Skip to main content

The Audio-Visual Norm

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sensory Modes of Animal Rhetorics

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature ((PSAAL))

  • 259 Accesses

Abstract

Part II of this book suggests that the way we view our best-known senses can lead us astray for several reasons. Our senses are not always as reliable or powerful as we would like to think. They also present only partial pictures of the world. With regard to the five senses we think we know, the three chapters in this portion of the book will present some surprising information. The first treats the audio/visual bias humans have—most regularly developed individuals of our species rely heavily on these to map, navigate, simulate, and interact with their environments, often to the exclusion of other obvious sources of information. Yet our sight and hearing are fairly weak compared to many animals, and these primary senses are apt to “play tricks” or be processed in misleading fashion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Atkins-Sayre, Wendy. “Articulating Identity: People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and the Animal/Human Divide.” Western Journal of Communication 74, no. 3 (2010): 309–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Dare A. “Infants’ Contribution to the Achievement of Joint Reference.” 1991, 875.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Kenneth. A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corkum, Valerie, and Chris Moore. “Development of Joint Visual Attention in Infants.” In Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development, edited by Chris Moore and Philip J. Dunham. 61–83. New York: Psychology Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, David. Visible Signs (Second Edition): An Introduction to Semiotics in the Visual Arts. Bloomsbury Academic, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, Stéphen, Paul Morissette, and Marcelle Ricard. “Two Perspectives on Pointing in Infancy.” In Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development, edited by Chris Moore and Philip J. Dunham. 85–102. New York: Psychology Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahnestock, Jeanne. “Forming Plants in Words and Images.” Poroi 10, no. 2 (2014): Article 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, Karl von. “Decoding the Language of the Bee.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. 141–55. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawhee, Debra. “Language as Sensuous Action: Sir Richard Paget, Kenneth Burke, and Gesture-Speech Theory.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 92, no. 4 (2006): 331–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Rhetoric’s Sensorium.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 101, no. 1 (January 2, 2015, 2015): 2–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hediger, Heini. “The Animal’s Expression.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. Semiotics, Communication and Cognition, 123–40. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, Poulakos, and Crick Nathan. “There Is Beauty Here, Too: Aristotle’s Rhetoric for Science.” 2012, 295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, George A. Comparative Rhetoric: An Historical and Cross-Cultural Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostelnick, Charles, and Michael Hassett. Shaping Information: The Rhetoric of Visual Conventions. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J. R., and R. Dawkins. “Animal Signals: Mind-Reading and Manipulation.” In Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, edited by J. R. Krebs. 380–402. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, Benjamin P., Eugen Zaretsky, Sascha Schwarz, and Harald A. Euler. “Words Won’t Fail: Experimental Evidence on the Role of Verbal Proficiency in Mate Choice.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology (December 19, 2013, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewiecki-Wilson, Cynthia. “Rethinking Rhetoric Through Mental Disabilities.” [In English]. Rhetoric Review 22, no. 2 (2003): 156–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding: In Four Books. Beecroft, 1775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, A. N., and A. Gopnik. “The Role of Imitation in Understanding Persons and Developing a Theory of Mind.”. In Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Autism edited by S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, and D. J. Cohen. 335–66. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mithen, Steven J. Thoughtful Foragers: A Study of Prehistoric Decision Making. New Studies in Archaeology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberzaucher, Elisabeth. “Sex and Gender Differences in Communication Strategies.” In Evolution’s Empress, Darwinian Perspectives on the Nature of Women, edited by M. Fisher, J. Garcia, and R. Sokol Chang, 345–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Walter J. Fighting for Life: Contest, Sexuality, and Consciousness. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. New Accents. London and New York: Methuen, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owren, Michael, Drew Rendall, and Michael Ryan. “Redefining Animal Signaling: Influence Versus Information in Communication.” Biology & Philosophy 25, no. 5 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, Alex C. Adaptive Rhetoric: Evolution, Culture, and the Art of Persuasion. Routledge Studies in Rhetoric and Communication. New York: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Lisa L. “Smellscapes, Social Justice, and Olfactory Perception”. In Rhetoric Across Borders, edited by Anne Teresa Demo. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plec, Emily. Perspectives on Human-Animal Communication: Internatural Communication. New York: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickert, Thomas J. Ambient Rhetoric: The Attunements of Rhetorical Being. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas. “Prefigurements of Art.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. 195–244. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “‘Talking’ with Animals: Zoosemiotics Explained.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. 87–98. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Talking with Animals: Zoosemiotics Explained.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. 87–98. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharov, Alexei, Timo Maran, and Morten Tønnessen. “Organisms Reshape Sign Relations.” Springer, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, Paul. The Others: How the Animals Made Us Human. Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Carolynn K. lynn L., and Sarah L. Zielinski. “Brainy Bird.” Scientific American 310, no. 2 (2014): 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, Michael. “Joint Attention as Social Cognition.” In Joint Attention: Its Origins and Role in Development, edited by Chris Moore and Philip J. Dunham, 103–30. New York: Psychology Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitanza, Victor J. “Imagine a Re-Thinking of Historiographies (of Rhetorics) as Atemporal, Anachronistic Post-Cinematic Practices.” RSQ: Rhetoric Society Quarterly 44, no. 3 (2014): 271–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, Hal, and Luke Rendell. The Cultural Lives of Whales and Dolphins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex C. Parrish .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parrish, A.C. (2021). The Audio-Visual Norm. In: The Sensory Modes of Animal Rhetorics. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76712-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics