Skip to main content

Relying on System 1 Thinking Leaves You Susceptible to the Peril of Misinformation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems and Neuroscience (NeuroIS 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 43))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the current era of unprecedented cultural and political tension, the growing problem of misinformation has exacerbated social unrest within the online space. Rectifying this issue requires a robust understanding of the underlying factors that lead social media users to believe and spread misinformation. We investigate a set of neurophysiological measures as they relate to users interacting with misinformation, delivered via social media. A rating task, requiring participants to assess the validity of news headlines, reveals a stark contrast between their performance when engaging analytical thinking processes versus automatic thinking processes. We utilize this observation to theorize intervention methods that encourage more analytical thinking processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/.

References

  1. Guess, A.M., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J.: Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 U.S. election. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kata, A.: A postmodern pandora’s box: anti-vaccination misinformation on the internet. Vaccine. 28, 1709–1716 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Conroy, N.J., Rubin, V.L., Chen, Y.: Automatic deception detection: Methods for finding fake news. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Tech. 52, 1–4 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moravec, P., Kim, A., Dennis, A.: Flagging Fake News: System 1 vs. System 2 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arceneaux, K.: Cognitive biases and the strength of political arguments. Am. J. Political Sci. 56, 271–285 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00573.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kahneman, D.: Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar Straus and Giroux, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mathôt, S.: Pupillometry: psychology, physiology, and function. J. Cogn. 1, 16 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith, E.R., DeCoster, J.: Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson, T.D., Lindsey, S., Schooler, T.Y.: A model of dual attitudes. Psychol. Rev. 107, 101–126 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bargh, J.A., Ferguson, M.J.: Beyond behaviorism: on the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychol. Bull. 126, 925–945 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Evans, J.S.B.T., Stanovich, K.E.: Dual-process theories of higher cognition: advancing the debate. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 8, 223–241 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fiske, S.T., Taylor, S.E.: Social Cognition. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Torrens, D.: Individual differences and the belief bias effect: mental models, logical necessity, and abstract reasoning. Thinking Reasoning. 5, 1–28 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/135467899394066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kahneman, D., Peavler, W.S., Onuska, L.: Effects of verbalization and incentive on the pupil response to mental activity. Can. J. Psychol. Revue canadienne de psychologie. 22, 186–196 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0082759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams, C., Kappen, M., Hassall, C.D., Wright, B., Krigolson, O.E.: Thinking theta and alpha: mechanisms of intuitive and analytical reasoning. NeuroImage 189, 574–580 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Porter, E., Wood, T.J., Kirby, D.: Sex trafficking, Russian infiltration, birth certificates, and pedophilia: a survey experiment correcting fake news. J. Exp. Political Sci. 5, 159–164 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wood, G., Long, K.S., Feltwell, T., et al.: Rethinking engagement with online news through social and visual co-annotation. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI’18, pp. 1–12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Flintham, M., Karner, C., Bachour, K., Creswick, H., Gupta, N., Moran, S.: Falling for fake news: investigating the consumption of news via social media. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 376:1–376:10. ACM, New York (2018). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173950.

  19. Mognon, A., Jovicich, J., Bruzzone, L., Buiatti, M.: ADJUST: An automatic EEG artifact detector based on the joint use of spatial and temporal features. Psychophysiology 48, 229–240 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Polat, K., Güneş, S.: Classification of epileptiform EEG using a hybrid system based on decision tree classifier and fast Fourier transform. Appl. Math. Comput. 187, 1017–1026 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.09.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Milkman, K.L., Chugh, D., Bazerman, M.H.: How can decision making be improved? Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4, 379–383 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01142.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spencer Early .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Early, S., Mirhoseini, S., El Shamy, N., Hassanein, K. (2020). Relying on System 1 Thinking Leaves You Susceptible to the Peril of Misinformation. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, PM., Randolph, A.B., Fischer, T. (eds) Information Systems and Neuroscience. NeuroIS 2020. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60073-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60073-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60072-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60073-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics