. J Voice. 2009;23(1):128–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mahajan RP, Murty GE, Singh P, Aitkenhead AR. Effect of topical anaesthesia on the motor performance of vocal cords as assessed by tussometry. Anaesthesia. 1994;49(12):1028–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Maxwell MJ, English JD, Moppett IK, McGlashan JA, Norris AM. Vocalization assessed by electrolaryngography is unaffected by topical lidocaine anesthesia: a prospective, crossover, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2012;114(4):785–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang CC, Chen SH. Impact of topical anesthesia on acoustic characteristics of voice during laryngeal telescopic examination. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;132(1):110–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Postma GN, Cohen JT, Belafsky PC, et al. Transnasal esophagoscopy: revisited (over 700 consecutive cases). Laryngoscope. 2005;115(2):321–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sulica L, Rosen CA, Postma GN, et al. Current practice in injection augmentation of the vocal folds: indications, treatment principles, techniques, and complications. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(2):319–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Long H, Greller H, Mercurio-Zappala M, Nelson LS, Hoffman RS. Medicinal use of cocaine: a shifting paradigm over 25 years. Laryngoscope. 2004;114(9):1625–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schenck NL. Local anesthesia in otolaryngology: a re-evaluation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1975;84(1):65–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kouba DJ, LoPiccolo MC, Alam M, et al. Guidelines for the use of local anesthesia in office-based dermatologic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74(6):1201–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rosenberg PH, Heinonen J, Takasaki M. Lidocaine concentration in blood after topical anaesthesia of the upper respiratory tract. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1980;24(2):125–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Schmalbach CE. Patient safety and anesthesia considerations for office-based otolaryngology procedures. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 2019;52(3):379–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. McCaughey W. Adverse effects of local anaesthetics. Drug Saf. 1992;7(3):178–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vessely MB, Zitsch RP III. Topical anesthetic-induced methemoglobinemia: a case report and review of the literature. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;108(6):763–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hieger MA, Afeld JL, Cumpston KL, Wills BK. Topical benzocaine and methemoglobinemia. Am J Ther. 2017;24(5):e596–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Taleb M, Ashraf Z, Valavoor S, Tinkel J. Evaluation and management of acquired methemoglobinemia associated with topical benzocaine use. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2013;13(5):325–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Whited C, Cohen SM. Nasal tetracaine spray–induced methemoglobinemia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146(4):678–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdul-latif Hamdan .

1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Transnasal application of topical anesthesia. Note the laryngeal gargle dispersing the anesthetic solution in the larynx and pharynx (MP4 19501 kb)

Transoral application of topical anesthesia (MP4 1834 kb)

Transcervical (percutaneous) injection of the topical anesthetic (2% lidocaine) via the cricothyroid membrane (MP4 21779 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hamdan, Al., Sataloff, R.T., Hawkshaw, M.J. (2022). Topical Anesthesia in Office-Based Laryngeal Surgery. In: Office-Based Laryngeal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91936-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91936-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91935-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91936-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics