Skip to main content

Conclusion and Remarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urinary Bladder Pathology

Abstract

The accurate diagnosis of bladder cancer along with the proper evaluation of prognostic and predictive factors is critical for pathology practice in bladder diseases and allows for appropriate disease management and increased rates of patient survival. With its high prevalence and an aging population, pathologists will face more bladder cancer cases in the coming years. Differentiating between benign mimickers and other types of malignancy is central to the practice of pathology. Incorporating molecular advances in pathology is the future trend for the practice. This book summarizes pathologic findings with important prognostic factors, including the staging and grading of bladder cancers and the most recent advances in bladder molecular pathology, and serves a tool for practicing pathologists, clinicians, and trainees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Richters A, Aben KKH, Kiemeney L. The global burden of urinary bladder cancer: an update. World J Urol. 2020;38(8):1895–1904

    Google Scholar 

  2. Global cancer observatory: cancer today. International agency for research on cancer. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today. Cited 01 May 2020.

  3. Cancer Facts and Statistics. American cancer society Atlanta, GA: American cancer society; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, Shariat SF, van Rhijn BW, Comperat E, et al. EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2013. Eur Urol. 2013;64(4):639–53.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moch H. HPA, Ulbright T.M., Reuter V.E. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. 4th ed. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  6. World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/423). . United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  7. World Population Ageing 2017 - Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/397). United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vakar-Lopez F, Shen SS, Zhang S, Tamboli P, Ayala AG, Ro JY. Muscularis mucosae of the urinary bladder revisited with emphasis on its hyperplastic patterns: a study of a large series of cystectomy specimens. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2007;11(6):395–401.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paner GP, Ro JY, Wojcik EM, Venkataraman G, Datta MW, Amin MB. Further characterization of the muscle layers and lamina propria of the urinary bladder by systematic histologic mapping: implications for pathologic staging of invasive urothelial carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(9):1420–9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lobo N, Shariat SF, Guo CC, Fernandez MI, Kassouf W, Choudhury A, et al. What Is the Significance of Variant Histology in Urothelial Carcinoma? Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(4):653–663.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kamat AM, Dinney CP, Gee JR, Grossman HB, Siefker-Radtke AO, Tamboli P, et al. Micropapillary bladder cancer: a review of the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience with 100 consecutive patients. Cancer. 2007;110(1):62–7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sui W, Matulay JT, Onyeji IC, Theofanides MC, James MB, RoyChoudhury A, et al. Contemporary treatment patterns and outcomes of sarcomatoid bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2017;35(7):1055–61.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kim DK, Kim JW, Ro JY, Lee HS, Park JY, Ahn HK, et al. Plasmacytoid Variant Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Clinicopathological Features and Survival Outcomes. J Urol. 2020;204(2):215–223

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ro JY, Shen SS, Lee HI, Hong EK, Lee YH, Cho NH, et al. Plasmacytoid transitional cell carcinoma of urinary bladder: a clinicopathologic study of 9 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32(5):752–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huang L, Kong Q, Liu Z, Wang J, Kang Z, Zhu Y. The Diagnostic Value of MR Imaging in Differentiating T Staging of Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Radiology. 2018;286(2):502–11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heidenreich A, Albers P, Classen J, Graefen M, Gschwend J, Kotzerke J, et al. Imaging studies in metastatic urogenital cancer patients undergoing systemic therapy: recommendations of a multidisciplinary consensus meeting of the Association of Urological Oncology of the German Cancer Society. Urol Int. 2010;85(1):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Witjes JA, Bruins HM, Cathomas R, Comperat EM, Cowan NC, Gakis G, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer: Summary of the 2020 Guidelines. Eur Urol. 2021;79(1):82–104.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Inamura K. Bladder Cancer: New Insights into Its Molecular Pathology. Cancers (Basel). 2018;10(4).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bera K, Schalper KA, Rimm DL, Velcheti V, Madabhushi A. Artificial intelligence in digital pathology - new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019;16(11):703–15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mukhopadhyay S, Feldman MD, Abels E, Ashfaq R, Beltaifa S, Cacciabeve NG, et al. Whole Slide Imaging Versus Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology: A Multicenter Blinded Randomized Noninferiority Study of 1992 Cases (Pivotal Study). Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42(1):39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ehteshami Bejnordi B, Veta M, Johannes van Diest P, van Ginneken B, Karssemeijer N, Litjens G, et al. Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer. Jama. 2017;318(22):2199–210.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nagpal K, Foote D, Liu Y, Chen PC, Wulczyn E, Tan F, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving Gleason scoring of prostate cancer. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:48.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bychkov D, Linder N, Turkki R, Nordling S, Kovanen PE, Verrill C, et al. Deep learning based tissue analysis predicts outcome in colorectal cancer. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):3395.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haijun Zhou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zhou, H., Guo, C.C., Ro, J.Y. (2021). Conclusion and Remarks. In: Zhou, H., Guo, C.C., Ro, J.Y. (eds) Urinary Bladder Pathology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71509-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71509-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71508-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71509-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics