Skip to main content

A Conceptual Unified Model for Assessing Improvements in Sustainability and Resilience in Water Distribution Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Disaster Risk Reduction for Resilience

Abstract

Communities around the world are looking for ways to provide reliable and cost-effective infrastructure services to end users. Sustainable and resilient infrastructures are the demands of the day. Both public and private sectors demand resilient and sustainable infrastructure to satisfy the rising consumer demands and foster economic development. While a resilient infrastructure fares well under a catastrophic disaster event by withstanding strongly and recovering quickly, a sustainable infrastructure can function effectively over the lifetime without placing excessive demands on limited resources. There is increased awareness among government entities, municipalities, and communities about the necessity for considering both sustainability and resilience in the decision-making process. There have also been attempts within the research community to develop a common framework for sustainable and resilient infrastructures. However, the studies remained too general and limited to expressions of the need only and not often relevant to water distribution system (WDS). The objective of this chapter is to present a conceptual decision model based on the life cycle thinking (LCT) approach. The WDS from Sharjah Electricity and Water Authority (SEWA) is used as an example to illustrate the use of the model. The proposed model takes into account relevant metrics and parameters to help unify the impacts of sustainability and resilience improvements in a WDS. Improvement measures (scenarios) in the model are considered as decision alternatives. The conflicting aspects of sustainability and resilience are examined using a combination of life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle-based global resilience analysis (GRA) of the infrastructure. LCA includes the evaluation of sustainability using appropriate metrics. GRA is conducted to determine the resiliency of the WDS. Unified evaluation of both resilience and sustainability for the WDS provides the basis of a model for realistic assessment and critical decision-making. The study develops a LCT-based model to help determine the course(s) of action necessary to achieve sustainability and resilience goals, including the necessary trade-offs, while continuing to provide reliable service to consumers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Afgan, N. H., & Carvalho, M. G. (2004). Sustainability assessment of hydrogen energy systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 29(13), 1327–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali, T., Mortula, M., & Atabay, S. (2016). GIS-based study on the susceptibility of Dubai Creek (UAE) to eutrophication. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 25(6), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Tekreeti, M., & Beheiry, S. (2016). A decision matrix approach to green project management processes. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 13(3), 178–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arif, F., Bayraktar, M. E., & Ahmad, I. U. (2013). Net-zero building venture capital market: Current opportunities and emerging trends for entrepreneurial companies. Conference in Central Europe towards Sustainable Buildings (CESB13) Sustainable Buildings and Refurbishment for Next Generations, Prague, Czech Republic”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkema, A. J., Preisig, H. A., Otterpohl, R., & Lambert, F. J. D. (2002). Indicators for the sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment systems. Urban Water, 4(2), 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, R., Schluter, M., & Schoon, M. (2015). Principles for building resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bignami, D. F. (2017). Testing solutions of a multi-disaster building’s certification functional to the built environment sustainability and resilience. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 8(1), 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocchini, P., Frangopol, D. M., Ummenhofer, T., & Zinke, T. (2014). Resilience and sustainability of civil infrastructure: Toward a unified approach. Journal of Infrastructure Engineering, 20(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulos, P. F. (2017). Smart water network modeling for sustainable and resilient infrastructure. Water Resources Management, 31(10), 3177–3188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, J. T., D’Amato, V. A., & Taylor, T. M. (2010). Integrating water infrastructure in a new paradigm for sustainable, resilient communities. In proceedings of the 2010 watershed management conference (Vol. 394, pp. 966–977). Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, M., Joss, S., Schraven, D., Zhan, C., & Weijnen, M. (2015). Sustainable-smart-resilient-low carbon-eco-knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diao, K., Sweetapple, C., Farmani, R., Fu, G., Ward, S., & Butler, D. (2016). Global resilience analysis of water distribution systems. Water Research, 106, 383–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, X., Guo, H., Zeng, S. (2017). Enhancing future resilience in urban drainage system: Green versus grey infrastructure. Water Research, 124, 280-289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, R. R., & Quarantelli, E. L. (1975). Community conflict: Its absence and its presence in natural disasters. Disaster Research Center, Ohio State University: Columbus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eslamian, S., & Motevallian, S. S. (2014). Ch. 27: Sustainability in urban water system, in handbook of engineering hydrology. In S. Eslamian (Ed.), Fundamentals and applications (Vol. 1, pp. 549–562). USA: Taylor and Francis, CRC Group, Boca Raton, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattah, K. P., & Mortula, M. (2020). Leaching of organic material in polymeric pipes distributing desalinated water. International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology, 10(2), 210–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer, A. L. C., Thome, A. M. T., & Scavarda, A. J. (2018). Sustainable urban infrastructure: A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 360–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnveden, G., HJauschild, M. Z., Ekvall, T., Guinee, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., & Suh, S. (2009). Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frostell, B. (2013). Life cycle thinking for improved resource management: LCA or? In J. Kauffman & K. M. Lee (Eds.), Handbook of sustainable engineering. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8939-8_50.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gharzeldeen, M. N., & Beheiry, S. M. (2015). Investigating the use of green design parameters in UAE construction projects. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 8(2), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginley, D. S., & Cahen, D. (2012). Fundamentals of materials for energy and environmental sustainability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godchalk, D. R. (2003). Urban Hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review, 4(3), 136–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafakos, S., Gianoli, A., & Tsatsou, A. (2016). Towards the development of an integrated sustainability and resilience benefits assessment framework of urban green growth interventions. Sustainability, 8(461), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haapio, A., & Viltaniemi, P. (2008). A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28(7), 469–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajibabaei, M., Nazif, S., & Sereshgi, F. T. (2018). Life cycle assessment of pipes and piping process in drinking water distribution networks to reduce environmental impact. Sustainable Cities and Society, 43, 538–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hokstad, P., Utne, I. B., & Vatn, J. (2013). Chapters 5 and 6. In Risk and interdependencies in critical infrastructures (pp. 49–94). Springer, Springer-Verlag London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, J. (2007). Risk and vulnerability analysis of large-scale technical infrastructures: Electrical distribution systems (Doctoral dissertation). Lund University, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung D (2013) Robust and resilient water distribution systems. PhD thesis. University of Arizona, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansey, K. (2012) Sustainable, robust, resilient, water distribution systems. 14th Water Distribution Systems Analysis Conference. 24– 27 September 2012, Adelaide, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, W., Xiaolong, X., Zeyu, W., & Zhang, L. (2018). A unified assessment approach for urban infrastructure sustainability and resilience. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhoul, N. (2015, September 23–25). From sustainable to resilient and smart cities. In IABSE conference, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchese, D., Reynolds, E., Bates, M. E., Morgan, H., Clark, S. S., & Linkov, I. (2018). Resilience and sustainability: Similarities and differences in environmental management applications. Science of the Total Environment, 613–614, 1275–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniels, T., Chang, S., Cole, D., Mikawoz, J., & Longstaff, H. (2008). Fostering resilience to extreme events within infrastructure systems: Characterizing decision contexts for mitigation and adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 18(2), 310–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, F., Fu, G., Farmani, R., Sweetapply, C., & Butler, D. (2018). Topological attributes of network resilience: A study in water distribution system. Water Research, 143, 376–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihelcic, J. R., & Zimmerman, J. B. (2009). Environmental engineering: Fundamentals, sustainability, design (1st ed.). Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihyeon Jeon, C., & Amekudzi, A. (2005). Addressing sustainability in transportation systems: Definitions, indicators, and metrics. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 11(1), 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsker, B., Baldwin, L., Crittenden, J., & Kabbes, K. (2015). Progress and recommendations for advancing performance-based sustainable and resilient infrastructure design. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 141(12), A4015006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortula, M., Fattah, K. P., & Ali, T. (2016). Study the variability of water quality in a large distribution network. In 14th WASD international conference. London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortula, M., Fattah, K. P., Ali, T., Idris, A., & Albardan, M. (2019). Spatiotemporal assessment of water quality in the distribution network of City of Sharjah, UAE. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences., 11(2), 116–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortula, M., Ahmed, A., Sadri, A., Ali, T., Ahmad, I. U., & Idris, A. (2020). Improving resiliency of water supply system in arid regions: Integrating centrality and hydraulic vulnerability. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(5), 05020011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mugume, S. N., Gomez, D. E., Fu, G., Farmani, R., & Butler, D. (2015). A global analysis approach for investigating structural resilience in urban drainage systems. Water Research, 81, 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, A. (2014). Resilience of urban water systems: An ‘infrastructure ecology’ approach to sustainable and resilient (SuRe) planning and design. Dissertation Georgia Institute of Technology, US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiner, M. B., & Ramaswami, A. (2016). What is remedial secondary infrastructure? Implications for infrastructure design, policy for sustainability, and resilience. Journal of Infrastructure Engineering, Forum, 22(2), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reza, B., Sadiq, R., & Hewage, K. (2011). Sustainability assessment of flooring systems in the City of Tehran: An AHP-based life cycle analysis. Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 2053–3066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rijsberman, M. A., & Van De Ven, F. H. M. (2000). Different approaches to assessment of design and management of sustainable urban water systems. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 20(3), 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq, R., & Khan, F. I. (2006). An integrated approach for risk-based life cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision-making: Selection, design and evaluation of cleaner and greener processes. Business Process Management Journal, 12(6), 770–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahely, H. R., Kennedy, C. A., & Adams, B. J. (2005). Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 32(1), 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleem, M., Chhipi-Shrestha, G., Andrade, M. T. B., & Dyck, R. (2018). Life cycle thinking-based selection of building facades. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 24(4), 04018029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santora, M., & Wilson, R. (2008). Resilient and sustainable water infrastructure. Journal American Water Works Association, 100(12), 40–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahidehpour, M., Li, Z., & Ganji, M. (2018). Smart cities for a sustainable urbanization: Illuminating the need for establishing smart urban infrastructures. IEEE Electrification Magazine, 6(2), 16–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taborianski, V. M., & Prado, R. T. (2012). Methodology of CO2 emission evaluation in the life cycle of office building facades. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 33(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2011.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thabrew, L., Wiek, A., & Ries, R. (2009). Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: Applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(1), 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas Ng, S., Xu, F. J., Yang, Y., & Lu, M. (2017). A master data management solution to unlock the value of big infrastructure data for smart, sustainable and resilient city planning. Procedia Engineering, 196, 939–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timashev, S. A. (2017). Resilient urban infrastructures – Basics of smart sustainable cities. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 262(November 29), 012197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, K. D., Eptein, D., Varda, D., & Lane, B. (2017). Measuring performance in interagency collaboration: FEMA corps. Risk Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy, 8(3), 172–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, S., & Osmond, P. (2018). Building resilience in urban settlements. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 36(4), 334–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Thomas Ng, S., Xu, F. J., & Skitmore, M. (2018). Towards sustainable and resilient high density cities through better integration of infrastructure networks. Sustainable Cities and Society, 42, 407–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Sharjah Electricity and Water Authority (SEWA) for sharing relevant information used in this book chapter regarding the water distribution system.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Md Maruf Mortula .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mortula, M.M., Ahmad, I.U., Sadiq, R., Beheiry, S. (2021). A Conceptual Unified Model for Assessing Improvements in Sustainability and Resilience in Water Distribution Systems. In: Eslamian, S., Eslamian, F. (eds) Handbook of Disaster Risk Reduction for Resilience. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61278-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics