Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Victim and Witness Retraction and Disengagement: A Systematic Review of Contributing Factors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidence-Based Policing and Community Crime Prevention

  • 1056 Accesses

Abstract

What factors contribute to witness retraction, disengagement or withdrawal from the legal processing of cases, thereby bringing a halt to prosecution processes? The review focused mainly on offences of personal and sexual violence against adult victims. Eight electronic databases were searched, locating a total of 3264 potentially relevant records of which 39 studies were retained for review. While there are numerous studies on attrition, the proportion of them concerned with retraction, disengagement or withdrawal was small. Factors associated with retraction and withdrawal in cases of partner violence included where a couple are living together; where despite conflicts, they have apparently reconciled; where the victim wants the partner to be rehabilitated rather than punished; where the abuser agrees to have counselling or other help; and where the victim engages in self-blame or feels ashamed. Factors associated with cases of rape and sexual assault included victims fearing that their accounts will not be believed and of being cross-examined in court, especially when that can be done by the defendant. Women are more likely to disengage from rape cases if they are more highly distressed, engage in self-blame, have become pregnant or have been hospitalized. Crime investigations that include taking photographs, gathering forensic evidence, video-recorded statements, victim impact statements and where victims are quickly put in contact with support services are more likely to be followed to prosecution. Participation is sustained where victims have found the initial police contact more helpful, which can be influenced by training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Angiolini, E. (2015). Report of the independent review into the investigation and prosecution of rape in London. Crown Prosecution Service. https://www.cps.gov.uk/Publications/equality/vaw/dame_elish_angiolini_rape_review_2015.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Apsler, R., Cummins, M. R., & Carl, S. (2003). Fear and expectations: Differences among female victims of domestic violence who come to the attention of the police. Violence and Victims, 17, 445–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ask, K. (2010). A survey of police officers’ and prosecutors’ beliefs about crime victim behaviors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 1132–1149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, M. (2010). Understanding attrition in domestic violence cases. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 5, 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow-Grint, K. (2016). Attrition rates in domestic abuse: Time for a change? An application of temporal sequencing theory. Policing, 10(3), 250–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beichner, D., & Spohn, C. (2005). Prosecutorial charging decisions in sexual assault cases: Examining the impact of a Specialized Prosecution Unit. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 16, 461–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, J., Graham, D. L. R., Hartman, J., Lippen, V., Allen, G., & Sutherland, J. (2000). Factors related to domestic court dispositions in a large urban area: The role of victim/witness reluctance and other variables, executive summary. US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, C. L., Acierno, R. E., & Resnick, H. S. (2006). A multimedia program to improve criminal justice system participation and reduce distress among physical injured crime victims. Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, R., & Leclerc, C. (2016). Domestic violence reported to the police: Correlates of victims’ reporting behaviour and support to legal proceedings. Violence and Victims, 31, 402–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonomi, A. E., Gangamma, R., Locke, C. R., Katafiasz, H., & Martin, D. (2011). “Meet me at the hill where we used to park”: Interpersonal processes associated with victim recantation. Social Science & Medicine, 73, 1054–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (2011). We mind and we care but have things changed? Assessment of progress in the reporting, investigating and prosecution of allegations of rape. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17, 263–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, J., Hopkins, M., Hubbard, R., Robinson, A., Speed, M., & Tilley, N. (2005). Understanding the attrition process in volume crime investigations. Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cala, M. J., Trigo, M. E., & Saavedra, F. J. (2016). Women’s disengagement from legal proceedings for intimate partner violence: Sociodemographic and psychological variables. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvette, E., Corral, S., & Estévez, A. (2007). Cognitive and coping mechanisms in the interplay between intimate partner violence and depression. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 20, 369–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camacho, C. M., & Alarid, L. F. (2008). The significance of the victim advocate for domestic violence victims in municipal court. Violence and Victims, 23, 288–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., Bybee, D., Kelley, K. D., Dworkin, E. R., & Patterson, D. (2012). The impact of sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) program services on law enforcement investigational practices: A mediational analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., Patterson, D., & Bybee, D. (2012). Sexual assault cases: A longitudinal analysis of the impact of a sexual assault nurse examiner program. Violence Against Women, 18, 223–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chivers, B., & Barnes, G. (2018). Sorry, wrong number: Tracking court attendance targeting through testing a “nudge” text. Cambridge Journal of Evidence Based Policing, 2, 4–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crown Prosecution Service. (2013). Violence against women and girls. Public Accountability and Inclusion Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crown Prosecution Service (2014). The Prosecution of Domestic Violence Cases. London: Crown Prosecution Service. DVConsultation2014@cps.gsi.gov.uk

  • Cumberbatch, J. R., & Barnes, G. C. (2018). This nudge was not enough: A randomised trial of text message reminders of court dates to victims and witnesses. Cambridge Journal of Evidence Based Policing, 2, 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K., & Bouhours, B. (2010). Rape and attrition in the legal process: A comparative analysis of five countries. Crime and Justice, 39, 565–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. C., O’Sullivan, C. S., Farole, D. J., & Rempel, M. (2008). A comparison of two prosecution policies in cases of intimate partner violence: Mandatory case filing versus following the victim’s lead. Criminology and Public Policy, 7, 633–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M., & Dinovitzer, R. (2001). Victim cooperation and the prosecution of domestic violence in a specialized court. Justice Quarterly, 18, 593–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dedel, K. (2006). Witness Intimidation. Problem-Oriented Guides for Police, Problem-Specific Guides Series No. 42. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Mont, J., & Myhr, T. L. (2000). So few convictions: The role of client-related characteristics in the legal processing of sexual assaults. Violence Against Women, 6, 1109–1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, M. A., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Jouriles, E., McDonald, R., Krishnan, S., McFarlane, J., & Sullivan, C. (2003). Recruitment and retention in intimate partner violence research. National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, L. (2003). Responding to victim withdrawal in domestic violence prosecutions. Criminal Law Review, 760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsberg, M., Winkvist, A., Peña, R., & Stenlund, H. (2001). Women’s strategic responses to violence in Nicaragua. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, 547–555.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Enander, V. (2010). “A fool to keep staying”: Battered women labelling themselves stupid as an expression of gendered shame. Violence Against Women, 16, 5–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feist, A., Ashe, J., Lawrence, J., McPhee, D., & Wilson, R. (2007). Investigating and detecting recorded offences of rape. Home Office online report 18/07. London: Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, J. (2006). The attrition of sexual offences from the New South Wales criminal justice system. Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice, Number 92. Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury-Steiner, R. E., Bybee, D., Sullivan, C. M., Belknap, J., & Melton, H. C. (2006). Contextual factors impacting battered women’s intentions to reuse the criminal legal system. Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. A. (2003). Coercing victim participation in domestic violence prosecutions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18, 669–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fugate, M., George, C., Haber, N., & Stawiski, S. (2006). Providing a system of single point access to domestic violence information, resources and referrals to a diverse population: An evaluation of the City of Chicago Domestic Violence Help Line. National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganapathy, N. (2006). Between the devil and the deep-blue sea: Conceptualising victims’ experiences of policing in domestic violence in the Singaporean context. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 39, 90–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, S. (2010). The perceptions of judicial and psychosocial interveners of the consequences of dropped charges in domestic violence cases. Violence Against Women, 16, 1375–1395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, N., Eden, K. B., Bloom, T., & Perrin, N. (2010). Computerized aid improves safety decision process for survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 1947–1964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2007). The use and abuse of special measures: Giving victims the choice? Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 8, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. (2015). Inside the nudge unit: How small changes can make a big difference. W. H. Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, N. B., Hansen, M., Nielsen, L. H., Bramsen, R. H., Elklit, A., & Campbell, R. (2018). Rape crimes: Are victims’ acute psychological distress and perceived social support associated with police case decision and victim willingness to participate in the investigation? Violence Against Women, 24(6), 684–696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, N. B., Nielsen, L. H., Bramsen, R. H., Ingemann-Hansen, O., & Elklit, A. (2015). Attrition in Danish rape reported crimes. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30, 221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, S. C. (2006). What do battered women want? Victims' opinions on prosecution. Violence and Victims, 21, 611–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, S. C. (2010). Intimate partner violence: Victims’ opinions about going to trial. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 765–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, M. (2005). Making it through the criminal justice system: Attrition and domestic violence. Social Policy and Society, 5, 79–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschel, D., & Hutchison, I. W. (2003). The voices of domestic violence victims: Predictors of victim preference for arrest and the relationship between preference for arrest and revictimization. Crime & Delinquency, 49, 313–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohl, K., & Stanko, E. A. (2015). Complaints of rape and the criminal justice system: Fresh evidence on the attrition problem in England and Wales. European Journal of Criminology, 12, 324–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holleran, D., Beichner, D., & Spohn, C. (2010). Examining charging agreement between police and prosecutors in rape cases. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 385–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg, U. (2004). Crime victims’ experiences of police interviews and their inclination to provide or omit information. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 6, 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, C. (1998). Negotiating domestic violence: Police, criminal justice and victims. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, C., & Sanders, A. (2000). Police response to domestic violence: From victim choice to victim empowerment? British Journal of Criminology, 40, 14–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, K. M., Litwack, S. D., Pineles, S. L., Suvak, M. K., Vaughn, R. A., & Resick, P. A. (2013). Predictors of intimate partner violence revictimization: The relative impact of distinct PTSD symptoms, dissociation, and coping strategies. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 26, 102–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. (2011). Here we go round the review-go-round: Rape investigation and prosecution – Are things getting worse not better? Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17, 234–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keilty, J., & Connelly, G. (2001). Making a statement: An exploratory study of barriers facing women with an intellectual disability when making a statement about sexual assault to police. Disability and Society, 16, 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, K. D., & Campbell, R. (2013). Moving on or dropping out: Police processing of adult sexual assault cases. Women & Criminal Justice, 23, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L., Lovett, J., & Regan, L. (2005). A gap or a chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases. In Home Office research study 293. Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsnorth, R. F., & Macintosh, R. C. (2004). Domestic violence: Predictors of victim support for official action. Justice Quarterly, 21, 301–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P. (2006). Restoring rape survivors: Justice, advocacy, and a call to action. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087, 206–234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuennen, T. L. (2007). Analyzing the impact of coercion on domestic violence victims: How much is too much? Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, 22, 2–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landenburger, K. (1989). A process of entrapment in and recovery from an abusive relationship. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 10, 209–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, S. J., Callaghan, L., Grafton, I., Falcone, M. A., & Shaw, S. (2016). Attrition and rape case characteristics: A profile and comparison of female sex workers and non-sex workers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 2175–2195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, S. J., Lanvers, U., & Shaw, S. (2003). Attrition in rape cases: Developing a profile and identifying relevant factors. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 583–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. (2004). Making justice work: Effective legal interventions for domestic violence. British Journal of Criminology, 44, 204–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievore, D. (2003). Non-reporting and hidden recording of sexual assault: An international literature review. Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, J., & Kelly, L. (2009). Different systems, similar outcomes? Tracking attrition in reported rape cases across Europe. Child & Woman Abuse Studies Unit, London Metropolitan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, L., Lee, D., & Barker, C. (2011). Police empathy and victim PTSD as potential factors in rape case attrition. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 26, 112–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, L., Lee, D., & Barker, C. (2012). The impact of psychological consequences of rape on rape case attrition: The police perspective. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27, 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malloy, L. C., & Lamb, M. E. (2010). Biases in judging victims and suspects whose statements are inconsistent. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 46–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matthieu, M., & Ivanoff, A. (2006). Treatment of human-caused trauma: Attrition in the adult outcomes research. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 1654–1664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mele, M., Roberts, C. J., & Wolfer, L. &. (2011). Characteristics of women who withdraw from the protection order process and their decisions for withdrawal. Journal of Current Issues in Crime, Law and Law Enforcement, 3, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, S. (2014). Victims’ experiences of short- and long-term safety and wellbeing: Findings from an examination of an integrated response to domestic violence. Trends & Issues, No. 478. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice, Home Office & Office for National Statistics. (2013). An overview of sexual offending in England and Wales. In Statistical Bulletin. Office for National Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnington-Taylor, E., Bowers, K., Hurle, P. S., Ward, L., Ruda, S., Sweeney, M., Murray, A., & Whitehouse, J. (2019). Testimony at court: A randomised controlled trial investigating the art and science of persuading witnesses and victims to attend trial. Crime Science, 8, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-019-0104-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, V. E., & Kelly, L. (2009). A vicious cycle? Attrition and conviction patterns in contemporary rape cases in England and Wales. In M. Horvath & J. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 281–300). Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S. B., Edwards, K. M., Bennett, S., Bibeau, S. J., & Sichelsteil, J. (2014). Police reporting practices for sexual assault cases in which “the victim does not which to pursue charges”. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 144–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neal, E. N., & Spohn, C. (2016). When the perpetrator is a partner: Arrest and charging decisions in intimate partner sexual assault cases – A focal concerns analysis. Violence Against Women. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801216650289

  • Office for National Statistics. (2018). Sexual offending: Victimization and the path through the criminal justice system. Office for National Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for National Statistics. (2020). Crime in England and Wales: Year ending June 2020. Office for National Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattavina, A., Morabito, M., & Williams, L. M. (2016). Examining connections between the police and prosecution in sexual assault case processing: Does the use of exceptional clearance facilitate a downstream orientation? Victims & Offenders, 11, 315–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, D., & Campbell, R. (2010). Why rape survivors participate in the criminal justice system. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, D., & Tringali, B. (2015). Understanding how advocates can affect sexual assault victim engagement in the criminal justice process. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 1987–1997.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reid-Howie Associates. (2002). Vulnerable and Intimidated Witnesses: Review of provisions in other jurisdictions. Crime and Criminal Justice Research Findings No. 60. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Relyea, M., & Ullman, S. E. (2015). Unsupported or turned against: Understanding how two types of negative social reactions to sexual assault relate to postassault outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 37–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L. (2009). Domestic Abuse, Stalking, and Harassment and Honour Based Violence (DASH, 2009) risk identification and assessment and management model. http://www.dashriskchecklist.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/DASH-2009.pdf

  • Roberts, J. C., Wolfer, L., & Mele, M. (2008). Why victims of intimate partner violence withdraw protection orders. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 369–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. L. (2006). Reducing repeat victimization among high-risk victims of domestic violence: The benefits of a coordinated community response in Cardiff, Wales. Violence Against Women, 12, 761–788.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. L., & Chandek, M. S. (2000). Philosophy into practice? Community policing units and domestic violence victim participation. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 23, 280–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. L., & Cook, D. (2006). Understanding victim retraction in cases of domestic violence: Specialist courts, government policy, and victim-centred justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 9, 189–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabina, C., & Tindale, R. S. (2008). Abuse characteristics and coping resources as predictors of problem-focused coping strategies among battered women. Violence Against Women, 14, 437–456.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, L. F., Emshoff, J. G., Baker, C. K., & Crowley, T. (2007). Examining the behaviour of a system: An outcome evaluation of a coordinated community response to domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 631–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarpa, A., & Haden, S. C. (2006). Community violence victimization and aggressive behavior: The moderating effects of coping and social support. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 502–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoham, E. (2000). The battered wife’s perception of the characteristics of her encounter with the police. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 242–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleath, E. & Smith, L. L. (2017). Understanding the factors that predict victim retraction in police reported allegations of intimate partner violence. Psychology of Violence, 7(1), 140–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2000). It’s my decision, isn’t it? A research note on battered women’s perceptions of mandatory intervention laws. Violence Against Women, 6, 1384–1402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, G. M. (2006). Sexual assault case processing: A descriptive model of attrition and decision making. Alaska Justice Forum, 23, 1 & 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. (2001). Prosecuting sexual assault: A comparison of charging decisions in sexual assault cases involving strangers, acquaintances and intimate partners. Justice Quarterly, 18, 651–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, C., White, C., & Tellis, K. (2014). Unfounding sexual assault: Examining the decision to unfound and identifying false reports. Law & Society Review, 48, 161–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starmer, K. (2011). Domestic violence: The facts, the issues, the future. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 25, 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taft, C. T., Resick, P. E., Panuzio, J., Vogt, D. S., & Mechanic, M. B. (2007a). Examining the correlates of engagement and disengagement coping among help-seeking battered women. Violence and Victims, 22(1), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taft, C. T., Resick, P. E., Panuzio, J., Vogt, D. S., & Mechanic, M. B. (2007b). Coping among victims of relationship abuse: a longitudinal study. Violence and Victims, 22(4), 408–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. C., & Gassner, L. (2010). Stemming the flow: Challenges for policing adult sexual assault with regard to attrition rates and under-reporting of sexual offences. Police Practice and Research, 11, 240–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tellis, K. M., & Spohn, C. C. (2008). The sexual stratification hypothesis revisited: Testing assumptions about simple versus aggravated rape. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 252–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, J., & Krahé, B. (2008). Sexual assault and the justice gap: A question of attitude. Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, D. L., Holroyd, K. A., Reynolds, R. V., & Wigal, J. K. (1989). The hierarchical factor structure of the coping strategies inventory. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 13, 343–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallely, C., Robinson, A., Burton, M., & Tredidga, J. (2005). Evaluation of domestic violence pilot sites at Caerphilly (Gwent) and Croydon 2004/05: Final report. Crown Prosecution Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vásquez, J. J., Rivas, E., Suarez, A. C., & Panadero, S. (2018). Retraction of complaints among female victims of intimate partner violence living in poverty in Nicaragua. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(10), 3151–3167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, A. E., & Resick, P. A. (2004). Coping among adult female victims of domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisz, A. (2002). Prosecution of batterers: Views of African American battered women. Violence and Victims, 17, 19–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westera, N. J., Kebbell, M. R., & Milne, B. (2016). Want a better criminal justice response to rape? Improve police interviews with complainants and suspects. Violence Against Women, 22, 1748–1769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zoellner, L. A., Feeny, N. C., Alvarez, J., Watlington, C., O’Neill, M. L., Zager, R., & Foa, E. B. (2000). Factors associated with completion of the restraining order process in female victims of partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 1081–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK

    James McGuire

  2. Institute for Global Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

    Emily Evans

  3. Centre for Health and Justice, University of Nottingham, Notttingham, UK

    Eddie Kane

Authors
  1. James McGuire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emily Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eddie Kane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McGuire, J., Evans, E., Kane, E. (2021). Victim and Witness Retraction and Disengagement: A Systematic Review of Contributing Factors. In: Evidence-Based Policing and Community Crime Prevention. Advances in Preventing and Treating Violence and Aggression . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76363-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation