Skip to main content

A Critique of Combining Tillage Practices and Nitrogen for Enhanced Maize Production on a Humic Nitisol in Kenya

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Just Enough Nitrogen

Abstract

A study was carried out in the short rainy season of 2012/2013 and the long rainy season of 2013 to compare the effects of a combination of two tillage practices and three fertilizer levels on maize production in a warm and wet environment of Kabete in Kenya. This was part of a larger experiment to test water use efficiency and viability of various climate adaptation strategies in east and southern Africa. The trial consisted of a split-plot design experiment of conventional tillage (CT) and tied ridges (TR) as main plots and three fertilizer levels of 0, 20 and 40 kg nitrogen (N) ha−1 as sub-plots. Air-dried grain harvested at physiological maturity was separated from the cob and comparative analysis done of the grain yields under the various fertility rates, tillage categories and their combinations. In the short rains of 2012–2013, TR had higher grain yield compared to CT across all the N levels, while in the long rains of 2013 the reverse was found. In 2012–2013, increasing fertilizer from 0 to 20 kg N ha−1 increased the yields by 20.9%, but increasing from 20 to 40 kg N ha−1 decreased yields by 4.9% across both the tillage categories. In the long rains of 2013, the reductions of the yields were 0.09% and 10.3% for the respective fertilizer increments. Under CT, increasing fertilizer from 0 to 20 kg N ha−1 increased the yields by 56.2%, but increasing from 20 to 40 kg N ha−1 reduced it by 8.0% in 2012–2013, while in the long rains of 2013 the yields were reduced by 8.2% and by 2.7% for the respective fertilizer increments. Under TR, increasing fertilizer from 0 to 20 kg N ha−1 increased yields by 0.08% and by 0.03% for 20 to 40 kg N ha−1 in 2012–2013, while in 2013 the increment was by 15.1% for the first fertilizer increment but a reduction by 23.6% for the second fertilizer treatment. Neither of the two tested tillage practices, fertilizer levels, nor their interactions, however, gave any significant grain yield difference at p < 0.05 for both seasons. Since TR is more labor intensive than CT, the later would be preferable and convenient for farmers in the agro-climatic conditions similar to those at the experimental site, whereas fertilizer application should be based on better understanding of the initial soil fertility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bochiolo, D., Nana, E., & Soncini, A. (2013). Impact of climate scenarios on crop yields and water footprints of maize in the Po valley, Italy. Agricultural Water Management, 116, 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calzadilla, A., Zhu, T., Rehdanz, K., Tol, R.S.J., & Ringler, C. (2009). Economy wide impacts of climate change on agriculture in sub Saharan Africa. IFPRI Research Brief 15–15. Washington DC, USA: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Kapos, V., Scharlemann, J.P.S., Bubb, P., Chenery, A., Coad, L., Dickson, B., Donswald, N., Khan, M.S.I., Kershaw, F., & Rashid, M. (2009). Review of literature on the links between biodiversity and climate change: Impacts, Adaptation and mitigation. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, Technical Series No. 42. Montreal, Canada: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deressa, T.T., Hassan, R.M., Ringler, C. Alemu, T., & Yesuf, M. (2008). Analysis of the determinants of farmers’ choices of adaptation. Methods and perceptions of climate change in the Nile basin of Ethiopia. IFPRI Discussion paper. Washington DC: IFPRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewbank, R. (2012). Forecasts benefit farmers at risk from weather extremes. Feature article, Climate and Development Knowledge Network. Available at: https://cdkn.org/2012/12/features-forecasts-benefit-farmers-at-risk-from-weather-extremes/?loclang=en_gb. Accessed July 2019.

  • Gichangi, E. M., Njiru, E. N., Itabari, J. M., Wambua, J. M., Wambua, J. N., & Karuku, A. (2007). Assessment of improved soil fertility and water harvesting technologies through community based on-farm trials in the ASALs of Kenya. In A. Batiano, B. Waswa, J. Kihara, & J. Kimetu (Eds.), Advances in integrated soil fertility management in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 759–765). Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itabari, J.K., Nguluu, S.N., Gichangi, E.M., Karuku, A.M., Njiru, E.N., Wambua, J.M., Maina, J.N., & Gachimbi, L.N. (2004). Managing land and water resources for sustainable crop production in dry areas. A case study of small-scale farms in semi-arid areas of eastern, central, and rift valley provinces of Kenya. In: Crissman, L. (Ed.) Agricultural research and development for sustainable resource management and food security in Kenya. Proceedings of end of Programme Conference, KARI, 11–12 November 2003 (pp. 31–42).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaetzold, R., & Schmidt, H. (1983). Farm management handbook of Kenya. Vol. II—Natural conditions and farm management information. Part II/B: Central Kenya. 2nd Edition. Kenya: Ministry of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karuku, G. N., Gachene, C. K. K., Karanja, N., Cornelis, W., Verplancke, H., & Kironchi, G. (2012). Soil hydraulic properties of a nitisol in Kabete, Kenya. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 15, 595–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kathuli, P., & Itabari, J.K. (2010). In-situ soil moisture conservation: utilization and management of rainwater for crop production in the arid and semi-arid lands of Kenya. KARI-Katumani, Box 340–90100, Machakos (Internal communication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenya Meteorological Department. (1983). Climatological statistics for Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenya Meteorological Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miriti, J. M. G., Kironchi, G., Esilaba, A. O., Heng, L. K., Gachene, C. K. K., & Mwangi, D. M. (2012). Yield and water use efficiencies for maize and cowpeas as affected by tillage and cropping systems in semi-arid eastern Kenya. Agricultural Water Management, 115, 148–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J., & Hansen, C. E. (Eds.). (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sijali, V.I., & Kamoni, P.T. (2005). Optimization of water and nutrient use in rain-fed semi-arid farming through integrated soil-water-nutrient management practices. In Nutrient and water management practices for increasing crop production in arid/semi-arid areas. Proceedings of a Coordinated Research Projects. IAEA TECDOC-1468 (pp. 209–216). Vienna, Austria: IAEA Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Ardenne-van der Hoeven, A., Benn, H., Brown, M.M., Chino, T.., Johnson, D.J., Kabbaj, O., Nielson, P., Töpfer, K., Wieizorel-Zeul, H., & Zhang, S. (2002). Poverty and climate change: Reducing vulnerability of the poor through adaptation. Report delivered to the 8th Conference of the UNFCC in New Delhi. Collaboration report by Asian Development Bank, DFID, Governments of Netherlands and Germany, EU, OECD, UNDP, UNEP and World Bank. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge project funding provided by the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development of Germany and the conducive working environment provided by the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, the former Kenya Agricultural Research Institute (currently the Kenyan Agriculture and Livestock Research Organization) and University of Nairobi Kabete campus field office. The assistance of Kenneth Mungai and Phillip Ikholi during data collection is also greatly acknowledged. Dr Cargele Masso also gave invaluable comments which are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. W. Onyango .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Onyango, J.W., Esilaba, A.O., Rao, K.P.C., Kathuli, P. (2020). A Critique of Combining Tillage Practices and Nitrogen for Enhanced Maize Production on a Humic Nitisol in Kenya. In: Sutton, M.A., et al. Just Enough Nitrogen. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58065-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics