Abstract
A cerebral aneurysm is a bulge on the wall of the blood vessel due to localized weakness of the vessel (Brisman et al. N Engl J Med. 355(9):928–39, 2006). The prevalence of cerebral aneurysms in the general population is 3–5% with approximate 1% risk of rupture per year. Ruptured aneurysms lead to great morbidity and mortality; hence, treatment before rupture must be considered. It has been well established that treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms will impact long-term outcomes (International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. N Engl J Med. 339(24):1725–33, 1998); however, the operative risk of 2–5% is not negligible. Several treatment options exist to disrupt intrasaccular flow dynamics, which will be discussed in this chapter. The treatment options for saccular disruption and aneurysm closure depend on several factors such as the aneurysm characteristics (aneurysm type, morphology, size, and location) as well as the aneurysm flow dynamics. Understanding these factors will optimize the choice of treatment and reduce operative risks. In this chapter, we will also discuss the available flow disruptors including those under investigation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D’Souza S. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015;27(3):222–40.
Yamashita M, et al. Cerebral dissecting aneurysms in patients with moyamoya disease. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg. 1983;58(1):120–5.
Beck J, et al. Difference in configuration of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms determined by biplanar digital subtraction angiography. Acta Neurochir. 2003;145(10):861–5. discussion 865
Hademenos GJ, et al. Anatomical and morphological factors correlating with rupture of intracranial aneurysms in patients referred for endovascular treatment. Neuroradiology. 1998;40(11):755–60.
Morita A, et al. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(26):2474–82.
Sadatomo T, et al. Morphological differences between ruptured and unruptured cases in middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(3):602–9.
Ujiie H, et al. Is the aspect ratio a reliable index for predicting the rupture of a saccular aneurysm? Neurosurgery. 2001;48(3):495–502. discussion 502-3
Elsharkawy A, Hernesniemi J. Not all roads lead to Rome…. World Neurosurg. 2013;80(6):806–7.
Wiebers DO, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362(9378):103–10.
Weir B. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a review. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(1):3–42.
Ji T, et al. Current status of the treatment of blood blister-like aneurysms of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery: a review. Int J Med Sci. 2017;14(4):390–402.
Frösen J, et al. Flow-induced, inflammation-mediated arterial wall remodeling in the formation and progression of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;47(1):E21.
Robertson AM, et al. Diversity in the strength and structure of unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015;43(7):1502–15.
Cebral JR, et al. Regional mapping of flow and wall characteristics of intracranial aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44(12):3553–67.
Walcott BP, et al. Predictive modeling and in vivo assessment of cerebral blood flow in the management of complex cerebral aneurysms. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016;36(6):998–1003.
Dmytriw AA, et al. Endosaccular flow disruption: a new frontier in endovascular aneurysm management. Neurosurgery. 2019;86(2):170–81.
Molyneux AJ, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet. 2005;366(9488):809–17.
Chung J, et al. Microsurgical clipping of unruptured middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms: incidence of and risk factors for procedure-related complications. World Neurosurg. 2015;83(5):666–72.
Dmytriw AA, et al. Endosaccular flow disruption: a new frontier in endovascular aneurysm management. Neurosurgery. 2020;86(2):170–81.
Klisch J, et al. The woven EndoBridge cerebral aneurysm embolization device (WEB II): initial clinical experience. Neuroradiology. 2011;53(8):599–607.
Zanaty M, et al. Off-label use of the WEB device. World Neurosurg. 2020;134:e1047–52.
Fiorella D, et al. Interobserver variability in the assessment of aneurysm occlusion with the WEB aneurysm embolization system. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(8):591–5.
Pierot L, et al. Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB: results of the WEBCAST study. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(5):1250.
Lv X, Zhang Y, Jiang W. Systematic review of woven EndoBridge for wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: complications, adequate occlusion rate, morbidity, and mortality. World Neurosurg. 2018;110:20–5.
Pierot L, et al. Aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of two prospective, multicenter series: 3-year follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021;13(4):363–8.
Fiorella D, et al. Demographic, procedural and 30-day safety results from the WEB Intra-saccular Therapy Study (WEB-IT). J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(12):1191–6.
van Rooij SBT, et al. The new low-profile WEB 17 system for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: first clinical experiences. Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(5):859–63.
Bhogal P, et al. The Medina embolic device: Karolinska experience. Interv Neuroradiol. 2018;24(1):4–13.
Sourour NA, et al. Medina® embolization device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: safety and angiographic effectiveness at 6 months. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(2):155–62.
Aguilar Perez M, et al. The Medina embolic device: early clinical experience from a single center. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(1):77–87.
Piotin M, et al. The LUNA aneurysm embolization system for intracranial aneurysm treatment: short-term, mid-term and long-term clinical and angiographic results. J NeuroInterv Surg. 2018;10(12):e34.
Kraitem A, et al. O-028 the intrasaccular seal© device: improved flexibility and healing. J NeuroInterv Surg. 2020;12(Suppl 1):A20.
van Rooij WJ, et al. WEB treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(9):1679–83.
Asnafi S, et al. Efficacy and safety of the woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(12):2287–92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ilorah, C., Ezepue, C., Alshekhlee, A. (2022). Future of Aneurysm Surgery: Flow Disruption. In: Edgell, R.C., M. Christopher, K. (eds) Neurointervention in the Medical Specialties. Current Clinical Neurology. Humana, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87428-5_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87428-5_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87427-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87428-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)