Skip to main content

Dynamic Models of the Firm

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Market Interrelationships and Applied Demand Analysis
  • 282 Accesses

Abstract

Dynamic models of the firm applied to market intermediary behavior are reviewed and formulated. An important input that we have ignored so far is capital. Different models applicable to modeling capital, with special reference to agricultural models, are presented and discussed in this chapter. Both single capital input and multi-variate adjustment cost models are presented. The linkage between quasi-fixed inputs and raw material demand is highlighted. Inventories can be a source of dynamic adjustment of the firm. Dynamic inventory models are formulated to show how lagged inventory adjustment can lead to lagged adjustment in prices and input demands. I discuss some ways in which this model can be modified and extended for other applications. Expectations and lagged inventories through adjustment costs are shown to be significant factors in dynamic adjustment. Different models for expectations formation are presented, and the dynamic inventory model is specified for quasi-rational expectations. Other, mostly empirical approaches to modeling dynamic input demand behavior are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Lucas (1976b) defines the production function with respect to gross investment as opposed to net investment. Subsequent applications are almost exclusively in terms of net investment.

  2. 2.

    To simplify notation, the time dependence of all variables has been suppressed.

  3. 3.

    Factor prices are prices relative to output price.

  4. 4.

    To simplify the notation, the constant \(g_{0}\) has been omitted. It has no consequence for the final equation derived.

  5. 5.

    All the terms in the quadratic function are not included (e.g., squared input prices), because they do not show up in the optimization results.

  6. 6.

    In the general case, where the sum of coefficients on all lagged variables, (\(\sum a_{i} )\), does not sum to one, as in the case of I(1) time series, the sales expectation model can be shown to equal \(E_{t} x_{t + j} = \left( {\sum a_{i} } \right)^{j} x_{t - 1} + \left( {\sum a_{i} } \right)^{j} \varvec{e}_{1}^{\varvec{'}} \varvec{A\iota }\left( {\varvec{I} + \frac{1}{{\sum a_{i} }}\varvec{A} + \frac{1}{{\left( {\sum a_{i} } \right)^{2} }}\varvec{A}^{2} + \ldots \frac{1}{{\left( {\sum a_{i} } \right)^{j} }}\varvec{A}^{j} } \right)\Delta \varvec{X}_{t - 1} =\left( {\sum a_{i} } \right)^{j} x_{t - 1} + \left( {\sum a_{i} } \right)^{j}\varvec{e}_{1}^{\varvec{'}} \varvec{A\iota }\left( {\varvec{I} - \frac{1}{{\sum a_{i} }}\varvec{A}} \right)^{ - 1} \left( {\varvec{I} - \frac{1}{{\left( {\sum a_{i} } \right)^{j} }}\varvec{A}^{j} } \right)\Delta \varvec{X}_{t - 1}\), where \(\Delta \varvec{X}_{t - 1} = \left( {\Delta x_{t - 1,} ,\Delta x_{t - 2,} , \ldots \Delta x_{t - 1 - n,} } \right)^{\varvec{'}}\) as before and \(\varvec{\iota}= \left( {1,1, \ldots ,1} \right)^{\varvec{'}}\). The price expectations model would have a similar form.

  7. 7.

    One might be tempted to replace \(E_{t} q_{t}\) with \(q_{t}\), but this would produce a model with classical errors-in-variables problem. Both Pope and Just (1996) and Moschini (2001) recognize this problem and recommend substituting for market determined relationship as done here.

  8. 8.

    Because this study was conducted before the methodology put forth here, it was based on the same methodology of Lopez (1985) where expectations were assumed to be static. Also, the expected demand function was modeled as a function of the firm’s price, expected industry price, and expected industry demand. Thus, there were two demand shift variables, expected price modeled as lagged price, and expected industry demand modeled as lagged wine shipments for periods t-1 and t-2.

  9. 9.

    See Labys (1973) for an extensive discussion of commodity models with inventory and trade variables.

References

  • Anderson, G., and R. Blundell. “Testing Restrictions in a Flexible Dynamic System: An Application to Consumers’ Expenditures in Canada.” Review of Economic Studies 50(1983): 397–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K., and M. Kurz. Public Investment, the Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bivin, D.G. “Gauging the Performance of the Linear-Quadratic Inventory Model.” Applied Economics 37(2005): 1215–1231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O.J. “The Production and Inventory Behavior of the American Automobile Industry.” Journal of Political Economy 91(1983): 365–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G.E.P., and G.M. Jenkins. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. San Francisco: Holden-Day, Inc., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, G.C. “Rational Versus Adaptive Expectations in Present Value Models.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 71(1989): 376–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichenbaum, M. “Some Empirical Evidence on the Production Level and Production Cost Models of Inventory Investment.” The American Economic Review 79(1989): 853–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, R.M. “Dynamic Coupling with Expecial Reference to Markets having Production Lags.” Econometrica 15(1947): 181–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, C., F. Modigliani, J. Muth, and H. Simon. Planning Production, Inventories, and Work Force. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamien, M.I., and N.L. Schwartz. Dynamic Optimization: The Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control in Economics and Management. New York: Elsevier North Holland, Inc., 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labys, W.C. Dynamic Commodity Models: Specification, Estimation, and Simulation. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Co., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, R. “Supply Response and Investment in the Canadian Food Processing Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67(1985): 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, M.C. “Manufacturers’ Inventories, Sales Expectations, and the Acceleration Principle.” Econometrica 29(1961): 293–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E. “Optimal Investment Policy and the Flexible Accelerator.” International Economic Review 8(1967a): 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R.E. “Adjustment Costs and the Theory of Supply.” Journal of Political Economy 75(1976b): 321–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark, N.C., M. Ogaki, and K. Sul. “Dynamic Seemingly Unrelated Cointegrating Regressions.” Review of Economic Studies 72(2005): 797–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, K.R., and R.J. Cooper. “Intertemporal Duality: Application to Theory of the Firm.” Econometrica 48(1980): 1755–1762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, C.J. “Quasi-fixed Inputs in US and Japanese Manufacturing: A Generalized Leontief Restricted Cost Function Approach.” The Review of Economics & Statistics 70(1988): 275–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison-Paul, C.J. “Market and Cost Structure in the US Beef Packing Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(2001): 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortenson, D.T. “Generalized Adjustment Costs and Dynamic Factor Demand Theory.” Econometrica 41(1973): 657–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moschini, G. “Production Risk and the Estimation of Ex-Ante Cost Functions.” Journal of Econometrics 100(2001): 357–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth, J.F. “Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements.” Econometrica 29(1961): 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadiri, M.I., and S. Rosen. “Interrelated Factor Demand Functions.” American Economic Review 59(1969): 457–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove, M., and D.A. Bessler. “Expectations, Information and Dynamics.” In B.L. Gardner and G.C. Rausser (eds.) Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 1A, pp. 155–206. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., 2001, Chapter 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P.C.B. “Optimal Inference in Cointegrated Systems.” Econometrica 59(1991): 283–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R.S., and J.J. Rotemberg. “Dynamic Factor Demands and the Effect of Energy Price Effects.” The American Economic Review 73(1983): 1066–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, R.D., and R.E. Just. “Empirical Implementation of Ex-Ante Cost Functions. Journal of Econometrics 72(1996): 231–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treadway, A. “The Rational Multivariate Flexible Accelerator.” Econometrica 39(1971): 329–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgenant, Michael K. “Inventory Adjustment and Dynamic Winery Behavior.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64(1982): 222–231. (Erratum: 64(1982): 546.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlgenant, Michael K. “Modeling the Effects of Restricting Packer-Owned Livestock in the U.S. Swine Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92(2010): 654–666.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wohlgenant, M.K. (2021). Dynamic Models of the Firm. In: Market Interrelationships and Applied Demand Analysis. Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy(). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73144-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73144-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73143-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73144-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics