Skip to main content

Quality Improvement Strategies and Outcomes in Pediatric Dialysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pediatric Dialysis

Abstract

To provide dialysis patients with the highest quality of care, each dialysis team must develop a Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to ensure ongoing quality. Quality metric goals can be set by clinical practice guidelines, regulatory and accreditation bodies, and, finally, the care team. In this chapter, we discuss what is needed to establish a QAPI program, briefly review the current regulations that drive the metrics, discuss methods on how to continuously monitor quality metrics, and provide a step-by-step guide on how to start, measure, and sustain a quality improvement project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, in Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. 2001. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Institute of Medicine, Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. 2001. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ. 2016;353:i2139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Institute of Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines we can trust. 2011 [cited 2020 29 Jan]; Available from: https://www.nap.edu/resource/13058/Clinical-Practice-Guidelines-2011-Report-Brief.pdf

  5. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Module 7. Measuring and benchmarking clinical performance. 2013; Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/tools/pf-handbook/mod7.html

  6. International Society of Nephrology. About ISN. 2020; Available from: https://www.theisn.org/about-isn/about-isn

  7. Andreoli SP, et al. American Society of Pediatric Nephrology position paper on linking reimbursement to quality of care. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(8):2263–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schoenbaum, S.C., & Sundwall, D.N., & United States. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Office of the Forum for Qualtiy and Effectiveness in Health Care,, Using clinical practice guidelines to evaluate quality of care. 1995, Rockville, MD: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policty and Research.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Centers for medicare & Medicaid Services. ESRD network organizations. 2017; Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/End-Stage-Renal-Disease/ESRDNetworkOrganizations/index.html

  10. Association, C.s.H., Demonstrating value in pediatrics a measure menu, workbook and guidance for value-based care, payment and reporting. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Medicare program; conditions for coverage for end-stage renal disease facilities-third party payment. 2016; Available from: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/12/14/2016-30016/medicare-program-conditions-for-coverage-for-end-stage-renal-disease-facilities-third-party-payment

  12. The Renal Network. Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI). 2011-2018; Available from: http://therenalnetwork.org/quality-improvement/qapi/

  13. 5-Diamond patient safety program. Available from: https://www.5diamondpatientsafety.org/Home.aspx

  14. Services, C.f.M.M. ESRD quality incentive program. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/ESRDQIP

  15. Warady BA, et al. Consensus guidelines for the prevention and treatment of catheter-related infections and peritonitis in pediatric patients receiving peritoneal dialysis: 2012 update. Perit Dial Int. 2012;32(Suppl 2):S32–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Quality, A.f.H.R.a., Rethinking root cause analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Science of improvement: forming the team. 2020 [cited 2019 14 November]; Available from: http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/ScienceofImprovementFormingtheTeam.aspx

  18. Silver SA, et al. How to begin a quality improvement project. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(5):893–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaudreault-Tremblay MM, et al. Quality improvement in pediatric nephrology-a practical guide. Pediatr Nephrol. 2020;35(2):199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Provost LP, Murray SK. The health care data guide: learning from data for improvement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Langley GJ, Moen RD, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP. The improvement guide. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Weller J, Boyd M, Cumin D. Teams, tribes and patient safety: overcoming barriers to effective teamwork in healthcare. Postgrad Med J. 2014;90(1061):149–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Doran GT. There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. Manag Rev. 1981;70(11)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Science of improvement: establishing measures. 2020 [cited 2020 2 Feb]; Available from: http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/ScienceofImprovementEstablishingMeasures.aspx

  25. McQuillan RF, et al. How to measure and interpret quality improvement data. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(5):908–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Perla RJ, Provost LP, Murray SK. The run chart: a simple analytical tool for learning from variation in healthcare processes. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(1):46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Swed FS, Eisenhart C. Tables for testing randomness of grouping in a sequence of alternatives. Ann Math Stat. 1943;14(1):66–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Silver SA, et al. How to sustain change and support continuous quality improvement. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(5):916–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Currier H, Miller DH. Clinical application: improving quality for children with kidney disease: Unique dimensions. In: Axley B, Robbins KC, editors. Applying continuous quality improvement in clinical practice. Pitman: American Nephrology Nurses’ Association; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Currier, H., Heise, P.S., Tal, L. (2021). Quality Improvement Strategies and Outcomes in Pediatric Dialysis. In: Warady, B.A., Alexander, S.R., Schaefer, F. (eds) Pediatric Dialysis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66861-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66861-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66860-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66861-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics