Abstract
The rapid development of digitalization has led to a more or less endless variety of ways for individuals to communicate and interact with the outside world. However, in order to take advantage of all the benefits of digitalization, individuals need to have the necessary skills. Seniors represent a group that, compared to other groups, lives in a digital exclusion to an excessive extent, mainly due to the fact that they lack the necessary knowledge to use digital technology and digital services. Based on empirical data collected from seniors partaking in digital training, we have analyzed their perceptions of why they and other seniors are digitally excluded. Our findings point out that a major barrier for seniors to be more digitally included is different variants of fear of using digital technology and digital services. The common denominator can be traced down the possibilities to be exposed to frauds, scams, viruses, and faulty handling, which in turn cause undesired consequences. Consequently, we propose a research agenda where digital training and digital inclusion measurements should be studied side by side with cybersecurity behavior. Thus, making cybersecurity a fundamental part of digital inclusion has the potential to minimize the fears identified in this research as inhibitors to technology adoption.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development : https://www.oecd.org/.
- 2.
Telia Sweden AB is Sweden’s largest telecom operator. Telia Sweden AB sells connections in fixed telephony, data communications, Internet, digital TV, IP telephony, and mobile telephony to private individuals, companies and organizations.
References
Al-Alosi, H.: Cyber-violence: digital abuse in the context of domestic violence. UNSWLJ 40, 1573 (2017)
Bada, M., Sasse, A.M., Nurse, J.R.: Cyber security awareness campaigns: Why do they fail to change behaviour? arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.02672 (2019)
Bagga, T., Sodhi, J., Shukla, B., Qazi, M.: Smartphone security behaviour of the Indian smartphone user. Man In India 97(24), 333–344 (2017)
Berelson, B.: Content Analysis in Communication Research. Content Analysis in Communication Research, Free Press, New York (1952)
Bélanger, F., Carter, L.: Trust and risk in e-government adoption. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 17(2), 165–176 (2008)., https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VG3-4RN4892-1/2/af26a5d6a3b53b9cf437a405625045d4, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002
van Deursen, A., Helsper, E.: A nuanced understanding of internet use and non-use among the elderly. Eur. J. Commun. 30(2), 171–187 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115578059
van Dijk, J.: Digital divide research, achievements and shortcomings. Poetics 34(4), 221–235 (2006)
Ebbers, W.E., Jansen, M.G.M., van Deursen, A.J.A.M.: Impact of the digital divide on e-government: Expanding from channel choice to channel usage. Gov. Inf. Q. 33(4), 685–692 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.007, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X16301460
Fortes, R.P.M., Martins, G.A., Castro, P.C.: A review of senescent’s motivation in the use of tactile devices. Procedia Comput. Sci. 67, 376–387 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.282, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050915031282
The Sweden Internet Foundation: The swedes and the internet. Report (2019). www.svenskarnaochinternet
Hill, R., Betts, L.R., Gardner, S.E.: Older adults’ experiences and perceptions of digital technology: (dis) empowerment, wellbeing, and inclusion. Comput. Hum. Behav. 48, 415–423 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.062, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563215000904
Holgersson, J., Söderström, E.: Bridging the gap: Exploring elderly citizens’ perceptions of digital exclusion. In: 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden, June 8–14, 2019. Association for Information Systems (2019)
Jarke, J.: Co-creating Digital Public Services for an Ageing Society. PAIT, vol. 6. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52873-7
Krippendorff, K.: Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Commun. Res. 30(3), 411–433 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00738.x
Kumar, S., Ureel, L.C., King, H., Wallace, C.: Lessons from our elders: identifying obstacles to digital literacy through direct engagement. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, pp. 1–8 (2013)
Ndibwile, J.D., Luhanga, E.T., Fall, D., Kadobayashi, Y.: A demographic perspective of smartphone security and its redesigned notifications. J. Inf. Process. 27, 773–786 (2019)
Niehaves, B., Plattfaut, R.: Internet adoption by the elderly: employing is technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 23(6), 708–726 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.19
Nishijima, M., Ivanauskas, T.M., Sarti, F.M.: Evolution and determinants of digital divide in brazil (2005–2013). Telecommun. Policy 41(1), 12–24 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2016.10.004, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596116301835
OECD: Going digital in sweden - oecd reviews of digital transformation. Report (2018). https://www.oecd.org/sweden/going-digital-in-sweden.pdf
Pattinson, M., Butavicius, M., Parsons, K., McCormac, A., Calic, D.: Factors that influence information security behavior: an Australian web-based study. In: Tryfonas, T., Askoxylakis, I. (eds.) HAS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9190, pp. 231–241. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20376-8_21
Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. Sage, London (2002)
Polat, R.K.: Digital exclusion in turkey: a policy perspective. Gov. Inf. Q. 29(4), 589–596 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.03.002, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X12000950
Rhee, H.S., Kim, C., Ryu, Y.U.: Self-efficacy in information security: its influence on end users’ information security practice behavior. Comput. Secur. 28(8), 816–826 (2009)
Rose, J., Holgersson, J., Söderström, E.: Digital inclusion competences for senior citizens: the survival basics. In: Viale Pereira, G., et al. (eds.) EGOV 2020. LNCS, vol. 12219, pp. 151–163. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57599-1_12
Silverman, D.: Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction, vol. 2nd edn. Sage, London (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Holgersson, J., Kävrestad, J., Nohlberg, M. (2021). Cybersecurity and Digital Exclusion of Seniors: What Do They Fear?. In: Furnell, S., Clarke, N. (eds) Human Aspects of Information Security and Assurance. HAISA 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 613. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81111-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81111-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81110-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81111-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)