Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Policy Process: Implementation of Education Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Education Policy, Theories, and Trends in the 21st Century

Part of the book series: Policy Implications of Research in Education ((PIRE,volume 12))

  • 580 Accesses

Abstract

After focusing on the first stages of the policymaking process, in which policymakers define issues and construct educational priorities, this chapter draws attention to later stages of the process, including policy implementation and evaluation (Jann and Wegrich 2007). Research on these topics focuses on the instruments employed by policymakers, and the effects of these instruments on implementation and the evaluation of the results of policy programs. In this chapter, we focus on several issues relating to the implementation of education policy: (a) we discuss the manner in which policymakers choose policy instruments and deploy supervision to make sure that strict implementation of the goals is carried out; (b) we delve into how participants in the implementation of education policy at the bottom of the hierarchy are involved in the development of the applied policy, and how their actions shape the nature of the policy at the institutional and national levels; (c) we discuss the various functions that the evaluation of a policy executes; and (d) we discuss the manner in which systemic changes and reforms in recent decades have amounted to a central strategy in the implementation of education policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Addi-Raccah, A., & Grinshtain, Y. (2018). Teachers’ capital in view of intensive parental involvement in school: The case of teachers in high socio-economic status schools in Israel. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 599–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aflalo, A. (2012). Contradictions in teachers’ perceptions: The hidden barrier to the assimilation of computer technologies. Dapim, 54, 167–139. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Avigur-Eshel, A., & Berkovich, I. (2019). Introducing managerialism into national educational contexts through pseudo-conflict: A discursive institutionalist analysis. International Journal of Educational Development, 68, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkovich, I. (2017). Educational reform hyperwaves: Reconceptualizing Cuban’s theories of change. Journal of Educational Change, 18(4), 413–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berriet-Solliec, M., Labarthe, P., Laurent, C., & Baudry, J. (2011, February 17–18). Empirical validity of the evaluation of public policies: Models of evaluation and quality of evidence. 122nd EAAE Seminar: Evidence-Based Agricultural and Rural Policy Making: Methodological and Empirical Challenges of Policy Evaluation,Ancona, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bialik, G., Gibton, D., & Dror, Y. (2018). Now you see it, now you don’t: Understanding high conflict and high ambiguity as core policy dimensions through field-level leaders’ perspectives. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(1), 52–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjork, L. G., & Blase, J. (2009). The micropolitics of school district decentralization. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(3), 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M., Hart, P., & Kuipers, S. (2008). The politics of policy evaluation. In M. Moran, M. Rein, & R. E. Goodin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 319–335). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Forecast for additional classrooms in schools, 2012–2016. Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics. (2014). The face of Israeli society report, No. 7. Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Choshen, M., & Korach, M. (2014). Jerusalem: Facts and trends 2014. Jerusalem: The Jerusalem Institute for Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, C. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  •  Cohen, D. K. (1995). What is the system in systemic reform? Educational Researcher, 24(9), 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. K., & Mehta, J. D. (2017). Why reform sometimes succeeds: Understanding the conditions that produce reforms that last. American Educational Research Journal, 54(4), 644–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (2006). An international and historical perspective on national education reforms. In D. Inbar (Ed.), Towards educational revolution? (pp. 22–34). Jerusalem and Tel Aviv: Van Leer Institute and Hakibbutz Hameuchad. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dadon-Golan, Z., BenDavid-Hadar, I., & Klein, J. (2019). Equity in education: The Israeli case. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(7), 1670–1685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dror, Y. (2006). Past reforms in the Israeli education system: What history can teach us about the Dovrat report? In D. Inbar (Ed.), Towards educational revolution? (pp. 35–39). Jerusalem and Tel Aviv: Van Leer Institute and Hakibbutz Hameuchad. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (1992). Educational reform and the ecology of schooling. Teachers College Record, 93(4), 610–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (2000). Those who ignore the past…: 12 ‘easy’ lessons for the next millennium. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, R. F. (1995). Structural reform and educational practice. Educational Researcher, 24(9), 23–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1992). Successful school improvement: The implementation perspective and beyond. London: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2000). The return of large־scale reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganon-Shilon, S., & Schechter, C. (2019). Shared sense-making processes within a national reform implementation: Principals’ voices. Leadership and Policy in Schools. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/15700763.2019.1696370

