Skip to main content

Gustatory and Olfactory Rhetorics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sensory Modes of Animal Rhetorics

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature ((PSAAL))

  • 287 Accesses

Abstract

Equally ignored in most literature on communication are the gustatory and olfactory rhetorics that we employ on a daily basis. Yet these signals help regulate our appetite, our sense of home and place, and even our openness to sexual intercourse. From an evolutionary standpoint, they are senses that greatly contribute to our ability to cooperate and carry on our genes to the next generation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdul-Raof, Hussein. Arabic Rhetoric: A Pragmatic Analysis. Routledge, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, Diane. A Natural History of the Senses. Vntage Books, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, David. 1982. “The Influence of Androstenol—A Putative Human Pheromone—On Mood Throughout the Menstrual Cycle.” Biological Psychology 15, nos. 3–4: 249–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, David, and Vivien Wastell. 1986. “Effects of Androstenol on Human Sexual Arousal.” Biological Psychology 22, no. 2: 141–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branch, Erin L. 2015. “‘Taste Analytically’: Julia Child’s Rhetoric of Cultivation.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 45, no. 2: 164–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullfinch, Thomas. 2003. Bullfinch’s Mythology. New York: Gramercy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charpentier, Marie J. E., SylvÈRe Mboumba, Claude Ditsoga, and Christine M. Drea. “Nasopalatine Ducts and Flehmen Behavior in the Mandrill: Reevaluating Olfactory Communication in Old World Primates.” American Journal of Primatology 75, no. 7 (2013): 703–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Denise, and Jeannette Haviland-Jones. “Human Olfactory Communication of Emotion.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 91, no. 3 (December 1, 2000): 771–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMello, Margo. Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animal Studies. Columbia University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolph, Phil. “Taste and ‘the Philosophy of Rhetoric’.” Western Speech 32, no. 2 (Spring1968): 104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, Richard L. 1981. “Olfactory Communication in Humans.” Chemical Senses 6, no. 4: 351–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doty, Richard L., Steven Applebaum, Hiroyuki Zusho, and R. Gregg Settle. “Sex Differences in Odor Identification Ability: A Cross-Cultural Analysis.” Neuropsychologia 23, no. 5 (January 1, 1985): 667–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doucet, Sébastien, Robert Soussignan, Paul Sagot, and Benoist Schaal. 2007. “The ‘Smellscape’ of Mother’s Breast: Effects of Odor Masking and Selective Unmasking on Neonatal Arousal, Oral, and Visual Responses.” Developmental Psychobiology 49, no. 2: 129–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, Karl von. “Decoding the Language of the Bee.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. 141–55. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galapagos with David Attenborough. vol. 3. Sky One, 2013. 18:30–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grammer, Karl, Bernhard Fink, and Nick Neave. 2005. “Human Pheromones and Sexual Attraction.” European journal of obstetrics and gynecology and reproductive biology 118, no. 2: 135–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Jody. 2006. “Accounting for Taste.” The Eighteenth Century 47, no. 1: 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Donald R. “Is Man Language?” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. 343–56. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosser, Bernard I, Louis Monti-Bloch, Clive Jennings-White, and David L Berliner. “Behavioral and Electrophysiological Effects of Androstadienone, a Human Pheromone.” Psychoneuroendocrinology 25, no. 3 (2000): 289–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hediger, Heini. “The Animal’s Expression.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. Semiotics, Communication and Cognition, 123–40. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinlein, R. A. Stranger in a Strange Land. Penguin Publishing Group, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone Jr, Henry W. “Rhetoric as a Wedge: A Reformulation.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 20, no. 4 (1990): 333–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestel, Dominique. “The Biosemiotics and Phylogenesis of Culture.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. 377–410. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. Brian, and D. Michael Gower. Biology of Communication. New York: Wiley, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milstein, Tema. 2013. “Banging on the Divide: Cultural Reflection and Refraction at the Zoo.” In Perspectives on Human-Animal Communication: Internatural Communication, edited by Emily Plec, 162–181. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, Hiromi, and Homei Miyashita. “Communication by Change in Taste.” In CHI ‘11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1999–2004. Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Lisa L. “Smellscapes, Social Justice, and Olfactory Perception.” In Rhetoric Across Borders, edited by Anne Teresa Demo. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollan, Michael. In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Manifesto. Penguin Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, João Carlos, Mariana Chaves, Carolina Chaves, Lisete Lemos, Eduardo D. Silva, António Paiva, and Thomas Hummel. “Cross-Cultural Validation of a Taste Test with Paper Strips.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 273, no. 10 (October 1, 2016): 3407–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Michael J. “Human Olfactory Communication.” Nature 260 (1976): 520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffer, Michael B., and Andrea R. Miller. 1999. The Material Life of Human Beings: Artifacts, Behavior, and Communication. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleidt, Margret. “Personal Odor and Nonverbal Communication.” Ethology and Sociobiology 1, no. 3 (September 1, 1980): 225–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. “Barbarians at the Plate: Taming and Feeding the Modern American Family.” Bowker, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Justine Beatrice. “A Taste for Things: Sensory Rhetoric Beyond the Human.” (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Owen M. “Culinary Rhetoric and Rhetorical Cookery: Plato Was Right After All.” (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, Tristram D. “How Animals Communicate Via Pheromones (Cover Story).” American Scientist 103, no. 2 (2015): 114–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex C. Parrish .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parrish, A.C. (2021). Gustatory and Olfactory Rhetorics. In: The Sensory Modes of Animal Rhetorics. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76712-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics