Skip to main content

Color Doppler and CEUS Artifacts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Imaging in Nephrology
  • 612 Accesses

Abstract

Doppler techniques (spectral Doppler, color Doppler, and power Doppler) are extensively employed in vascular and nonvascular imaging of the upper urinary tract. Contrast-enhanced, grayscale sonography (CEUS) is being increasingly used in renal imaging, particularly in some clinical scenarios. Artifacts are structures in an image that are not directly similar with the actual tissue (normal or abnormal) being scanned. Artifacts have a double-face interest, since on the one side they can be employed to help image interpretation while, on the other side, they represent pitfalls, possibly driving to incorrect diagnosis. In both cases, appropriate knowledge of artifacts is mandatory when using Doppler techniques and CEUS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bönhof JA. Ultrasound artifacts—Part 1. Ultraschall Med. 2016;37:40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bönhof JA. Ultrasound artifacts—Part 2. Ultraschall Med. 2017;38:130–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Keogh CF, Cooperberg PL. Is it real or is it an artifact. Ultrasound Q. 2001;17:201–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rubens DJ, Bhatt S, Nedelka S, Cullinan J. Doppler artifacts and pitfalls. Radiol Clin N Am. 2006;44:805–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kielar AZ, Shabana W, Vakili M, Rubin J. Prospective evaluation of Doppler sonography to detect the twinkling artifact versus unenhanced computed tomography for identifying urinary tract calculi. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:1619–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell SC, Cullinan JA, Rubens DJ. Slow flow or no flow? Color and power Doppler US pitfalls in the abdomen and pelvis. Radiographics. 2004;24:497–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Prabhu SJ, Kanal K, Bhargava P, Vaidya S, Dighe MK. Ultrasound artifacts: classification, applied physics with illustrations, and imaging appearances. Ultrasound Q. 2014;30:145–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lubas A, Wojtecka A, Smoszna J, Koziński P, Frankowska E, Niemczyk S. Hemodynamic characteristics and the occurrence of renal biopsy-related arteriovenous fistulas in native kidneys. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016;48:1667–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1411-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahmouni A, Bargoin R, Herment A, Bargoin N, Vasile N. Color Doppler twinkling artifact in hyperechoic regions. Radiology. 1996;199:269–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee JY, Kim SH, Cho JY, Han D. Color and power Doppler twinkling artifacts from urinary stones: clinical observations and phantom studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1441–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Trillaud H, Pariente JL, Rabie A, Grenier N. Detection of encrusted indwelling ureteral stents using a twinkling artifact revealed on color Doppler sonography. AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1446–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gao J, Ng A, Dang MN, Min R. Flow turbulence or twinkling artifact? A primary observation on the intrarenal color Doppler sonography. Clin Imaging. 2010;34:355–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chelfouh N, Grenier N, Higueret D, et al. Characterization of urinary calculi: in vitro study of “twinkling artifact” revealed by color-flow sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:1055–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Catalano O, Nunziata A, Altei F, Siani A. Suspected ureteral colic: primary helical CT versus selective helical CT after unenhanced radiography and sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:379–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pozniak MA, Zagzebski JA, Scanlan KA. Spectral and color Doppler artifacts. Radiographics. 1992;12:35–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Catalano O, De Sena G, Nunziata A. The color Doppler US evaluation of the ureteral jet in patients with urinary colic. Radiol Med. 1998;95:614–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Forsberg F, Liu JB, Burns PN, Merton DA, Goldberg BB. Artifacts in ultrasonic contrast agent studies. J Ultrasound Med. 1994;13:357–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Quaia E. Ultrasound of the kidney. In: Quaia E, editor. Radiological imaging of the kidney. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 83–123.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Forsberg F, Liu JB, Merton DA, Rawool NM, Goldberg BB. Parenchymal enhancement and tumor visualization using a new sonographic contrast agent. J Ultrasound Med. 1995;14:949–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pugh CR, Arger PH, Sehgal CM. Power, spectral, and color flow Doppler enhancement by a new ultrasonographic contrast agent. J Ultrasound Med. 1996;15:843–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu CY, Lo MT, Tsao J, Chu A, Chou YH, Tiu CM. Factor analysis in both spatial and temporal domains of color blooming artifacts in ultrasound investigations utilizing contrast agents. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2004;28:129–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Correas JM, Bridal L, Lesavre A, Méjean A, Claudon M, Hélénon O. Ultrasound contrast agents: properties, principles of action, tolerance, and artifacts. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1316–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Catalano O, Migaleddu V, Quaia E, Caruso G. Terminology for contrast-enhanced sonography: a practical glossary. J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26:717–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Melany ML, Grant EG, Farooki S, McElroy D, Kimme-Smith C. Effect of US contrast agents on spectral velocities: in vitro evaluation. Radiology. 1999;211:427–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ressner M, Brodin LA, Jansson T, Hoff L, Ask P, Janerot-Sjoberg B. Effects of ultrasound contrast agents on Doppler tissue velocity estimation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19:154–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bertolotto M, Catalano O. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: past, present, and future. Ultrasound Clinics. 2009;4:339–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cantisani V, Bertolotto M, Weskott HP, Romanini L, Grazhdani H, Passamonti M, Drudi FM, Malpassini F, Isidori A, Meloni FM, Calliada F, D’Ambrosio F. Growing indications for CEUS: The kidney, testis, lymph nodes, thyroid, prostate, and small bowel. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:1675–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.05.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gulati M, King KG, Gill IS, Pham V, Grant E, Duddalwar VA. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of cystic and solid renal lesions: a review. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:1982–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Setola SV, Catalano O, Sandomenico F, Siani A. Contrast-enhanced sonography of the kidney. Abdom Imaging. 2007;32:21–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Piscaglia F, Nolsøe C, Dietrich CF, Cosgrove DO, Gilja OH, Bachmann Nielsen M, Albrecht T, Barozzi L, Bertolotto M, Catalano O, Claudon M, Clevert DA, Correas JM, D’Onofrio M, Drudi FM, Eyding J, Giovannini M, Hocke M, Ignee A, Jung EM, Klauser AS, Lassau N, Leen E, Mathis G, Saftoiu A, Seidel G, Sidhu PS, ter Haar G, Timmerman D, Weskott HP. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33:33–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Greis C. Technical aspects of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations: tips and tricks. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2014;58:89–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Hocke M, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Greis C. Pitfalls and artefacts using contrast enhanced ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol. 2011;49:350–6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1245851.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Greis C, Cui XW, Schreiber-Dietrich DG, Hocke M. Artifacts and pitfalls in contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver. Ultraschall Med. 2014;35:108–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu H, Jang HJ, Kim TK, Khalili K, Williams R, Lueck G, Hudson J, Burns PN. Pseudoenhancement within the local ablation zone of hepatic tumors due to a nonlinear artifact on contrast-enhanced ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:653–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Catalano, O. (2021). Color Doppler and CEUS Artifacts. In: Granata, A., Bertolotto, M. (eds) Imaging in Nephrology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60794-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60794-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60792-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60794-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics