Skip to main content

On Repetitiveness Measures of Thue-Morse Words

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
String Processing and Information Retrieval (SPIRE 2020)

Abstract

We show that the size \(\gamma (t_n)\) of the smallest string attractor of the n-th Thue-Morse word \(t_n\) is 4 for any \(n\ge 4\), disproving the conjecture by Mantaci et al. [ICTCS 2019] that it is n. We also show that \(\delta (t_n) = \frac{10}{3+2^{4-n}}\) for \(n \ge 3\), where \(\delta (w)\) is the maximum over all \(k = 1,\ldots ,|w|\), the number of distinct substrings of length k in w divided by k, which is a measure of repetitiveness recently studied by Kociumaka et al. [LATIN 2020]. Furthermore, we show that the number \(z(t_n)\) of factors in the self-referencing Lempel-Ziv factorization of \(t_n\) is exactly 2n.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Berstel, J., Savelli, A.: Crochemore factorization of Sturmian and other infinite words. In: Královič, R., Urzyczyn, P. (eds.) MFCS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4162, pp. 157–166. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11821069_14

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Brlek, S.: Enumeration of factors in the Thue-Morse word. Discrete Appl. Math. 24(1), 83–96 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-218X(92)90274-E

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Brlek, S., Frosini, A., Mancini, I., Pergola, E., Rinaldi, S.: Burrows-Wheeler transform of words defined by morphisms. In: Colbourn, C.J., Grossi, R., Pisanti, N. (eds.) IWOCA 2019. LNCS, vol. 11638, pp. 393–404. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25005-8_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Burrows, M., Wheeler, D.J.: A block-sorting lossless data compression algorithm. SRC Research Report 124 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charikar, M., et al.: The smallest grammar problem. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 51(7), 2554–2576 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2005.850116

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, K.T., Fox, R.H., Lyndon, R.C.: Free differential calculus, IV. The quotient groups of the lower central series. Ann. Math. 68(1), 81–95 (1958). http://www.jstor.org/stable/1970044

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Christiansen, A.R., Ettienne, M.B., Kociumaka, T., Navarro, G., Prezza, N.: Optimal-time dictionary-compressed indexes (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.12779v6

  8. I, T., Nakashima, Y., Inenaga, S., Bannai, H., Takeda, M.: Faster Lyndon factorization algorithms for SLP and LZ78 compressed text. In: Kurland, O., Lewenstein, M., Porat, E. (eds.) SPIRE 2013. LNCS, vol. 8214, pp. 174–185. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02432-5_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ido, A., Melançon, G.: Lyndon factorization of the Thue-Morse word and its relatives. Discrete Math. Theor. Comput. Sci. 1(1), 43–52 (1997). http://dmtcs.episciences.org/233

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kärkkäinen, J., Kempa, D., Nakashima, Y., Puglisi, S.J., Shur, A.M.: On the size of Lempel-Ziv and Lyndon factorizations. In: Vollmer, H., Vallée, B. (eds.) 34th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, STACS 2017. LIPIcs, Hannover, Germany, 8–11 March 2017, vol. 66, pp. 45:1–45:13. Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2017). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.STACS.2017.45

  11. Kempa, D., Prezza, N.: At the roots of dictionary compression: string attractors. In: Diakonikolas, I., Kempe, D., Henzinger, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 50th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2018), pp. 827–840. ACM (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3188745.3188814

  12. Kociumaka, T., Navarro, G., Prezza, N.: Towards a definitive measure of repetitiveness. In: Proceedings of the 14th Latin American Symposium on Theoretical Informatics (LATIN) (2020, to appear). https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.02151

  13. Lempel, A., Ziv, J.: On the complexity of finite sequences. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 22(1), 75–81 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.1976.1055501

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Mantaci, S., Restivo, A., Romana, G., Rosone, G., Sciortino, M.: String attractors and combinatorics on words. In: Proceedings of the 20th Italian Conference on Theoretical Computer Science (ICTCS 2019), pp. 57–71 (2019). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2504/paper8.pdf

  15. Mantaci, S., Restivo, A., Sciortino, M.: Burrows-Wheeler transform and Sturmian words. Inf. Process. Lett. 86(5), 241–246 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-0190(02)00512-4

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Morse, M.: Recurrent geodesics on a surface of negative curvature. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 22, 84–100 (1921)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Prouhet, E.: Mémoire sur quelques relations entre les puissances des nombres. CR Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. 133, 225 (1851)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Raskhodnikova, S., Ron, D., Rubinfeld, R., Smith, A.D.: Sublinear algorithms for approximating string compressibility. Algorithmica 65(3), 685–709 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00453-012-9618-6

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Storer, J.A., Szymanski, T.G.: Data compression via textual substitution. J. ACM 29(4), 928–951 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1145/322344.322346

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Thue, A.: Über unendliche zeichenreihen. Norske vid. Selsk. Skr. Mat. Nat. Kl. 7, 1–22 (1906)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Urabe, Y., Nakashima, Y., Inenaga, S., Bannai, H., Takeda, M.: On the size of overlapping Lempel-Ziv and Lyndon factorizations. In: 30th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching (CPM 2019), pp. 29:1–29:11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2019.29

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP18K18002 (YN), JP17H01697 (SI), JP16H02783, JP20H04141 (HB), JP18H04098 (MT), and JST PRESTO Grant Number JPMJPR1922 (SI).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hideo Bannai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kutsukake, K., Matsumoto, T., Nakashima, Y., Inenaga, S., Bannai, H., Takeda, M. (2020). On Repetitiveness Measures of Thue-Morse Words. In: Boucher, C., Thankachan, S.V. (eds) String Processing and Information Retrieval. SPIRE 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12303. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59212-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59212-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59211-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59212-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics