Skip to main content

Nursing Documentation in Digital Solutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Introduction to Nursing Informatics

Part of the book series: Health Informatics ((HI))

Abstract

Information plays a vital role in the nursing process. The information aggregated by registered nurses in a wide range of records across the breadth of practice underpins and can bring about services that will support global populations into the next decade and beyond.

Nurse leaders need to be able to translate, synthesise, interpret and manage that information into measurable outcomes. The impact of knowledgeable and enthusiastic Executive Nurses who provide and develop informatics leadership is essential to build both the art and science of nursing into the next decade.

In terms of how nursing data is captured and structured to effectively do that, no one type of clinical data will accommodate the spectrum of nursing and midwifery practice for every scenario but in determining the most appropriate type of data or combination of data types, the advantages and disadvantages of each should be considered, as well as the workflows and downstream effects of capturing data.

Much work has been completed in the last 20 years to advance thinking around the use of nursing Standardised Terminologies. The findings from the identified studies cited demonstrate benefits of using Standardised Terminologies although it is difficult to determine whether STs impact directly on patient outcomes or the time efficiency of end-users. The careful implementation, education and support of nurses and midwives to utilise STs as well as a well-designed, user-friendly EHCR system contributes to its use and the benefits derived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajami S, Bagheri-Tadi T. Barriers for adopting electronic health records (EHRs) by physicians. Acta Inform Med. 2013;21(2):129–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Global Health (APPG). Triple Impact. How developing nursing will improve health, promote gender equality and support economic growth. APPG. 2016. https://www.who.int/hrh/com-heeg/digital-APPG_triple-impact.pdf.

  • Amalberti R, Nicklin W, Braithwaite J. Preparing national health systems to cope with the impending tsunami of ageing and its associated complexities: towards more sustainable health care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(3):412–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnot-Smith J, Smith AF. Patient safety incidents involving neuromuscular blockade: analysis of the UK National Reporting and Learning System data from 2006 to 2008. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(11):1106–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arrendale D. Transcription trends: self-documentation challenges. For The Record. 2018;30(8):28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball JE, Bruynell L, Aiken LH, Sermeus W, Sloane DM, Raffert AM, et al. Post-operative mortality, missed care and nurse staffing in nine countries: a cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;78(Feb):10–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zion R, Pliskin N, Fink L. Critical success factors for adoption of electronic health record systems: literature review and prescriptive analysis. Inf Syst Manag. 2014;31(4):296–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger M. Classification, diagnosis and datasets: towards an approach for clinical psychology services and electronic records. British Pscyhological Society (BPS). 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhart-Just A, Lassen B, Schwendimann R. Representing the nursing process with nursing terminologies in electronic medical record systems: a Swiss approach. Comput Inform Nurs. 2010;28(6):345–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolous-Rødje N. Tactics for constructing visions about electronic health records (EHRs). CJC. 2019;44:1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite J, Matsuyama Y, Mannion R, Johnson J, Bates DW, Hughes C. How to do better health reform: a snapshot of change and improvement initiatives in the health systems of 30 countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(6):843–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite J, Mannion R, Matsuyama Y, Shekelle P, Whittaker S, Al-Adawi S. Accomplishing reform: successful case studies drawn from the health systems of 60 countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29(6):880–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite J, Mannion R, Matsuyama Y, Shekelle PG, Whittaker S, Al-Adawi S. Healthcare systems: future predictions for global care. Florida: CRS Press; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronnert J, Masarie C, Naeymi-Rad F, Rose E, Aldin G. Problem-centered care delivery: how Interface terminology makes standardized health information possible. J AHIMA. 2012;83(7):30–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burkosi V. Nursing leadership in the fully digital practice realm. Nurs Leadersh. 2019;32(SI):9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnel P. The introduction of electronic medical records in France: more progress during the second attempt. Health Policy. 2018;122:937–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Busack C, Daskalakis C, Rosen P. Physician and parent perspectives on psychosocial and emotional data entry in the electronic medical record in a pediatric setting. J Patient Exp. 2016;3(1):10–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bush RA, Kuelbs C, Ryu J, Jiang W, Chiang G. Structured data entry in the electronic medical record: perspectives of pediatric specialty physicians and surgeons. J Med Syst. 2017;41(5):75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne MD. Informatics competence in the EHR era. J Perianesth Nurs. 2012;27(1):42–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • California Healthcare Group. Clinical documentation: EHR deployment techniques. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion Awaad O, Hayton A, Smith L, Vuaran M. The national programme for IT in the NHS: a case history. MPhil Public Policy 2014, University of Cambridge. 2014. https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/Papers/npfit-mpp-2014-case-history.pdf.

  • Campion T, Johnson S, Paxton E, Mushlin A, Sedrakyan A. Implementing unique device identification in electronic health record systems: organizational, workflow, and technological challenges. Med Care. 2014;52(1):26–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cao J, Farmer R, Carry PM, Goodfellow M, Gerhardt DC, Scott F, et al. Standardized note templates improve electronic medical record documentation of neurovascular examinations for pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. JB JS Open Access. 2017;2(4):e0027.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cho I, Park HA. Development and evaluation of a terminology-based electronic nursing record system. J Biomed Inform. 2003;36(4-5):304–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cho I, Park HA. Evaluation of the expressiveness of an ICNP-based nursing data dictionary in a computerized nursing record system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(4):456–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Clancy TR, Delaney CW, Morrison B, Gunn JK. The benefits of standardized nursing languages in complex adaptive systems such as hospitals. J Nurs Adm. 2006;36(9):426–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke JS, Mitchell MB. The CNE-CNIO partnership: improving patient care through technology. Nurse Lead. 2014;12(1):52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Costa C, da Costa Linch G. Implementation of electronic records related to nursing diagnoses. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2018;31(1):50–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton NH, Reis S, Shachak A. Computers in the clinical encounter: a scoping review and thematic analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23(3):654–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. Sláintecare implementation strategy. Dublin, Ireland; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick TK, Patrician PA, Loan LA. The value of nursing care: a concept analysis. Nurs Forum. 2017;52(4):357–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dykes PC, Kim HE, Goldsmith DM, Choi J, Esumi K, Goldberg HS. The adequacy of ICNP version 1.0 as a representational model for electronic nursing assessment documentation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(2):238–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Englebright J, Caspers B. The role of the chief nurse executive in the big data revolution. Nurse Lead. 2016;14(4):280–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson CE, Pittman P, LaFrance A, Chapman S. Alternative payment models lead to strategic care coordination workforce investments. Nurs Outlook. 2017;65(6):737–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada NA, Dunn CR. Standardized nursing diagnoses in an electronic health record: nursing survey results. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2012;23(2):86–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fennelly O, Grogan L, Reed A, Hardiker N. Representing what we do as nurses and midwives – terminologies and standardised languages: systematic literature review and key considerations. Awating publication. 2020;

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick G, Ellingsen G. A review of 25 years of CSCW research in healthcare: contributions, challenges and future agendas. CSCW. 2013;22(4–6):609–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-012-9168-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford E, Carroll JA, Smith HE, Scott D, Cassell JA. Extracting information from the text of electronic medical records to improve case detection: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016;23(5):1007–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Founds S. Systems biology for nursing in the era of big data and precision health. Nurs Outlook. 2018;66:283–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton CR, Meek JA, Hinton Walker P. Faculty and organisational characteristics associated with informatics/health information technology adoption in DNP programs. J Prof Nursing. 2014;30(4):292–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner. Healthcare EHR and digital care delivery optimization primer for 2019. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee PM, Greenwood DA, Kim KK, Perez SL, Staggers N, De Von HA. Exploration of the e-patient phenomenon in nursing informatics. Nurs Outlook. 2012;60:E9–E16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gencbas D, Bebis H, Cicek H. Evaluation of the efficiency of the nursing care plan applied using NANDA, NOC, and NIC linkages to elderly women with incontinence living in a nursing home: a randomized controlled study. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2018;29(4):217–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes PAR, Farah BF, Rocha RS, Friedrich DBC, Dutra HS. Electronic citizen record: an instrument for nursing care. Rev Fund Care Online. 2019;11(5):1226–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green SD, Thomas JD. Interdisciplinary collaboration and the electronic medical record. Paediatr Nurs. 2008;34(3):225–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths P, Ball JE, Drennan J, Dall’Ora C, Jones J, Maruotti A, et al. Nurse staffing and patient outcomes: strengths and limitations of the evidence to inform policy and practice. A review and discussion paper based on evidence reviewed for the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Safe Staffing guideline development. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;63:213–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hakonsen SJ, Pedersen PU, Bygholm A, Peters MD, Bjerrum M. Speaking the same language: development of a nutrition minimum data set for healthcare professionals in primary healthcare. Health Informatics J. 2019;26(1):248–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458218824707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardiker N. Developing standardised terminologies to support nursing practice. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers LLC; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariyati RTS, Yani A, Eryando T, Hasibuan Z, Milanti A. The effectiveness and efficiency of nursing care documentation using the SIMPRO model. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2016;27(3):136–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Health Information and Quality Authority (HIQA). Recommendations regarding the adoption of SNOMED Clinical Terms as the Clinical Terminology for Ireland. Ireland; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgheim BI, Maia R, Ferreira JC, Martins AL. Merging data diversity of clinical medical records to improve effectiveness. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(5):769.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hellesø R. Information handling in the nursing discharge note. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15:11–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins M, Simpson RL, Johnson WG. What about big data and nursing? Am Nurse Today. 2018;13(5):29–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • HIMSS. Improving patient safety outcomes with health IT. 2019. https://www.himss.org/case-studies-improving-patient-safety-through-health-it.

  • Hine N, Petersen F, Pluke M, Sund T, editors. Standardization work on personalized eHealth systems. 30th Annual International IEEE EMBS Conference 2008; Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge CM, Narus SP. Electronic problem lists: a thematic analysis of a systematic literature review to identify aspects critical to success. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25(5):603–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Houser S, Morgan D, Clements K, Hart-Hester S. Assessing the planning and implementation strategies for the ICD-10-CM/PCS coding transition in Alabama hospital. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2013;10:1a.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • HSE. Clinical information capture in the electronic health record: literature review and key considerations. 2019. https://www.ehealthireland.ie/Strategic-Programmes/Electronic-Health-Record-EHR-/Information-Resources/Clinical-Information-Capture-in-the-EHR-Literature-Review-and-Key-Considerations.pdf.

  • Huang A, Hribar M, Goldstein I, Henriksen B, Lin W, Chiang M. Clinical documentation in electronic health record systems: analysis of similarity in progress notes from consecutive outpatient ophthalmology encounters. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018;2018:1310–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hussey P, Adams E, Shaffer FA. Nursing informatics and leadership, an essential competency for a global priority. Nurse Lead. 2015;13(5):52–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaimet K. Technology, demographics and new models of care: ready to embrace the future? Can Nurse. 2016;112(3):20–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries D, Johnson M, Nicholls D. Nursing documentation: how meaning is obscured by fragmentary language. Nurs Outlook. 2012;59(6):e6–e12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SB, Bakken S, Dine D, Hyun S, Mendonca E, Morrison F, et al. An electronic health record based on structured narrative. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15(1):54–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jones D, Lunney M, Keenan G, Moorhead S. Standardized nursing languages: essential for the nursing workforce. Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2010;28:253–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Joukes E, Cornet R, de Bruijne MC, de Keizer NF, Abu-Hanna A. Development and validation of a model for the adoption of structured and standardised data recording among healthcare professionals. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018;18(1):54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Joukes E, de Keizer NF, de Bruijne MC, Abu-Hanna A, Cornet R. Impact of electronic versus paper-based recording before EHR implementation on health care professionals’ perceptions of EHR use, data quality, and data reuse. Appl Clin Inform. 2019;10(2):199–209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jukes S, Cichero JA, Haines T, Wilson C, Paul K, O’Rourke M. Evaluation of the uptake of the Australian standardized terminology and definitions for texture modified foods and fluids. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;14(3):214–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalra D. Electronic health record standards. IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics. 2006;45:S136–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly D, Lankshear A, Jones A. Stress and resilience in a post-Francis world – a qualitative study of executive nurse directors. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(12):3160–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy MA, Moen A. Nurse leadership and informatics competencies: shaping transformation of professional practice. Forecasting informatics competencies for nurses in the future of connected health. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;232:197–206.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy-Page C, Simpson RL. Nurse leader challenges in data transparency: eyes to the future. Nurse Lead. 2016;14:271–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot KM. Intelligently managed data: achieving excellence in nursing care. Nurs Econ. 2015;33(6):342–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khokar A, Lodhi MK, Yao Y, Ansari R, Keenan G, Wilkie DJ. Framework for mining and analysis of standardized nursing care plan data. West J Nurs Res. 2017;39(1):20–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieft R, Vreeke EM, de Groot EM, de Graaf-Waar HI, van Gool CH, Koster N, et al. Mapping the Dutch SNOMED CT subset to Omaha system, NANDA international and international classification of functioning, disability and health. Int J Med Inform. 2018;111:77–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TY, Hardiker N, Coenen A. Inter-terminology mapping of nursing problems. J Biomed Inform. 2014;49:213–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KLAS. Improving the EHR experience through personalization: Impact report. UK; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Kooija J, Goossena W, Goossen-Baremansa A, de Jong-Fintelmana M, van Beeka L. Using SNOMED CT codes for coding information in electronic health records for stroke patients. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;124:815–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouroubali A, Katehakis DG. The new European interoperability framework as a facilitator of digital transformation for citizen empowerment. J Biomed Inform. 2019;94, 103166

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreimeyer K, Foster M, Pandey A, Arya N, Halford G, Jones SF, et al. Natural language processing systems for capturing and standardizing unstructured clinical information: a systematic review. J Biomed Inform. 2017;73:14–29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krumm R, Semjonow A, Tio J, Duhme H, Burkle T, Haier J, et al. The need for harmonized structured documentation and chances of secondary use - results of a systematic analysis with automated form comparison for prostate and breast cancer. J Biomed Inform. 2014;51:86–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse CS, Kristof C, Jones B, Mitchell E, Martinez A. Barriers to electronic health record adoption: a systematic literature review. J Med Syst. 2016;40(12):252.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T, Basch P, Barr M, Yackel T, Medical Informatics Committee of the American College of Physicians. Clinical documentation in the 21st century: executive summary of a policy position paper from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(4):301–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lardon J, Asfari A, Souvignet J, Trombert-Paviot B, Bousquet C. Improvement of diagnosis coding by analysing EHR and using rule engine: application to the chronic kidney disease. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:120–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence JE, Cundall-Curry D, Stewart ME, Fountain DM, Gooding CR. The use of an electronic health record system reduces errors in the National Hip Fracture Database. Age Ageing. 2018;48(2):285–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leahy-Warren P, Mulcahy H, Benefield L, Bradley C, Coffey A, Donohoe A, et al. Conceptualising a model to guide nursing and midwifery in the community guided by an evidence review. BMC Nurs. 2017;16:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary A, Tomai B, Swift A, Woodword A, Hurst K. Nurse staffing levels and outcomes – mining the UK national data sets for insight. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017;30(3):235–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linder JA, Schnipper JL, Middleton B. Method of electronic health record documentation and quality of primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(6):1019–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Liu CH, Lee TT, Mills ME. The experience if informatics nurses in Taiwan. J Prof Nurs. 2015;31(2):158–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lodhi KM, Ansari R, Yao Y, Keenan GM, Wilkie DJ, Khokhar A. A framework to predict outcome for cancer patients using data from a nursing EHR. IEEE International Conference on Big Data. 2016:3387–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lokuge S, Sedera D, Grover V, Xu D. Organizational readiness for digital innovation: development and empirical calibration of a construct. Inf Manag. 2018:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.09.001.

  • Lorenzetti DL, Quan H, Lucyk K, Cunningham C, Hennessy D, Jiang J, et al. Strategies for improving physician documentation in the emergency department: a systematic review. BMC Emerg Med. 2018;18(1):36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Loui RP, Hollinshead A. Efficient population of structured data forms for medical records using syntactic constraints and intermediate text. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), 2016. p. 317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macieira T, Smith M, Davis N, Yao Y, Wilkie D, Dunn Lopez K, et al. Evidence of progress in making nursing practice visible using standardized nursing data: a systematic review. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017:1205–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maeung D, Davis D, Tomcavage J, Graf T, Procopio K. Improving patient experience by transforming primary care: evidence from Geisinger’s patient-centred medical homes. Pop Health Manag. 2013;16(3):157–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin KS, Monsen KA, Bowles KH. The Omaha system and meaningful use: applications for practice, education, and research. Comput Inform Nurs. 2011;29(1):52–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason DJ, Jones DA, Roy C, Sullivan CG, Woods LJ. Commonalities of nurse-designed models of health care. Nurs Outlook. 2015;63(5):540–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McBrien KA, Souri S, Symonds NE, Rouhi A, Lethebe BC, Williamson TS, et al. Identification of validated case definitions for medical conditions used in primary care electronic medical record databases: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018;25(11):1567–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McMurray A, Ward L, Johnson K, Yang L, Connor M. The primary health care nurse of the future: preliminary evaluation of the nurse navigator role in integrated care. Collegian. 2018;25:517–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta R, Radhakrishnan NS, Warring CD, Jain A, Fuentes J, Dolganiuc A, et al. The use of evidence-based, problem-oriented templates as a clinical decision support in an inpatient electronic health record system. Appl Clin Inform. 2016;7(3):790–802.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Monsen K, Melton-Meaux G, Timm J, Westra B, Kerr M, Raman N, et al. An empiric analysis of Omaha system targets. Appl Clin Inform. 2011;2(3):317–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Morais SC, da Nobrega MM, de Carvalho EC. Convergence, divergence and diagnostic accuracy in the light of two nursing terminologies. Rev Bras Enferm. 2015;68(6):1086–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Staub M. Preparing nurses to use standardized nursing language in the electronic health record. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;146:337–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Staub M, Needham I, Odenbreit M, Lavin MA, van Achterberg T. Improved quality of nursing documentation: results of a nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes implementation study. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2007;18(1):5–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Staub M, Needham I, Odenbreit M, Lavin MA, van Achterberg T. Implementing nursing diagnostics effectively: cluster randomized trial. Journal of Advanced Nursing (Wiley-Blackwell). 2008;63(3):291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy S, Mc Mullin R, Brennan S, Meehan TC. Exploring implementation of the careful nursing philosophy and professional practice model© in hospital-based practice. J Nurs Manag. 2018;26(3):263–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray T, Berberian L. The importance of structured data elements in EHRs: Computer World; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Brantley HV, Ford D, Miller KL, Bott MJ. Nurse executives leading change to improve critical access hospital outcomes: a literature review with research-informed recommendations. Online J Rural Nurs Health Care. 2018;18(1):148–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen L, Bellucci E, Nguyen LT. Electronic health records implementation: an evaluation of information system impact and contingency factors. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(11):779–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nursing and Midwifery Board Ireland. Code of professional conduct and ethics. Dublin: NMBI; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nursing and Midwifery Council. The Code: Professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses, midwives and nursing associates. London: NMC; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermeyer Z, Emanuel EJ. Predicting the future – big data, machine learning, and clinical medicine. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(13):1216–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell A, Kaner E, Shaw C, Haighton C. Primary care physicians’ attitudes to the adoption of electronic medical records: a systematic review and evidence synthesis using the clinical adoption framework. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018;18(1):101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Oreofe A, Oyenike A. Transforming practice through nursing innovative patient centered care: standardized nursing languages. Int J Caring Sci. 2018;11(2):1319–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parent C. How EHRs can give time back to docs. Health Management Technology. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plastiras P, O’Sullivan D. Exchanging personal health data with electronic health records: a standardized information model for patient generated health data and observations of daily living. Int J Med Inform. 2018;120:116–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pomares-Quimbaya A, Kreuzthaler M, Schulz S. Current approaches to identify sections within clinical narratives from electronic health records: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Prideaux A. Issues in nursing documentation and record-keeping practice. Br J Nurs. 2011;20(22):1450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reid Ponte P, Somerville JG, Adams JM. Assuring the capture of standardized nursing data: a call to action for chief nursing officers. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2016;27(3):127–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remus S. The big data revolution: opportunities for chief nurse executives. Nurs Leadersh. 2016;28(4):18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi W, Boccia S. New challenges of public health: bringing the future of personalised healthcare into focus. Eur J Pub Health. 2017;27(4):36–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers ML, Sockolow PS, Bowles KH, Hand KE, George J. Use of a human factors approach to uncover informatics needs of nurses in documentation of care. Int J of Med Inform. 2013;82:1068–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom ST, Miller RA, Johnson KB, Elkin PL, Brown SH. Interface terminologies: facilitating direct entry of clinical data into electronic health record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(3):277–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom ST, Denny JC, Xu H, Lorenzi N, Stead WW, Johnson KB. Data from clinical notes: a perspective on the tension between structure and flexible documentation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(2):181–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom ST, Miller RA, Adams P, Madani S, Khan N, Shultz EK. Implementing an interface terminology for structured clinical documentation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(e1):e178–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Saranto K, Kinnunen UM, Kivekas E, Lappalainen AM, Liljamo P, Rajalahti E, Hyppönen H. Impacts of structuring nursing records: a systematic review. Scand J Caring Sci. 2014;28(4):629–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seidling H, Bates D. Evaluating the impact of health IT on medication safety. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;222:195–205.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shachak A, Montgomery C, Dow R, Barnsley J, Tu K, Jadad AR, et al. End-user support for primary care electronic medical records: a qualitative case study of users’ needs, expectations and realities. Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2013;2(3):198–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheerin F. NANDA and NIC: mediators to describe Irish intellectual disability nursing. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2003;14:22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegler EL, Adelman R. Copy and paste: a remediable hazard of electronic health records. Am J Med. 2009;122(6):495–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson RL. Chief nurse executives need contemporary informatics competencies. Nurs Econ. 2013;31(6):277–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SNOMED International. SNOMED CT starter guide. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • SNOMED International. SNOMED International: leading healthcare terminology worldwide 2019. http://www.snomed.org/.

  • Sohn S, Wang Y, Wi CI, Krusemark EA, Ryu E, Ali MH, et al. Clinical documentation variations and NLP system portability: a case study in asthma birth cohorts across institutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;25(3):353–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Staggers N, Clark L, Blaz JW, Kasandoy S. Nurses’ information management and use of electronic tools during acute care handoffs. West J Nurs Res. 2011;34(2):153–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staggers N, Elias BL, Makar E, Alexander GL. The imperative of solving nurses’ usability problems with health information technology. J Nurs Adm. 2018;48(4):191–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sundling KE, Kurtycz DFI. Standardized terminology systems in cytopathology. Diagn Cytopathol. 2019;47(1):53–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tastan S, Linch GC, Keenan GM, Stifter J, McKinney D, Fahey L, et al. Evidence for the existing American Nurses Association-recognized standardized nursing terminologies: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014;51(8):1160–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tayyib N, Coyer F, Lewis PA. A two-arm cluster randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness of a pressure ulcer prevention bundle for critically ill patients. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015;47(3):237–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Standard nursing terminologies: a landscape analysis. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas-Hawkins C, Flynn L, Dillon J. Registered nurse staffing, workload and nursing care left undone, and their relationships to patient safety in hemodialysis units. Neph Nurs J. 2020;47(2):133–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topaz M, Golfenshtein N, Bowles KH. The Omaha system: a systematic review of the recent literature. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(1):163–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vivanti A, Lewis J, O’Sullivan TA. The nutrition care process terminology: changes in perceptions, attitudes, knowledge and implementation amongst Australian dietitians after three years. Nutr Diet. 2018;75(1):87–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vuokko R, Makela-Bengs P, Hypponen H, Lindqvist M, Doupi P. Impacts of structuring the electronic health record: results of a systematic literature review from the perspective of secondary use of patient data. Int J Med Inform. 2017;97:293–303.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren JJ, Matney SA, Foster ED, Auld VA, Roy SL. Toward interoperability: a new resource to support nursing terminology standards. Comput Inform Nurs. 2015;33(12):515–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weis JM, Levy PC. Copy, paste, and cloned notes in electronic health records. Chest. 2014;145(3):632–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welton JM, Harper EM. Measuring nursing care value. Nurs Econ. 2016;34(1):7–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westra BL, Delaney CW, Konicek D, Keenan G. Nursing standards to support the electronic health record. Nurs Outlook. 2008;56(5):258–66.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westra BL, Oancea C, Savik K, Marek KD. The feasibility of integrating the Omaha system data across home care agencies and vendors. Comput Inform Nurs. 2010;28(3):162–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Westra B, Sylvia M, Weinfurter EF, Pruinelli L, Park J-I, Dodd D, et al. Big data science: a literature review of nursing research exemplars. Nurs Outlook. 2017;65:549–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbanks BA, Berner ES, Alexander GL, Azuero A, Patrician PA, Moss JA. The effect of data-entry template design and anesthesia provider workload on documentation accuracy, documentation efficiency, and user-satisfaction. Int J Med Inform. 2018;118:29–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams R, Kontopantelis E, Buchan I, Peek N. Clinical code set engineering for reusing EHR data for research: a review. J Biomed Inform. 2017;70:1–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood S. Effective record-keeping. Pract Nurse. 2010;39(4):20–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation. Global strategic directions for strengthening nursing and midwifery 2016–2020. Geneva, WHO. 2016a.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organisation. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems 10th revision (ICD-10)-WHO version. 2016b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrenn JO, Stein DM, Bakken S, Stetson PD. Quantifying clinical narrative redundancy in an electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(1):49–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wuryanto E, Rahayu GR, Emilia O, Harsono, APR O. Application of an outcome present test-peer learning model to improve clinical reasoning of nursing students in the intensive care unit. Ann Trop Med Public Health. 2017;10(3):657–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zanaboni P, Ngangue P, Mbemba GIC, Schopf TR, Bergmo TS, Gagnon MP. Methods to evaluate the effects of internet-based digital health interventions for citizens: systematic review of reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(6):e10202. https://doi.org/10.2196/10202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zaworsky D, Bower K. Care coordination: using the present to transform the future. Nurse Lead. 2016;2016:324–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Xing FM, Li CZ, Wang FL, Zhang XL. Effects of a nurse-led transitional care programme on readmission, self-efficacy to implement health-promoting behaviours, functional status and life quality among Chinese patients with coronary artery disease: a randomised controlled trial. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(5-6):969–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, Burgess ER, Reddy MC, Rothrock NE, Bhatt S, Rasmussen LV, et al. Provider perspectives on the integration of patient-reported outcomes in an electronic health record. JAMIA Open. 2019;2(1):73–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Loretto Grogan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

7.1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Data 1

Educational Template (PPTX 50 kb)

Glossary

ABC

Billing Codes

CCC

Clinical Care Classification

CDS

Clinical Decision Support

EHCR

Electronic Health Care Record

HCP

Health Care Professional

ICD

International Classification of Diseases

ICNP

International Classification for Nursing Practice

ICPC

International Classification of Primary Care

IoT

Internet of Things

LOINC

Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes

NANDA

North American Nursing Diagnosis Association

NANDA I

North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International

NIC

Nursing Intervention Classification

NLP

Natural Language Processing

NOC

Nursing Outcome Classification

OPCS

Office of Population Censuses and Surveys Classification of Interventions and Procedures

PNDS

Peri Operative Nursing Dataset

SDH

Social Determinants of Health

SNOMED CT

Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine—Clinical Terms

ST

Standardised Terminologies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Grogan, L., Reed, A., Fennelly, O. (2021). Nursing Documentation in Digital Solutions. In: Hussey, P., Kennedy, M.A. (eds) Introduction to Nursing Informatics. Health Informatics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58740-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58740-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58739-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58740-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics