Abstract
This chapter considers the ways in which the concept of ‘the weird’ has been appropriated by scholars of the nonhuman turn to formulate an attitude to the Anthropocene, and how that scholarship has informed the writing and analysis of weird writing in return. It questions the nonhumanist approach to the weird, particularly the general consensus that venturing beyond human cognition and experientiality is not only possible, but the only ethically righteous choice. In response to the nonhumanist revulsion of anthropocentrism, it argues that to not consider weird fiction as centrally concerned with very human responses and impulses towards the nonhuman other is to do its complexity a disservice. An analysis of Algernon Blackwood’s “The Willows” and Jeff VanderMeer’s Annihilation shows that the problem underlying both weird writing and nonhuman theory is by necessity anthropocentric conflict between human subject and world. In nonhumanist frameworks the weird’s complex literary engagement with this problem is too often simplified to facilitate fantasies of access and participation in the world as well as to envision that world’s quasi-occult mystique. This chapter traces the pervasive animistic and enchanting tendencies at work in both weird fiction and nonhumanist theory and maintains that while the former frustrates and problematises those tendencies, the latter tends to leave them unacknowledged.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, M.H. 1971. Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Romantic Literature. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bennett, Jane. 2001. The Enchantment of Modern Life: Attachments, Crossings, and Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Blasdel, Alex. 2017. “A reckoning for our species’: the philosopher prophet of the Anthropocene.” The Guardian, June 15, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/15/timothy-morton-anthropocene-philosopher.
Blackwood, Algernon. (1907) 2011. “The Willows.” Blackwood Stories. http://algernonblackwood.org/Z-files/Willows.pdf.
Boysen, Benjamin. 2018. “The Embarrassment of Being Human: A Critique of New Materialism and Object-Oriented Ontology.” Orbis Literarum 73: 225–242.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cole, Andrew. 2013. “The Call of Things: A Critique of Object-Oriented Ontologies.” Minnesota Review 80: 106–118.
Owen, Alex. 2004. The Place of Enchantment: British Occultism and the Culture of the Modern. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Harman, Graham. 2005. Guerilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. Illinois: Open Court Publishing.
Harman, Graham. 2010. Circus Philosophicus. Hants: Zero Books.
Harman, Graham. 2011. Weird Realism: Lovecraft and Philosophy. Hants: Zero Books.
Morton, Timothy. 2016a. Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence. West Sussex: Columbia University Press.
Morton, Timothy. 2016b. “Weird Embodiment.” In Sentient Performativities of Embodiment: Thinking alongside the Human, edited by Lynette Hunter, Elisabeth Krimmer, and Peter Lichtenfels, 19–33. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Rekret, Paul. 2016. “A Critique of New Materialism: Ethics and Ontology.” Subjectivity 9: 225–245.
Robertson, Benjamin. 2018. None of This Is Normal: The Fiction of Jeff VanderMeer. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Sonic Acts. 2017. “Jeff VanderMeer: AREA X: The Fictive Imagination in the Dusk of the Anthropocene”. Filmed February 2015. YouTube video, 28:13. https://youtu.be/uJ6aUBLL8z4.
Sullivan, Jack. 1978. Elegant Nightmares. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
Tabas, Brad. 2015. “Dark Places: Ecology, Place, and the Metaphysics of Horror Fiction.” Miranda (11): n.p.
VanderMeer, Jeff. 2014. Annihilation. London: Fourth Estate.
VanderMeer, Jeff. 2015. Acceptance. London: Fourth Estate.
Wilk, Elvia. 2018. “The World Made Fresh: Mystical Encounter and the New Weird Divine.” E-flux (92): n.p. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/92/205298/the-word-made-fresh-mystical-encounter-and-the-new-weird-divine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Faassen, K. (2021). Cthulhu Calling: Weird Intimacy and Estrangement in the Anthropocene. In: Liebermann, Y., Rahn, J., Burger, B. (eds) Nonhuman Agencies in the Twenty-First-Century Anglophone Novel . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79442-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79442-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79441-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79442-2
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)