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganon-Shilon, S., Shaked, H., & Schechter, C. (2020). Principals’ voices pertaining to shared sense-making processes within a generally-outlined pedagogical reform implementation. International Journal of Leadership in Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/13603124.2020.1770864

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassner, D., & Gofen, A. (2018). Street-level management: A clientele-agent perspective on implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 551–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaziel, H. H. (1994). Implementing reforms in a centralised education system: The case of Israeli education. Oxford Review of Education, 20(2), 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaziel, H. H. (2010). Why educational reforms fail: The emergence and failure of an educational reform: A case study from Israel. In J. Zajda (Ed.), Globalisation, ideology and education policy reforms (pp. 49–62). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibton, D. (2003). Autonomy, anomie, integration and anarchy: Legislation and adjudication as devices for executing educational reforms and implementing educational policy. In Y. Dror, D. Nevo, & R. Shapira (Eds.), Turns and returns in Israeli education policy guidelines for the 2000s (pp. 407–454). Tel Aviv: Ramot. [In Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Gofen, A. (2014). Mind the gap: Dimensions and influence of street־level divergence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 473–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gofen, A., Sella, S., & Gassner, D. (2019). Levels of analysis in street-level bureaucracy research. In P. Hupe (Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy (pp. 336–350). London: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldspink, C. (2007). Rethinking educational reform: A loosely coupled and complex systems perspective. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(1), 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, Q., Sammons, P., & Chen, J. (2018). How principals of successful schools enact education policy: Perceptions and accounts from senior and middle leaders. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(3), 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanberger, A. (2001). What is the policy problem? Methodological challenges in policy evaluation. Evaluation, 7(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson, N. (2015, April 30). Sixty percent increase in 4 years in Israeli matriculation exams in East Jerusalem. Haaretz. Retrieved from http://www.haaretz.co.il. [in Hebrew].

  • Helgøy, I., & Homme, A. (2006). Policy tools and institutional change: Comparing education policies in Norway, Sweden and England. Journal of Public Policy, 26(02), 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, F. M. (2010). The same thing over and over. Cambrige, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, M. (2009). Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration, 52(2), 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hupe, P., & Buffat, A. (2014). A public service gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street־level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4), 548–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jann, W., & Wegrich, K. (2007). Theories of the policy cycle. In F. Fisher, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 43–62). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzir, S., & Perry-Hazan, L. (2019). Legitimizing public schooling and innovative education policies in strict religious communities: The story of the new Haredi public education stream in Israel. Journal of Education Policy, 34(2), 215–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lascoumes, P., & Le Gales, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments – From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B. (2011). Policy as numbers: Ac/counting for educational research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(4), 355–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, M. (2010). Street־level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service (30th Ann. ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madaus, G. F., Scriven, M., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, N., & Yonah, Y. (2009). Nationalism, multiculturalism and core curriculum in Israel: Between inclusion and exclusion. Alpayim, 34, 65–81. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, A. (2010). Policy success, policy failure and grey areas in-between. Journal of Public Policy, 30(3), 345–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, L. M., & Elmore, R. F. (1987). Getting the job done: Alternative policy instruments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizrahi-Shtelman, R. (2019). Role identity and sensemaking as institutional mechanisms for policy translation: The case of school principals and education reforms in Israel. Leadership and Policy in Schools. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/15700763.2019.1638422

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, R. (2010). Guerrilla employees: Should managers nurture, tolerate, or terminate them? Public Administration Review, 70(1), 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry-Hazan, L. (2015). Court-led educational reforms in political third rails: Lessons from the litigation over ultra-religious Jewish schools in Israel. Journal of Education Policy, 30(5), 713–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pülzl, H., & Treib, O. (2007). Implementing public policy. In F. Fisher, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reingold, R., & Avidov-Ungar, O. (2018). ‘There should be more cooperation in setting the policy’: Israeli stakeholders’ perceptions of their appropriate role in implementing a new educational reform. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(6), 731–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resh, N., & Kfir, D. (2004). Educational integration in Israel: Thirty years of hesitant policy in view of changing ideology. Megamot, 43(1), 63–33. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Rom, N., & Eyal, O. (2019). Sensemaking, sense-breaking, sense-giving, and sense-taking: How educators construct meaning in complex policy environments. Teaching and Teacher Education, 78, 62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadovnik, A. R. (2006). Qualitative research and public policy. In F. Fischer & G. J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 417–427). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. B. (1982). The culture of the school and the problem of change. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechter, C., & Shaked, H. (2017). Leaving fingerprints: Principals’ considerations while implementing education reforms. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(3), 242–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaked, H., & Schechter, C. (2017). School principals as mediating agents in education reforms. School Leadership & Management, 37(1–2), 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavit, Y. (2013). Vocational / technological education on second thought. Jerusalem: Taub Center. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulock, N. (1999). The paradox of policy analysis: If it is not used, why do we produce so much of it? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18(2), 226–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicron, M. (1986). Mass immigration- its dimensions, characteristics, and influence on the Israeli population structure. In M. Naor (Ed.), Immigrants and transit camps (pp. 1948–1952). Jerusalem: Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Slakmon, B. (2017). Educational technology policy in Israel. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 25(1), 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swirski, S., & Dagan-Buzaglo, N. (2009). Differentiation, inequality and loose control. Tel Aviv: Adva Center. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Tummers, L. (2013). Policy alienation and the power of professionals: Confronting new policies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tzameret, Z. (2005). Zalman Arran and the ‘productivization’ of the Oriental Jews. In A. Barley, D. Gutwein, & T. Friling (Eds.), Society and economics in Israel: A historical and contemporary view (pp. 326–295). Jerusalem and Kiryat Sde-Boker: Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi and the Ben Gurion Institute for Israel Studies. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedung, E. (2017). Public policy and program evaluation. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vurgan, Y. (2007). The education system in the Jewish ultra-Orthodox sector – Situation report. Jerusalem: The Israeli Parliament. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Vurgan, Y. (2010a). Computers in schools – Situation report. Jerusalem: The Israeli Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vurgan, Y. (2010b). Claims about ethnic discrimination in admission to the recognized unofficial educational institutions. Jerusalem: The Israeli Parliament. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S. C., Bagley, C., Lumby, J., Hamilton, T., Woods, P., & Roberts, A. (2016). What is ‘policy’ and what is ‘policy response’? An illustrative study of the implementation of the leadership standards for social justice in Scotland. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weissblei, E. (2012). Core studies in the Jewish ultra-Orthodox educational system. Jerusalem: The Israeli Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissblei, E. (2013). Israeli education system- Major issues discussed by the Education, Culture and Sport Committe. Jerusalem: The Israeli Parliament. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K. (2006). Quantitative methods for policy analysis. In F. Fischer & G. J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 349–368). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D. (2006). Qualitative-interpretive methods in policy research. In F. Fischer & G. J. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods (pp. 405–415). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yonah, Y., & Shenhav, Y. (2005). What is multiculturalism? The politics of difference in Israel. Tel Aviv: Babel. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, A. (2013). Grades aren’t everything: Revamping pedagogic discourse. Tel Aviv: Hapoalim. [in Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Education and Psychology, The Open University of Israel, Ra’anana, Israel

    Izhak Berkovich

Authors
  1. Izhak Berkovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Berkovich, I. (2021). The Policy Process: Implementation of Education Policy. In: Education Policy, Theories, and Trends in the 21st Century. Policy Implications of Research in Education, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63103-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63103-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63102-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63103-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation