Skip to main content

Dynamics, Risks and Opportunities of Digitalization: An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digitalization of Democratic Processes in Europe

Abstract

Citizens of today’s democracies, especially in the Western world, have more opportunities than ever before to engage in public affairs, as a consequence of the technological developments observed in the last decade in the field of communications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bots in the Twittersphere, retrieved in April (2020) from http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/04/09/bots-in-the-twittersphere/.

References

  • Arias Maldonado, M.: La digitalización de la conversación pública: redes sociales, afectividad política y democracia. Revista de Estudios Políticos (173), 27–54 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, C., Kim, S., Spigel, L.: Electronic Elsewheres: Media Technology and the Experience of Social Space. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bimber, B.: The Internet and Political Transformation: Populism, Community, and Accelerated Pluralism. Polity 31(1), 133–160 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrera, M., Ogonowski, M.: El valor económico del español: España ante el espejo de Polonia. Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales, Madrid (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, A.: Web 2.0: New Challenges for the Study of E-Democracy in an Era of Informational Exuberance. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 5(1), 9–41 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coface. http://www.coface.com/Economic-Studies-and-Country-Risks. Last accessed 19 July 2020 (2020).

  • Democracy Index 2019. A Year of Democratic Setbacks and Popular Protest. A Report by The Economist Intelligence Unit. https://www.eiu.com/topic/democracy-index. Last accessed 12 July 2020 (2020).

  • Drewniak, E.: Wpływ kobiet na politykę państwa na przykładzie Polski i Hiszpanii. Wydawnictwo Promotor, Kraków (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F.: Mediatization as a Challenge: Media Logic Versus Political Logic. In: Kriesi, H., Bochsler, D., Matthes, J., Lavenex, S., Bühlmann, M., Esser, F. (eds.) Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century, pp. 155–176. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forestal, J.: The Architecture of Political Spaces: Trolls, Digital Media, and Deweyan Democracy. American Political Science Review 111(1), 149–161 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • García Guitián, E.: Democracia digital. Discursos sobre participación ciudadana y TIC. Revista de Estudios Políticos 173, 169–193 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, B.-C.: En el enjambre. Herder Editorial, Barcelona (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage Foundation. Index of Economic Freedom, http://www.heritage.org/index/. Last accessed 19 July 2020 (2019).

  • Kersting, N.: The Future of Electronic Democracy. In: Kersting, N., Stein, M., Trent, J. (eds.), Electronic Democracy—State of the Art and Future Perspectives, pp. 11–54. BB publisher, Opladen (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, A. O.: Online, All the Time? A Quantitative Assessment of the Permanent Campaign on Facebook. New Media & Society 18(2), 274–292 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P., Berleson, B., Gaudet, H.: The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. Columbia University Press, Columbia (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren, S.: YouTube Gunmen? Mapping Participatory Media Discourse on School Shooting Videos. Media, Culture & Society 33(1), 123–136 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • López García, G.: Comunicación en red y mutaciones de la esfera pública. en Zer 20, 231–249 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luengo, Ó. G.: Twitter Vs Medios tradicionales ¿Ha implicado twitter un espacio ciudadano real de intercambio de información? In Cotarelo, R., Olmeda, J. A. (eds.) La Democracia del siglo XXI: Política, medios de comunicación, Internet y redes sociales, pp. 409–428. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, Madrid (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Margetts, H.: Public Management Change and e-Government: The Emergence of Digital-era Governance. In: Chadwick, A., Howard, Ph. N. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics. Routledge, London (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. R., Bimber, B., Hindman, M.: The Internet and Four Dimensions of Citizenship. In: Edwards III, G., Jacobs, L. R., Shapiro, R. Y. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media. OUP, Oxford (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilleker, D. G., Jackson, N.: Politicians and Web 2.0: The Current Bandwagon or Changing the Mindset? Paper presented at the Politics: Web 2.0 International Conference, April 17–18, 2008. Royal Holloway, University of London, London. Last accessed 3 February 2020 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, T.: What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Last accessed 23 May 2020. https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html?page=all (2005).

  • Puchades Arce, F. J.: La relación entre los ciudadanos y los representantes políticos a través del email: El caso del Parlamento de la Comunidad Valenciana en la VIII legislatura. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política (IDP) 23, 53–79 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, S., Rutigliano, L., Hyun, K., Jeong, J.: Mapping the Blogosphere: Professional and Citizen-Based Media in the Global News Arena. Journalism 8(3), 235–261 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, I.: Incivility 2.0: A Comparative Analysis of Incivility in Online Political Discussion. Information, Communication & Society 18(2), 121–138 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C.: Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • The E-participation Index 2018. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/About/Overview/E-Participation-Index. Last accessed 15 May 2020.

  • Tsagarousianou, R.: Electronic Democracy: Rhetoric and Reality. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research 24(2), 189–208 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Túñez, M., Sixto, J.: Redes sociales, política y Compromiso 2.0: La comunicación de los diputados en Facebook. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social (66), 1–25 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Óscar G. Luengo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Luengo, Ó.G., Musiał-Karg, M. (2021). Dynamics, Risks and Opportunities of Digitalization: An Introduction. In: Musiał-Karg, M., Luengo, Ó.G. (eds) Digitalization of Democratic Processes in Europe. Studies in Digital Politics and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71815-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics