Skip to main content

Learning from Past Disasters to Prepare for the Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Disaster Risk Reduction for Resilience

Abstract

This chapter revisits a well-known paradox in disaster studies: why does humankind suffer more losses while knowing more and in spite of innumerable existing disaster risk reduction policies? This paradox questions the ability of societies to learn from disasters, which is the issue that this chapter investigates. The first part presents the gap existing between a logical requirement to learn from the past while trying to mitigate if not prevent disasters. The gap – between possessing more knowledge in the face of mounting losses – still exists in spite of the capacities to reconsider DRR policies and to promote new tools helping decision-making processes, as with knowledge management systems (KMSs). Such shortcomings in addition to certain aspects of human nature, such as a government’s very short interest and attention span in any given crisis, seek to identify factors explaining why capacity to learn is limited today. The second part of this chapter draws attention to why, as well as how, to take into account local settings and local knowledge when framing risk-reducing policies. The latter are still highly compartmentalized for a variety of challenging reasons. However, opportunities and challenges demand immediate consideration. Societies must bridge, blend or mainstream their policy concerns about planning for future climate change adaptation (CCA) with attempts at policy development for disaster risk reduction (DRR) today, especially because hydrological and meteorological extremes that were expected by 2050 are beginning to confront societies now.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, D. (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13, 2707–2716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • André, C. (2013). Analyse des dommages liés aux submersions marines et évaluation des coûts induits aux habitations à partir de données d’assurance. Perspectives apportées par les tempêtes Johanna (2008) et Xynthia (2010) (Thèse de doctorat en géographie). Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonsich, M. (2011). Re-thinking territory. Progress in Human Geography, 35(3), 422–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauval, C., Yepes, H., Palacios, P., Segovia, M., Alvarado, A., Font, Y., Aguilar, J., Troncoso, L., & Vaca, S. (2013). An earthquake catalogue for seismic hazard assessment in Ecuador. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103(2A), 773–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2001 [original: 1986]). La société du risque. Sur la voie d’une autre modernité. Paris, France: Aubier-Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (2002). Back to the future: Ecosystem dynamics and local knowledge. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems (pp. 121–146). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann, J., & von Teichman, K. (2010). Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: Key challenges – scales, knowledge, and norms. Sustainability Science, 5(2), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boissier, L. (2013). La mortalité liée aux crues torrentielles dans le sud de la France: Une approche de la vulnérabilité humaine face à l’inondation (Thèse de doctorat en géographie). Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2001). Science de la science et réflexivité. Paris, France: Raisons d’agir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazaux, E., Meur-Ferec, C., & Peinturier, C. (2019). Le régime d’assurance des catastrophes naturelles à l’épreuve des risques côtiers. Aléas versus aménités, le cas particulier des territoires littoraux. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography [En ligne], Espace, Société, Territoire, document 898, mis en ligne le 23 mai 2019, consulté le 02 juin 2019. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/cybergeo/32249.

  • Cote, M., & Nightingale, A. (2011). Resilience thinking meets social theory: Situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Progress in Human Geography, 36(4), 475–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRED. (2019). Base de données EM-DAT. http://www.emdat.be.

  • D’Ercole, R., & Metzger, P. (2009). La vulnérabilité territoriale: Une nouvelle approche des risques en milieu urbain. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography [online]. http://cybergeo.revues.org/22022.

  • D’Ercole, R., Hardy, S., & Robert, J. (2009). Balance de los accidentes y desastres ocurridos en La Paz, Lima y Quito (1970-2007). Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Études Andines, 38(3), 433–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalezios, N. R., Tarquis, A. M., & Eslamian, S. (2017). Chapter 5 droughts. In N. R. Dalezios (Ed.), Environmental hazards methodologies for risk assessment and management (pp. 177–210). London: International Water Association Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • EFDRR. (2016). How does Europe link DRR and CCA? Working paper. Working group on Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuillet, T., Chauveau, E., & Pourinet, L. (2012). Xynthia est-elle exceptionnelle ? Réflexions sur l’évolution et les temps de retour des tempêtes, des marées de tempête, et des risques de surcotes associés sur la façade atlantique française. Norois, 222, 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fra.Paleo, U. (2019). Timescape of disaster risk governance in contemporary Japan: Neither state of normalcy nor constancy in regulation. PLoS One, 14(4), e0215164. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Acosta, V. (2005). El riesgo como construcción social y la construcción social del riesgo. Desacatos, 19, 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glantz, M. H. (2015). The Antalya statement – an expert forum on disaster risk reduction (DRR) in a changing climate: Lessons learned about lessons learned. Convened by USAID, CCB/CU, WMO, TSMS, avec le soutien de NOAA et GFDRR, Antalya, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glantz, M. H., Baudoin, M.-A., de la Poterie, A. T., & Naranjo, L. (2014). Working with a changing climate, not against it – hydro-meteorological disaster risk reduction: A survey of lessons learned for resilient adaptation to a changing climate. CCB/INSTAAR. http://www.ccb-boulder.org/1391-2/.

  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledge: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (1998). The political science of risk perception. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 59(1), 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jean, Y., & Calenge, C. (2002). Lire les territoires. Tours, France: MSH.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman, I., Gaillard, J.-C., Lewis, J., & Mercer, J. (2016). Learning from the history of disaster vulnerability and resilience research and practice for climate change. Natural Hazards, 82, 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R., Nicholls, R., & Thomalla, F. (2003). Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept? Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 5(1–2), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlicke, C., & Steinfuhrer, A. (2010). Social capacity building for natural hazards: A conceptual frame. Cap-Haz net report, Leipzig, Germany, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J., & Kelman, I. (2012). The good, the bad and the ugly: Disaster risk reduction (DRR) versus disaster risk creation (DRC). PLoS Currents Disasters, Ed.1, 4, e4f8d4eaec6af8. https://doi.org/10.1371/4f8d4eaec6af8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Peláez, J., & Pigeon, P. (2011). Co-evolution between structural mitigation measures and urbanization in France and Colombia: A comparative analysis of disaster risk management policies based on disaster databases. Habitat International, 35(4), 573–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, N., Chester, D., Sangster, H., Todd, B., & Hooke, J. (2012). The significance of Gilbert F. White’s 1945 paper “human adjustment to floods” in the development of risk and hazard management. Progress in Physical Geography, 36(1), 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnan, A. K., Duvat, V., & Garnier, E. (2012). Reconstituer les “trajectoires de vulnérabilité” pour penser différemment l’adaptation au changement climatique. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 20(1), 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menoni, S., & Margottini, C. (2011). Inside risk: A strategy for sustainable risk mitigation. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 369 p.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michellier, C., Pigeon, P., Paillet, A., Trefon, T., Dewitte, O., & Kervyn, F. (2020). The challenging place of natural hazards in disaster risk reduction conceptual models: Insights from Central Africa and the European Alps. International Journal of Disaster Risk Sciences, 11, 316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-020-00273-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T., Tanner, T., & Wilkinson, E. (2006). Overcoming the barriers: Mainstreaming climate change adaptation in developing countries. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17956.37765.

  • Mitchell, T., & van Aalst, M. (2008). Convergence of disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. A review for DFID. https://www.preventionweb.net/files/7853_ConvergenceofDRRandCCA1.pdf.

  • Mitchell, T., Guha-Sapir, D., Hall, J., Lovell, E., Muir-Wood, R., Norris, A., Scott, L., & Wallemacq, P. (2014). Setting, measuring and monitoring targets for reducing disaster risk. Recommendations for post-2015 international policy frameworks. London: Overseas Development Institute, consulté en ligne le 11 janvier 2016. http://www.odi.org/publications/8448-setting-measuring-monitoring-targets-disaster-risk-reduction-recommendations-post-2015-international-policy-frameworks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2005). Introduction à la pensée complexe. Paris, France: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobert, S., Rebotier, J., Vallette, C., Bouisset, C., & Clarimont, S. (2017). Resilience for the Anthropocene? Shedding light on the forgotten temporalities shaping post-crisis management in the French Sud Ouest. Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses, 5(3), 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nocquet, J.-M., Jarrin, P., Vallée, M., Mothes, P. A., Grandin, R., Rolandone, F., Delouis, B., Yepes, H., Font, Y., Fuentes, D., et al. (2017). Supercycle at the Ecuadorian subduction zone revealed after the 2016 Pedernales earthquake. Nature Geoscience, 10, 145–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, R., & Pigeon, P. (2015). A national Public Private Partnership (PPP) platform for risk data sharing to stimulate participative governance in France. UNISDR Scientific and Technical Advisory Group, Case Studies, consulté en ligne le 22 janvier 2016. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/workspace/7935_rnussbaumpppdrrinfrance.pdf.

  • O’Brien, K., Eriksen, S., Nygaard, L. P., & Schjolden, A. (2007). Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Climate Policy, 7(1), 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, K., Sygna, L., Leichenko, R., Adger, N., Barnett, J., Mitchell, T., Schipper, L., Tanner, T., Vogel, C., & Mortreux, C. (2008). Disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation and human security. A commissioned report for the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. https://www.unisdr.org/files/7946_GECHSReport3081.pdf.

  • Olcina, J., Sauri, D., Hernández, M., & Ribas, A. (2016). Flood policy in Spain: A review for the period 1983-2013. Disaster Prevention and Management, 25(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-05-2015-0108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passeron, J.-C. (1995). L’espace mental de l’enquête (I). La transformation de l’information sur le monde dans les sciences sociales. Enquête, 1, 13–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, S., Zêzere, J. L., Quaresma, I., Santos, P. P., & Santos, M. (2015). Mortality patterns of hydro-geomorphologic disasters. Risk Analysis, 36(6), 1188–1210. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestre, D. (2006). Introduction aux science studies. Paris, France: La Découverte.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Picquout, A. (2013). Impacts géographiques de l’éruption de 2010 du volcan Merapi, Java, Indonésie (Thèse de doctorat en géographie). Université Panthéon-Sorbonne – Paris I, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielke, R., Jr., & Landsea, C. (1998). Normalized hurricane damages in the United States: 1925-1995. Weather and Forecasting, 13, 621–631. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/USdmg/index.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigeon, P. (2012). Apports de la résilience à la géographie des risques: l’exemple de La Faute-sur-mer (Vendée, France). Vertigo – La revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement, 12(1), 1–19. http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/12031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigeon, P. (2013). Flood risk and watershed management conflicts in France: Upper catchment management of the river Rhone. In J. Warner, A. Van Buuren, & J. Edelenbos (Eds.), Making space for the river. Governance experiences with multifunctional river flood management in the US and Europe. London: IWA Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigeon, P. (2017). Dike risk: Revealing the academic links between disaster risk reduction, sustainable development, climate change and migration. In K. Sudmeier-Rieux, M. Fernández, I. Penna, I. Jaboyedoff, & J. C. Gaillard (Eds.), Identifying emerging issues in disaster risk reduction, migration, climate change and sustainable development. Shaping debates and policies. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigeon, P., & Rebotier, J. (2016). Disaster prevention policies. A challenging and critical outlook. London: ISTE-Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigeon, P., & Rebotier, J. (2019). Que nous apprennent les bases de données sur les désastres associés aux séismes? Physiogéo, 14, 113–146. https://journals.openedition.org/physio-geo/9036.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigeon, P., Rebotier, J., & Guézo, B. (2018). Ce que peut apporter la resilience à la prevention des désastres: exemples en Lavours et en Chautagne (Ain, Savoie). Annales de Géographie, 719(1), 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pred, A. (1984). Place as historically contingent process: Structuration and the time-geography of becoming places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 74(2), 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy, S. (2016). Disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA). Presentation for the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebotier, J. (2012). Vulnerability conditions and risk representations in Latin-America: Framing the territorializing urban risk. Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 391–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebotier, J. (2016). El riesgo y su gestión en Ecuador. Una mirada de geografía social y política. Quito, Ecuador: PUCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebotier, J., Pigeon, P., & Metzger, P. (2019). Returning social context to seismic risk knowledge and management. Lessons learned from an interdisciplinary research in the city of Esmeraldas, Ecuador. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography [online]. https://journals.openedition.org/cybergeo/31787.

  • Red Cross and Red Crescent (2013). A guide to mainstreaming disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. IFRC.org, Geneva. (pp. 5, passim).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reghezza, M., & Rufat, S. (2015). Résiliences. Sociétés et territoires face à l’incertitude, aux risques et aux catastrophes. Paris, France: ISTE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renaud, F., Sudmeier-Rieux, K., & Estrella, M. S. (2013). The role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction. Tokyo, Japan: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revault D’allonnes, M. (1999). Le dépérissement de la politique. Paris, France: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipper, E. L. F. (2009). Meeting at the crossroads: Exploring the linkages between climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction. Climate and Development, 1(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.3763/cdev.2009.0004.

  • Schipper, L. E., & Pelling, M. (2006). Disaster risk, climate change and international development: Scope for, and challenges to, integration. Disasters, 30(1), 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R., Pulhin, J. M., & Pereira, J. J. (2010). Climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction: Overview of issues and challenges. Community, Environment and Disaster Risk Management, 4, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, G. L., & Dooling, S. (2013). Flame and fortune in California: The material and political dimensions of vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1410–1423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tear Fund (2008). Disaster risk reduction and the post 2012 framework. Bonn climate change talks. June 2–13, Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR. (2015). Global assessment report. Making development sustainable: The future of disaster risk management (311, pp. 307 p. + index). Genève: United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, online: https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/42809.

  • Walker, J., & Cooper, M. (2011). Genealogies of resilience: From systems ecology to the political economy of crisis adaptation. Security Dialogue, 42(2), 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, J., & Van Buuren, A. (2011). Implementing room for the river: Narratives of success and failure in Kampen, the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(4), 779–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weichselgartner, J., & Pigeon, P. (2015). The role of knowledge in disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Sciences, 6(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-015-0052-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, G. F., Kates, R. W., & Burton, I. (2001). Knowing better and losing even more: The use of knowledge in hazard management. Global Environmental Change Part B: Environmental Hazards, 3, 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge Robert Jay Ross, CCB, for his support in the preparation of this paper, and Prof. Saeid Eslamian, Center Director of Excellence in Risk Management and Natural Hazards, Isfahan University of Technology, for his assistance in editing the chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Pigeon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rebotier, J., Pigeon, P., Glantz, M.H. (2021). Learning from Past Disasters to Prepare for the Future. In: Eslamian, S., Eslamian, F. (eds) Handbook of Disaster Risk Reduction for Resilience. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61278-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics