Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fog Computing and Convolutional Neural Network Enabled Prognosis for Machining Process Optimization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Data Driven Smart Manufacturing Technologies and Applications

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing ((SSAM))

  • 882 Accesses

Abstract

Cloud enabled prognosis systems have been increasingly adopted by manufacturing industries. The effectiveness of the cloud systems is, however, crippled by the high latency of data transfer between shop floors and the cloud. To overcome the limitation, this chapter presents an innovative fog enabled prognosis system for machining process optimization. The system functions include: (1) dynamic prognosis - Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based prognosis is implemented to detect potential faults from customized machining processes. Pre-processing mechanisms of the CNN are designed for partitioning and de-noising monitored signals to strengthen the performance of the system in practical manufacturing situations; (2) an innovative fog enabled prognosis architecture for machining process optimization—it consists of a terminal layer, a fog layer and a cloud layer to minimize data traffic and improve system efficiency. Under the architecture, monitored signals during machining collected on the terminal layer are processed using the trained CNN deployed on the fog layer to efficiently detect abnormal situations. Intensive computing activities like training of the CNN and system re-optimization responding to detected faults are carried out dynamically on the cloud layer to leverage its computation powers. The system was validated in a UK machining company. With the system deployment, the efficiency of energy and production was improved for 29.25% and 16.50% on average. In comparison with a cloud system, this fog system achieved 70.26% reduction in the bandwidth requirement between shop floors and cloud, and 47.02% reduction in data transfer time. This research, sponsored by EU projects, demonstrates that industrial artificial intelligence can facilitate smart manufacturing practices effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References:

  1. Lee J, Wu F, Zhao W, Ghaffari M, Liao L, Siegel D (2014) Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems - Reviews, methodology and applications. Mech Syst Signal Process 42(1–2):314–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gao R, Wang LH, Teti R, Dornfeld D, Kumara S, Mori M, Helu M (2015) Cloud XE “Cloud” -enabled prognosis for manufacturing. CIRP Ann 64(2):749–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tao F, Qi Q, Liu A, Kusiak A (2018) Data-driven smart manufacturing. J Manufact Syst 48:157–169

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baccarelli E, Naranjo P, Scarpiniti M, Shojafar M, Abawajy J (2017) Fog XE “Fog” of everything: Energy-efficient networked computing architectures, research challenges, and a case study. IEEE Access 5:9882–9910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu P, Dhelim S, Ning H, Qiu T (2017) Survey on fog computing: Architecture, key technologies, applications and open issues. J Network Comput Appl 98:27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mukherjee M, Shu L, Wang D (2018) Survey of fog computing: Fundamental, network applications, and research challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. pp 1–1

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wu D, Liu S, Zhang L, Terpenny J, Gao R, Kurfess T, Guzzo J (2017) A fog computing-based framework for process monitoring and prognosis in cyber-manufacturing. J Manufact Syst 43:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lin C, Yang J (2018) Cost-efficient deployment of fog computing systems at logistics centres in Industry 4.0. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 14(10):4603–4611

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wan J, Chen B, Wang S, Xia M, Li D, Liu C (2018) Fog XE “Fog” computing XE “Fog computing” for energy-aware load balancing and scheduling in smart factory. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 14(10):4548–4556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O'Donovan P, Gallagher C, Bruton K, O'Sullivan D (2018) A fog computing industrial cyber-physical system for embedded low-latency machine learning Industry 4.0 applications. Manufact Lett 15:139–142

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mohamed N, Al-Jaroodi J, Jawhar I (2018) Utilizing fog computing for multi-robot systems. 2018 Second IEEE International Conference on Robotic Computing (IRC), CA, USA, January 31–February 2

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu R, Yang B, Zio E, Chen X (2018) Artificial intelligence for fault diagnosis of rotating machinery: A review. Mech Syst Signal Process 108:33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang J, Ma Y, Zhang L, Gao RX, Wu D (2018) Deep learning for smart manufacturing: Methods and applications. J Manufact Syst 48:144–156

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao R, Yan R, Chen Z, Mao K, Wang P, Gao RX (2018) Deep learning XE “Deep learning” and its applications to machine health monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 115:213–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tian J, Morillo C, Azarian MH, Pecht M (2016) Motor bearing fault detection using spectral kurtosis-based feature extraction coupled with k-nearest neighbor distance analysis. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 63(3):1793–1803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou Z, Wen C, Yang C (2016) Fault isolation based on k-nearest neighbor rule for industrial processes. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 63(4):2578–2586

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li F, Wang J, Tang B, Tian D (2014) Life grade recognition method based on supervised uncorrelated orthogonal locality preserving projection and k-nearest neighbor classifier. Neurocomputing 138:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li C, Sanchez R-V, Zurita G, Cerrada M, Cabrera D, Vasquez RE (2015) Multimodal deep support vector classification with homologous features and its application to gearbox fault diagnosis. Neurocomputing 168:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou J, Yang Y, Ding S, Zi Y, Wei M (2018) A fault detection and health monitoring scheme for ship propulsion systems using SVM technique. IEEE Access 6:16207–16215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang D, Qian L, Mao B, Huang C, Huang B, Si Y (2018) A data-driven design for fault detection of wind turbines using random forests and XGboost. IEEE Access 6:21020–21031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdullah A (2018) Ultrafast transmission line fault detection using a DWT-based ANN XE “ANN” . IEEE Trans Ind Appl 54(2):1182–1193

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Luo B, Wang H, Liu H, Li B, Peng F (2019) Early fault detection of machine tools based on deep learning and dynamic identification. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 66(1):509–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ince T, Kiranyaz S, Eren L, Askar M, Gabbouj M (2016) Real-time motor fault detection by 1-D convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 63(11):7067–7075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xia M, Li T, Xu L, Liu L, de Silva CW (2018) Fault diagnosis for rotating machinery using multiple sensor and convolutional neural networks. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 23(1):101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu Z, Guo Y, Sealy M, Liu Z (2016) Energy consumption and process sustainability of hard milling with tool wear progression. J Mater Process Technol 229:305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sealy M, Liu Z, Zhang D, Guo Y, Liu Z (2016) Energy consumption and modeling in precision hard milling. J Clean Product 135:1591–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chooruang K, Mangkalakeeree P (2016) Wireless heart rate monitoring system using MQTT. Procedia Comput Sci 86:160–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmitt A, Carlier F, Renault V (2018) Dynamic bridge generation for IoT data exchange via the MQTT protocol. Procedia Comput Sci 130:90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liang YC, Li WD, Wang S, Lu X (2019) Big Data based dynamic scheduling optimization for energy efficient machining. Engineering 5:646–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang S, Liang YC, Li WD, Cai X (2018) Big data enabled intelligent immune system for energy efficient manufacturing management. J Clean Product 195:507–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Franc V, Čech J (2018) Learning CNN XE “CNN” s XE “CNNs” from weakly annotated facial images. Image Vis Comput 77:10–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Banerjee S, Das S (2018) Mutual variation of information on transfer-CNN XE “CNN” for face recognition with degraded probe samples. Neurocomputing 310:299–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Liang YC, Lu X, Li WD, Wang S (2018) Cyber Physical System and Big Data enabled energy efficient machining optimization. J Clean Product 187:46–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu Q, Qin S, Chai T (2013) Decentralized fault diagnosis of continuous annealing processes based on multilevel PCA XE “ principle component analysis (PCA) “. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 10(3):687–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Guo Y, Li G, Chen H, Hu Y, Li H, Xing L, Hu W (2017) An enhanced PCA XE “ principle component analysis (PCA) “ method with Savitzky-Golay method for VRF system sensor fault detection and diagnosis. Energy Build 142:167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kyprianou A, Phinikarides A, Makrides G, Georghiou G (2015) Definition and computation of the degradation rates of photovoltaic systems of different technologies with robust Principal Component Analysis. IEEE J Photo 5(6):1698–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wu J., Chen W., Huang K., Tan T., 2011. Partial least squares based subwindow search for pedestrian detection. 2011 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yu Z, Chen H, You J, Liu J, Wong H, Han G, Li L (2015) Adaptive fuzzy consensus clustering framework for clustering analysis of cancer data. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf 12(4):887–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yan R, Ma Z, Kokogiannakis G, Zhao Y (2016) A sensor fault detection strategy for air handling units using cluster analysis. Autom Construct 70:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Navi M, Meskin N, Davoodi M (2018) Sensor fault detection and isolation of an industrial gas turbine using partial adaptive KPCA XE “principle component analysis (PCA)". J Process Control 64:37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rimpault X, Bitar-Nehme E, Balazinski M, Mayer J (2018) Online monitoring and failure detection of capacitive displacement sensor in a Capball device using fractal analysis. Measurement 118:23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Roueff F, Vehel J (2018) A regularization approach to fractional dimension estimation. World Scientific Publisher, Fractals and Beyond

    Google Scholar 

  43. Teti R, Jemielniak K, O’Donnell G, Dornfeld D (2010) Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Annals – Manufact Technol 59:717–739

    Google Scholar 

  44. Axinte D, Gindy N (2004) Assessment of the effectiveness of a spindle power signal for tool condition monitoring in machining processes. Int J Prod Res 42(13):2679–2691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Feng Z, Zuo M, Chu F (2010) Application of regularization dimension to gear damage assessment. Mech Syst Signal Process 24(4):1081–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rajpurkar P, Hannun A, Haghpanahi M, Bourn C, Ng A (2018) Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection with convolutional neural networks. arXiv:1707.01836

  47. Ioffe S, Szegedy C (2015) Batch normalization: Accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. arXiv:1502.03167

  48. Priddy K, Keller P (2005) Artificial neural networks. Bellingham, Wash. <1000 20th St. Bellingham WA 98225–6705 USA>: SPIE

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hinton G, Srivastava N, Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Salakhutdinov R (2012) Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv:1207.0580v1

  50. Ke X, Cao W, Lv F (2017) Relationship between complexity and precision of convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Symposium on Advances in Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (ISAEECE 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  51. He K, Sun J (2014) Convolutional neural networks at constrained time cost. arXiv:1412.1710

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Environment and Computing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK

    Y. C. Liang, W. D. Li, X. Lu & S. Wang

  2. School of Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China

    W. D. Li

Authors
  1. Y. C. Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. D. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. X. Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. D. Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Environment and Computing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK

    Weidong Li

  2. Faculty of Engineering, Environment and Computing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK

    Yuchen Liang

  3. Faculty of Engineering, Environment and Computing, Coventry University, Coventry, UK

    Sheng Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liang, Y.C., Li, W.D., Lu, X., Wang, S. (2021). Fog Computing and Convolutional Neural Network Enabled Prognosis for Machining Process Optimization. In: Li, W., Liang, Y., Wang, S. (eds) Data Driven Smart Manufacturing Technologies and Applications. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66849-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66849-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66848-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66849-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation