Skip to main content

Beyond Coverage and Controversy: The ACA’s Distinctly American Approach to Healthcare Coverage and Reform

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Affordable Care Act as a National Experiment
  • 397 Accesses

Abstract

The number of Americans who lacked health insurance coverage remained high prior to the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010 (Cohen et al. Health insurance coverage: early release of estimates from the National Health Insurance, 2018. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control; 2019). By 2016, over 20 million people gained coverage as a result of the law (Garrett and Gangopadhyaya. Who gained health insurance coverage under the ACA and where do they live? Washington: Urban Institute; 2016). Several key provisions, such as the Medicaid expansion and mandate for individuals to maintain health insurance coverage, have been controversial and challenged in federal court (see Chap. 8). While coverage gains and court challenges dominated headlines about the law in the first decade, other features of the ACA—such as its legislative history and approach to improving the value of healthcare delivered in the United States—are distinctive and worthy of a closer look. These and other features of ACA demonstrate that US policymakers can move closer to the goals of universal coverage and affordable cost for patients while deploying a distinctly American approach to achieving them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    P.L. 111-48 and P.L. 111-52.

  2. 2.

    Section 3021 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

  3. 3.

    Section 6301 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

  4. 4.

    Section 104, Title I, Division N of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020.

References

  1. Cohen RA, Terlizzi EP, Martinez ME. Health insurance coverage: early release of estimates from the National Health Insurance, 2018. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garrett B, Gangopadhyaya A. Who gained health insurance coverage under the ACA and where do they live? Urban Institute: Washington; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joint Committee on Taxation. Estimates of federal tax expenditures for fiscal years 2011–2015. Washington: Joint Committee on Taxation; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ku L, Steinmetz E, Brantley E, Holla N, Bruen B. The American Health Care Act: economic and employment consequences for states. New York: Commonwealth Fund; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Warren E. My first term plan for reducing health care costs in American and transition to Medicare for all. Warren Democrats. [Online] 2019. https://elizabethwarren.com/plans/m4a-transition.

  6. Baucus M. Chairman’s news. U.S. Senate Committee on Finance. [Online] 12 Nov 2008. https://www.finance.senate.gov/chairmans-news/baucus-calls-health-care-reform-central-to-restoring-americas-economy.

  7. Levine M, Buntin M. Why has growth in spending for FFS Medicare slowed? Washington: Congressional Budget Office; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hartman M, Martin A, Espinosa N, Catlin A. National Health Care Spending in 2016: spending and enrollment growth slow after initial coverage expansion: Health Affairs; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  9. MedPAC. A data book: health care spending and the Medicare program. Washington: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zuckerman R, Sheingold S, Orav J, Ruhter J, Epstein A. Readmissions, observation, and the hospital readmissions reduction program. Boston: New England Journal of Medicine; 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Glied S, Black M, Lauerman W, Snowden S Considering “Single Payer” proposals in the U.S.: lessons from abroad. The Commonwealth Fund. [Online] 11 Apr 2019. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/2019/apr/considering-single-payer-proposals-lessons-from-abroad.

  12. Gunja M, Collins S. Who are the remaining uninsured, and why do they lack coverage? The Commonwealth Fund. [Online] August 28, 2019. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2019/aug/who-are-remaining-uninsured-and-why-do-they-lack-coverage.

  13. Dorn S. Uninsured and dying because of it: updating the institute of medicine analysis on the impact of uninsurance on mortality. The Urban Institute. [Online] 2008. http://www.urban.org/publications/411588.html.

  14. Avanian JZ. Unmet health needs of uninsured adults in the United States. J Am Med Assoc. 2000:2061–9.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tikkanen R, Osborn R. Does the US ration health care? The Commonwealth Fund. [Online] 11 July 2019. https://www.commonwealthfund.org/blog/2019/does-united-states-ration-health-care.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn Maree Bishop .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bishop, S.M. (2021). Beyond Coverage and Controversy: The ACA’s Distinctly American Approach to Healthcare Coverage and Reform. In: Selker, H.P. (eds) The Affordable Care Act as a National Experiment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66726-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics