Skip to main content

Future of Aneurysm Surgery: Flow Disruption

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neurointervention in the Medical Specialties

Part of the book series: Current Clinical Neurology ((CCNEU))

  • 826 Accesses

Abstract

A cerebral aneurysm is a bulge on the wall of the blood vessel due to localized weakness of the vessel (Brisman et al. N Engl J Med. 355(9):928–39, 2006). The prevalence of cerebral aneurysms in the general population is 3–5% with approximate 1% risk of rupture per year. Ruptured aneurysms lead to great morbidity and mortality; hence, treatment before rupture must be considered. It has been well established that treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms will impact long-term outcomes (International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. N Engl J Med. 339(24):1725–33, 1998); however, the operative risk of 2–5% is not negligible. Several treatment options exist to disrupt intrasaccular flow dynamics, which will be discussed in this chapter. The treatment options for saccular disruption and aneurysm closure depend on several factors such as the aneurysm characteristics (aneurysm type, morphology, size, and location) as well as the aneurysm flow dynamics. Understanding these factors will optimize the choice of treatment and reduce operative risks. In this chapter, we will also discuss the available flow disruptors including those under investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D’Souza S. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2015;27(3):222–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamashita M, et al. Cerebral dissecting aneurysms in patients with moyamoya disease. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg. 1983;58(1):120–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beck J, et al. Difference in configuration of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms determined by biplanar digital subtraction angiography. Acta Neurochir. 2003;145(10):861–5. discussion 865

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hademenos GJ, et al. Anatomical and morphological factors correlating with rupture of intracranial aneurysms in patients referred for endovascular treatment. Neuroradiology. 1998;40(11):755–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Morita A, et al. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(26):2474–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sadatomo T, et al. Morphological differences between ruptured and unruptured cases in middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(3):602–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ujiie H, et al. Is the aspect ratio a reliable index for predicting the rupture of a saccular aneurysm? Neurosurgery. 2001;48(3):495–502. discussion 502-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Elsharkawy A, Hernesniemi J. Not all roads lead to Rome…. World Neurosurg. 2013;80(6):806–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wiebers DO, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362(9378):103–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weir B. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a review. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(1):3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ji T, et al. Current status of the treatment of blood blister-like aneurysms of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery: a review. Int J Med Sci. 2017;14(4):390–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Frösen J, et al. Flow-induced, inflammation-mediated arterial wall remodeling in the formation and progression of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;47(1):E21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Robertson AM, et al. Diversity in the strength and structure of unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng. 2015;43(7):1502–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cebral JR, et al. Regional mapping of flow and wall characteristics of intracranial aneurysms. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44(12):3553–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Walcott BP, et al. Predictive modeling and in vivo assessment of cerebral blood flow in the management of complex cerebral aneurysms. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016;36(6):998–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dmytriw AA, et al. Endosaccular flow disruption: a new frontier in endovascular aneurysm management. Neurosurgery. 2019;86(2):170–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Molyneux AJ, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet. 2005;366(9488):809–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chung J, et al. Microsurgical clipping of unruptured middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms: incidence of and risk factors for procedure-related complications. World Neurosurg. 2015;83(5):666–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dmytriw AA, et al. Endosaccular flow disruption: a new frontier in endovascular aneurysm management. Neurosurgery. 2020;86(2):170–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Klisch J, et al. The woven EndoBridge cerebral aneurysm embolization device (WEB II): initial clinical experience. Neuroradiology. 2011;53(8):599–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zanaty M, et al. Off-label use of the WEB device. World Neurosurg. 2020;134:e1047–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fiorella D, et al. Interobserver variability in the assessment of aneurysm occlusion with the WEB aneurysm embolization system. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(8):591–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pierot L, et al. Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB: results of the WEBCAST study. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(5):1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lv X, Zhang Y, Jiang W. Systematic review of woven EndoBridge for wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: complications, adequate occlusion rate, morbidity, and mortality. World Neurosurg. 2018;110:20–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pierot L, et al. Aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of two prospective, multicenter series: 3-year follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg. 2021;13(4):363–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fiorella D, et al. Demographic, procedural and 30-day safety results from the WEB Intra-saccular Therapy Study (WEB-IT). J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(12):1191–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. van Rooij SBT, et al. The new low-profile WEB 17 system for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: first clinical experiences. Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(5):859–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bhogal P, et al. The Medina embolic device: Karolinska experience. Interv Neuroradiol. 2018;24(1):4–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sourour NA, et al. Medina® embolization device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: safety and angiographic effectiveness at 6 months. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(2):155–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aguilar Perez M, et al. The Medina embolic device: early clinical experience from a single center. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(1):77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Piotin M, et al. The LUNA aneurysm embolization system for intracranial aneurysm treatment: short-term, mid-term and long-term clinical and angiographic results. J NeuroInterv Surg. 2018;10(12):e34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kraitem A, et al. O-028 the intrasaccular seal© device: improved flexibility and healing. J NeuroInterv Surg. 2020;12(Suppl 1):A20.

    Google Scholar 

  33. van Rooij WJ, et al. WEB treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(9):1679–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Asnafi S, et al. Efficacy and safety of the woven EndoBridge (WEB) device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(12):2287–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amer Alshekhlee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ilorah, C., Ezepue, C., Alshekhlee, A. (2022). Future of Aneurysm Surgery: Flow Disruption. In: Edgell, R.C., M. Christopher, K. (eds) Neurointervention in the Medical Specialties. Current Clinical Neurology. Humana, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87428-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87428-5_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-87427-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-87428-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics