Skip to main content

Rhetoric’s Role in Human Exceptionalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sensory Modes of Animal Rhetorics

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature ((PSAAL))

  • 292 Accesses

Abstract

The final part of the book addresses the dangers of human exceptionalism. In the first chapter of the section, I provide a brief history of rhetorical theory’s role in human exceptionalism, as well as its ties to various periods (treated briefly) in Western philosophy. As we reach past postmodernity to something post-postmodern, some alternatives to idealism will present themselves, which includes the so-called new materialist subdisciplines of rhetoric. Many of these new approaches are anti-hierarchical systems that treat the evolution of language in a continuist frame. Human speech did not crop up de novo, and it has many similarities to other forms of animal communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alger, Janet M., and Steven F. Alger. “Beyond Mead: Symbolic Interaction between Humans and Felines.” Society & Animals 5, no. 1 (1997): 65–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Douglas R. “Peirce’s Horse: A Sympathetic and Semeiotic Bond.” In Animal Pragmatism: Rethinking Human-Nonhuman Relationships, edited by Erin McKenna and Andrew Light. 86–94: Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Scot, and Casey Boyle, eds. Rhetoric, Through Everyday Things, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekoff, Marc, and Colin Allen. “Intentional Communication and Social Play: How and Why Animals Negotiate and Agree to Play.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. 175–93. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birke, Lynda. “Listening to Voices: On the Pleasures and Problems of Studying Human-Animal Relationships.” The Rise of Critical Animal Studies: From the Margins to the Centre (2014): 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, Kenneth. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condit, Celeste M. “Contemporary Rhetorical Criticism: Diverse Bodies Learning New Languages.” 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudworth, Erika. “Beyond Speciesism: Intersectionality, Critical Sociology and the Human Domination of Other Animals.” The Rise of Critical Animal Studies: From the Margins to the Centre (2014): 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, Richard, and J. R. Krebs. “Animal Signals: Information or Manipulation?” In Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, edited by J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies. 282–309. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, Frans. The Ape and the Sushi Master: Cultural Reflections of a Primatologist. Basic Books, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel Clement. The Intentional Stance [in English]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques, and Marie-Louise Mallet. The Animal That Therefore I Am. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewalt, Joshua P. “Points of Difference in the Study of More-Than-Human Rhetorical Ontologies.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 21, no. 3 (2018): 523–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahnestock, Jeanne. “Rhetoric in the Age of Cognitive Science.” In The Viability of the Rhetorical Tradition, edited by Richard Graff, Arthur E. Walzer, Janet M. Atwill, and Steven Mailloux. 159–79. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorgias, and Douglas M. MacDowell. Encomium of Helen. Bristol [Avon]: Bristol Classical Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, Stephen Jay. Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life. 1st ed. New York: Ballantine Pub. Group, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Donald R. “Is Man Language?” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. 343–56. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, David. Empathy: What It Is and Why It Matters. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, Tim. “The Animal in the Study of Humanity.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. 357–76. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, George A. Comparative Rhetoric: An Historical and Cross-Cultural Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, J. R., and R. Dawkins. “Animal Signals: Mind-Reading and Manipulation.” In Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, edited by J. R. Krebs. 380–402. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestel, Dominique. “The Biosemiotics and Phylogenesis of Culture.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. 377–410. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewiecki-Wilson, Cynthia. “Rethinking Rhetoric Through Mental Disabilities.” [In English]. Rhetoric Review 22, no. 2 (2003): 156–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, Stephen J. “Un-Defining Man: The Case for Symbolic Animal Communication.” In Perspectives on Human-Animal Communication: Internatural Communication, edited by Emily Plec. 226–44. New York: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, Arthur O. The Great Chain of Being; a Study of the History of an Idea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marler, Peter. “The Logical Analysis of Animal Communication.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. 253–78. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Christopher Flynn, Rahul Bhui, Peter Bossaerts, Tetsuro Matsuzawa, and Colin Camerer. “Chimpanzee Choice Rates in Competitive Games Match Equilibrium Game Theory Predictions.” Scientific Reports 4 (2014): 5182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, John. Mathematical Ideas in Biology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Desmond. Cat Watching. 1st American ed. New York: Crown Publishers, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Megan K. “Is Human-Animal Interaction (Hai) Linked to Positive Youth Development? Initial Answers.” Applied Developmental Science 18, no. 1 (2014): 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munday, Pat. “Thinking Through Ravens: Human Hunters, Wolf-Birds, and Embodied Communication.” In Perspectives on Human-Animal Communication: Internatural Communication, edited by Emily Plec. 207–25: New York: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrish, Alex C. Adaptive Rhetoric: Evolution, Culture, and the Art of Persuasion. Routledge Studies in Rhetoric and Communication. New York: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peggs, Kay. “From Centre to Margins and Back Again: Critical Animal Studies and the Reflexive Human Self.” (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim, Mary. “Communicating Social Support to Grieving Clients: The Veterinarians’ View.” In Perspectives on Human-Animal Communication: Internatural Communication, edited by Emily Plec. 129-41. New York: Routledge, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Propen, Amy D. “Technologies of Mediation and the Borders and Boundaries of Human-Nonhuman Animal Relationships in Marine Species Advocacy.” In Rhetoric Across Borders, edited by Anne Teresa Demo. Anderson, SC: Parlor Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebeok, Thomas. “Prefigurements of Art.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. 195–244. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seegert, Natasha “Play of Sniffication: Coyotes Sing in the Margins.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 47, no. 2 (2014): 158–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth, Robert M., and Dorothy L. Cheney. “Meaning, Reference, and Intentionality in the Natural Vocalizations of Monkeys.” In Readings in Zoosemiotics, edited by Timo Maran, Dario Martinelli, and Aleksei Turovski. 157–73. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Nik, and Richard Twine. The Rise of Critical Animal Studies: From the Margins to the Centre. Routledge, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, Niko. The Animal in Its World; Explorations of an Ethologist, 1932–1972. London: Allen and Unwin, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Study of Instinct. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westling, Louise Hutchings. The Logos of the Living World: Merleau-Ponty, Animals, and Language. New York: Fordham University Press, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, W. The Whole Creature: Complexity, Biosemiotics and the Evolution of Culture. Lawrence & Wishart, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, Hal, and Luke Rendell. The Cultural Lives of Whales and Dolphins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiten, A., J. Goodall, W. C. McGrew, T. Nishida, V. Reynolds, Y. Sugiyama, C. E. G. Tutin, R. W. Wrangham, and C. Boesch. “Cultures in Chimpanzees.” Nature 399, no. 6737 (1999): 682–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, Amotz, and Avishag Zahavi. The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin’s Puzzle. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex C. Parrish .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parrish, A.C. (2021). Rhetoric’s Role in Human Exceptionalism. In: The Sensory Modes of Animal Rhetorics. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76712-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics