Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Advancing NeuroIS from a Dialectical Perspective

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems and Neuroscience (NeuroIS 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 43))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1016 Accesses

Abstract

In spite of decades of research, the essence of central IS phenomena such as information, the IT artifact, and the Information System, remain unsettled. This aggravates the identification and definition of their neural correlates, which in turn may stymie the future potential of NeuroIS. To this end, the purpose of this paper is to define an intellectual core for the NeuroIS field, which is based on the dialectics between the individual and her social environment. Such a core enables a reconceptualization of information, the IT artifact, and the Information System as distinct ontological phenomena, however dialectically related. Accordingly, their neural correlates can be more distinctly defined, which opens up for alternative research questions. An example of a NeuroIS study addressing such questions is provided. Thus, the paper contributes to the formulation of a foundation for the future advancement of NeuroIS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a case in point, see e.g. [2], where “IT artefact” and “IS artefact” are interchangeably referred to.

  2. 2.

    However, the neural effects of attending and acting with a model may of course be documented by NeuroIS tools and methods.

  3. 3.

    These particular factors were identified from long-term observations of and reflections over projects developing complex telecom systems in industry [31,32].

  4. 4.

    Such mental functions need to be seen as Complex Functional Systems [23] since “no specific function is ever connected with the activity of one single brain center. It is always the product of the integral activity of strictly differentiated, hierarchically interconnected centers” [24, p. 171].

  5. 5.

    Common characterizations are “world” [e.g. 21], “environment” [e.g. 22] and the like.

References

  1. NeuroIS. https://www.neurois.org/what-is-neurois/

  2. vom Brocke, J., Hevner, A., Léger, P.M., Walla, P., Riedl, R.: Advancing a NeuroIS research agenda with four areas of societal contributions. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. (EJIS) 29(1), 9–24 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Riedl, R., Léger, P.M.: Fundamentals of NeuroIS - Information Systems and the Brain. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Boland, R.J.: The information of information systems. In: Boland, R.J., Hirschheim, R.A. (eds.) Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, pp. 363–379. John Wiley, New York (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alter, S.: The concept of ‘IT artifact’ has outlived its usefulness and should be retired now. Inf. Syst. J. 25(1), 47–60 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alter, S.: Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17(5), 448–469 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, A.S.: Retrospect and prospect: information systems research in the last and next 25 years. J. Inf. Technol. 25(4), 336–348 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2010.24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Taxén, L.: Towards reconceptualizing the core of the IS field from a neurobiological perspective. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A.B. (eds.) Information Systems and Neuroscience - Gmunden Retreat on NeuroIS 2017, pp. 201–210. Springer Cham (2018). DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67431-5_23

  9. Love, N.: Cognition and the language myth. Lang. Sci. 26(6), 525–544 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sidorova, A., Evangelopoulos, N., Valacich, J.S., Ramakrishnan, T.: Uncovering the intellectual core of the information systems discipline. MIS Q. 32(3), 467–482 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wong, W.: Understanding dialectical thinking from a cultural-historical perspective. Philos. Psychol. 19(2), 239–260 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080500462420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marx, K.: The German Ideology: Including Theses on Feuerbach and Introduction to the Critique of Political Economy. Prometheus Books, Amherst (1998) https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/index.htm. Originally published in 1845

  13. Adler, P.: The evolving object of software development. Organization 12(3), 401–435 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernstein, R.: Praxis and Action. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blumer, H.: Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Red’ko, V.G., Prokhorov, D.V., Burtsev, M.B.: Theory of functional systems, adaptive critics and neural networks. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Budapest, pp. 1787–1792 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Toomela, A.: Biological roots of foresight and mental time travel. Integr. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 44, 97–125 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Toomela, A.: Towards understanding biological, psychological and cultural mechanisms of anticipation. In: Nadin, M. (ed.) Anticipation: Learning from the Past. The Russian/Soviet Contributions to the Science of Anticipation, pp. 431–456. Springer, Cham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Clark, H.H.: Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Garfinkel, H.: Toward a Sociological Theory of Information. Paradigm Publishers, Boulder (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Knudsen, E.I.: Fundamental components of attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 57–78 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gratch, J., Marcella, S.: The architectural role of emotions in cognitive systems. In: Gray, W.D. (ed.) Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems, pp. 230–242. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Luria, A.R.: LS Vygotsky and the problem of localization of functions. Neuropsychologia 3, 387–392 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Akhutina, T.V.: LS Vygotsky and AR Luria: foundations of neuropsychology. J. Russ. East Eur. Psychol. 41(3/4), 159–190 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abend, G.: What are neural correlates neural correlates of? BioSocieties 12, 415–438 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hassan, N.R.: Constructing the right disciplinary IS questions. In: Twenty-third Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston, 2017, pp. 1–10 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. vom Brocke, J., Liang, T.P.: Guidelines for neuroscience studies in information systems research. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 30(4), 211–234 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoskin, K.: Spacing, timing and the invention of management. Organization 11(6), 743–757 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Goldkuhl, G.: The IT artefact: an ensemble of the social and the technical? – a rejoinder. Syst. Signs Actions 7(1), 90–99 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Maturana, H.R.: Biology of Cognition. BCL Report # 9.0. University of Illinois, Urbana (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Taxén, L.: A Framework for the Coordination of Complex Systems’ Development. Dissertation No. 800. Linköping University, Dep. of Computer & Information Science (2003). https://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?searchId=1&pid=diva2:20897

  32. Taxén, L.: Using Activity Domain Theory for Managing Complex Systems. Information Science Reference. Information Science Reference (IGI Global) Hershey PA. ISBN 978–1–60566–192–6 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Taxén, L.: Information systems and activity modalities – a coordination perspective on the interaction between the neural and the social. In: Gmunden Retreat on NeuroIS 2011, Gmunden, Austria, 26–28 June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  34. Taxén, L.: An investigation of model quality from the activity modality perspective. In: Gmunden Retreat on NeuroIS 2012, Gmunden, Austria, 3–6 June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  35. Taxén, L.: Reconceptualizing information systems from the activity modality perspective. In: Gmunden Retreat on NeuroIS 2013, Gmunden, Austria, 1–4 June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  36. Taxén, L.: An investigation of the nature of information systems from a neurobiological perspective. In: Davis, F., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, P.-M., Randolph, A. Information Systems and Neuroscience, Gmunden Retreat on NeuroIS 2015, pp. 27–34. Springer, Dordrecht (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18702-0

  37. Taxén, L: Reviving the individual in sociotechnical systems thinking. In: Kowalski, S., Bednar, P., Nolte, A., Bider, I. (eds.) 5th International Workshop on Socio-Technical Perspective in IS development (STPIS 2019), Stockholm, pp. 1–8, 11 June 2019. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2398/

  38. Taxén, L., and Riedl, R.: Understanding coordination in the information systems domain. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. (JITTA), 17(1), Article 2, 5–40 (2016). https://aisel.aisnet.org/jitta/vol17/iss1/2

  39. Hevner, A., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Faulkner, P., Runde, J.: Technological objects, social positions, and the transformational model of social activity. MIS Q. 37(3), 803–818 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

    Lars Taxén

Authors
  1. Lars Taxén
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars Taxén .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Information Systems and Quantitative Sciences (ISQS), Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA

    Fred D. Davis

  2. University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Steyr, Austria

    René Riedl

  3. Department of Information Systems, University of Liechtenstein, Vaduz, Liechtenstein

    Jan vom Brocke

  4. Department of Information Technology, HEC Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Pierre-Majorique Léger

  5. Department of Information Systems, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, GA, USA

    Adriane B. Randolph

  6. Department for Digital Business, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Steyr, Austria

    Thomas Fischer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Taxén, L. (2020). Advancing NeuroIS from a Dialectical Perspective. In: Davis, F.D., Riedl, R., vom Brocke, J., Léger, PM., Randolph, A.B., Fischer, T. (eds) Information Systems and Neuroscience. NeuroIS 2020. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 43. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60073-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60073-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60072-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60073-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation