Skip to main content

ESD: Indications, Techniques, and Results

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovative Endoscopic and Surgical Technology in the GI Tract

Abstract

Superficial cancers with negligible risk for lymph node metastasis can be cured by endoscopic local resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is a conventional technique that can resect relatively small lesions by using a snare. In contrast, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can resect superficial lesions in an en bloc fashion irrespective of size or the presence of submucosal fibrosis, which has expanded the indication for endoscopic resection. Although endoscopic skill and sufficient knowledge of possible complications are required, ESD is a promising technique for organ preserving minimally invasive treatment due to its excellent clinical outcome and getting popular around the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ishihara R, Arima M, Iizuka T, Oyama T, Katada C, Kato M, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines for esophageal cancer. Dig Endosc. 2020;32(4):452–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Draganov PV, Wang AY, Othman MO, Fukami N. AGA Institute Clinical Practice Update: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(1):16–25. e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T, Repici A, Vieth M, De Ceglie A, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015;47(9):829–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gotoda T, Yanagisawa A, Sasako M, Ono H, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T, et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer. 2000;3(4):219–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hirasawa T, Gotoda T, Miyata S, Kato Y, Shimoda T, Taniguchi H, et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis and the feasibility of endoscopic resection for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12(3):148–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hatta W, Gotoda T, Oyama T, Kawata N, Takahashi A, Yoshifuku Y, et al. A scoring system to stratify curability after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: "eCura system". Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112(6):874–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tanaka S, Kashida H, Saito Y, Yahagi N, Yamano H, Saito S, et al. Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection. Dig Endosc. 2019;32(2):219–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yahagi N, Kato M, Ocihai Y, Maehata T, Sasaki M, Kiguchi Y, et al. Outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial duodenal epithelial neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;88(4):676–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kashimura K, Mizushima Y, Oka M, Enomoto S, et al. Comparison of various submucosal injection solutions for maintaining mucosal elevation during endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy. 2004;36(7):579–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu W, Wang M, Zhao L, Wang M, Wang X, Fan Z, et al. Thermo-sensitive isopentane aerification for mucosal lift during endoscopic resection in animal models (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86(6):1168–75 e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Uemura N, Oda I, Saito Y, Ono H, Fujisaki J, Matsuhashi N, et al. Efficacy and safety of 0.6% sodium alginate solution in endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal and gastric neoplastic lesion: a randomized controlled study. Dig Endosc. 2019;31(4):396–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miura Y, Shinozaki S, Hayashi Y, Sakamoto H, Lefor AK, Yamamoto H. Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection is feasible using the pocket-creation method. Endoscopy. 2017;49(1):8–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yahagi N, Nishizawa T, Sasaki M, Ochiai Y, Uraoka T. Water pressure method for duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy. 2017;49(10):E227–E8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kato M, Takatori Y, Sasaki M, Mizutani M, Tsutsumi K, Kiguchi Y, et al. Water pressure method for duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;93(4):942–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshida M, Takizawa K, Nonaka S, Shichijo S, Suzuki S, Sato C, et al. Conventional versus traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for large esophageal cancers: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(1):55–65 e2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshida M, Takizawa K, Suzuki S, Koike Y, Nonaka S, Yamasaki Y, et al. Conventional versus traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasms: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(5):1231–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamasaki Y, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, Kanesaka T, Kato M, Hamada K, et al. Efficacy of traction-assisted colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using a clip-and-thread technique: a prospective randomized study. Dig Endosc. 2018;30(4):467–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maehata T, Fujimoto A, Uraoka T, Kato M, Horii J, Sasaki M, et al. Efficacy of a new image-enhancement technique for achieving hemostasis in endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92(3):667–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kato M, Ochiai Y, Fukuhara S, Maehata T, Sasaki M, Kiguchi Y, et al. Clinical impact of closure of the mucosal defect after duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;89(1):87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsutsumi K, Kato M, Kakushima N, Iguchi M, Yamamoto Y, Kanetaka K, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic preventive procedures to reduce delayed adverse events after endoscopic resection of superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: a meta-analysis of observational comparative trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pohl H, Grimm IS, Moyer MT, Hasan MK, Pleskow D, Elmunzer BJ, et al. Clip closure prevents bleeding after endoscopic resection of large colon polyps in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2019;157(4):977–84.e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yahagi N, Nishizawa T, Akimoto T, Ochiai Y, Goto O. New endoscopic suturing method: string clip suturing method. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84(6):1064–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kantsevoy SV, Bitner M, Mitrakov AA, Thuluvath PJ. Endoscopic suturing closure of large mucosal defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection is technically feasible, fast, and eliminates the need for hospitalization (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(3):503–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Goto O, Oyama T, Ono H, Takahashi A, Fujishiro M, Saito Y, et al. Endoscopic hand-suturing is feasible, safe, and may reduce bleeding risk after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter pilot study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(5):1195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hanaoka N, Ishihara R, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, Higashino K, Ohta T, et al. Intralesional steroid injection to prevent stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal cancer: a controlled prospective study. Endoscopy. 2012;44(11):1007–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yamashina T, Uedo N, Fujii M, Ishihara R, Mikamori M, Motoori M, et al. Delayed perforation after intralesional triamcinolone injection for esophageal stricture following endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy. 2013;45 Suppl 2 UCTN:E92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsujii Y, Hayashi Y, Kawai N, Yamada T, Yamamoto K, Hayashi S, et al. Risk of perforation in balloon dilation associated with steroid injection for preventing esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5(7):E573–E9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ishida T, Morita Y, Hoshi N, Yoshizaki T, Ohara Y, Kawara F, et al. Disseminated nocardiosis during systemic steroid therapy for the prevention of esophageal stricture after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc. 2015;27(3):388–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kato M, Nishida T, Yamamoto K, Hayashi S, Kitamura S, Yabuta T, et al. Scheduled endoscopic surveillance controls secondary cancer after curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer: a multicentre retrospective cohort study by Osaka University ESD study group. Gut. 2013;62(10):1425–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsujii Y, Nishida T, Nishiyama O, Yamamoto K, Kawai N, Yamaguchi S, et al. Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplasms: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Endoscopy. 2015;47(9):775–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y, Hotta K, Sakamoto N, Ikematsu H, et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72(6):1217–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Probst A, Ebigbo A, Markl B, Schaller T, Anthuber M, Fleischmann C, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early rectal neoplasia: experience from a European center. Endoscopy. 2017;49(3):222–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ge PS, Thompson CC, Aihara H. Development and clinical outcomes of an endoscopic submucosal dissection fellowship program: early United States experience. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(2):829–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Suzuki H, Takizawa K, Hirasawa T, Takeuchi Y, Ishido K, Hoteya S, et al. Short-term outcomes of multicenter prospective cohort study of gastric endoscopic resection: 'Real-world evidence' in Japan. Dig Endosc. 2019;31(1):30–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hoteya S, Furuhata T, Takahito T, Fukuma Y, Suzuki Y, Kikuchi D, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumor. Digestion. 2017;95(1):36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yamada M, Saito Y, Takamaru H, Sasaki H, Yokota T, Matsuyama Y, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms in 423 cases: a retrospective study. Endoscopy. 2017;49(3):233–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naohisa Yahagi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kato, M., Yahagi, N. (2021). ESD: Indications, Techniques, and Results. In: Horgan, S., Fuchs, KH. (eds) Innovative Endoscopic and Surgical Technology in the GI Tract . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78217-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78217-7_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78216-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78217-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics