Skip to main content

Classes and Dimensions of Task Microprojects: A Case Study on Cargo Handling

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021) (IEA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 219))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1850 Accesses

Abstract

This communication aimed at identifying the different classes of microproject, a specific type of situated design performed by users facing an unpredictable situation of great uncertainty. Our hypothesis is that microprojects work differently, depending on the heterogenous actors and the intermediary objects involved. The research presented three case studies carried out on oil extraction platforms in Brazil, focusing on cargo-handling work. Each case presented unique characteristics, which were analyzed and compared in order to understand the situated design process comprehensively. It was observed that the situated design process has different characteristics depending on the level of interdependence of actors involved in solving the problem. The greater the distance between the realms of the actors involved in the design, the greater the need for formal decision procedures and the use of intermediary objects in situated design. Therefore, design must provide material (equipment, zones, routes) and immaterial (competences, intermediary objects) resources for action and for the situated design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rabardel, P., Béguin, P.: Instrument mediated activity: from subject development to anthropocentric design. Theoret. Issues in Ergon. Sci. 6(5), 429–461 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Béguin, P.: Argumentos para uma abordagem dialógica da inovação, pp. 72–82. Laboreal, IV (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wisner, A.: A inteligência do trabalho: Textos selecionados de ergonomia. Fundacentro, São Paulo (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Béguin, P.: The design of instruments as a dialogical process of mutual learning. In: Falzon, P. (ed.) Constructive Ergonomics. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gotteland-Agostini, C., Pueyo, V., Béguin, P.: Concevoir des cadres pour faire et faire faire: l’activité d’encadrement dans une entreprise horticole. Activités 12(1), 24–45 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Abraçado, M., Duarte, F., Béguin, P., Fontainha, T.: Micro-projets pour des tâches imprévisibles. Actes du 12e Congrès 01. Design. Saint Ferréol (2021, Forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Agre, P., Chapman, D.: What are plans for? Robot. Auton. Syst. 6, 17–34 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schön, D.A.: The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vinck, D., Jeantet, A., Laureillard, P.: Objects and other intermediaries in the sociotechnical process of product design: an explanatory approach. In: Perrin, J., Vinck, D. (eds.) The Role of Design in the Shaping of Technology, pp. 297–320. European Commission Directorate-General Science, Brussels (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boujut, J., Blanco, E.: Intermediary objects as a means to foster co-operation in engineering design. Comput Support Coop. Work 12, 205–219 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yin, R.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, London (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guérin, F., Laville, A., Daniellou, F., Duraffoug, J., Kerguelen, A.: Compreender o trabalho para transformá-lo: a prática da ergonomia. Editora Blucher, São Paulo (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Béguin, P.: Conduite de projet et fabrication collective du travail: une approche développementale. Habilitation a diriger des recherches. Ecole Doctorale: Sciences Sociales. Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2. Bordeaux (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mollo, V., Falzon, P.: Auto- and allo-confrontation as tools for reflective activities. Appl. Ergon. 35(6), 531–540 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bittencourt, J., Duarte, F., Béguin, P.: From the past to the future: integrating work experience into the design process. Work 57, 379–387 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abraçado, M.P., Duarte, F.J.d.C.M., Béguin, P. (2021). Classes and Dimensions of Task Microprojects: A Case Study on Cargo Handling. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 219. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74602-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74602-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74601-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74602-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics