Abstract
Use of simulation in undergraduate EM education is prominent and multifaceted. It can be used to teach clinical and procedural skills as well as teamwork and communication. Simulation can be a tool for student assessment and an aid in maintaining compliance with Liaison Committee on Medication Education (LCME) standards. Design and maintenance of a simulation program requires significant departmental and institutional resources, the availability of which will differ between institutions. In addition to physical and personnel resources, simulation involves a significant time commitment for both students and teaching faculty. By considering how simulation best integrates with their program’s curricular objectives and assessment needs, and balancing this against resource requirements and availability, educators can tailor simulation programs that are effective and sustainable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Accreditation standards. Available at http://www.lcme.org/. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
Passiment M, Sacks H, Huang G. Medical simulation in medical education: result of an AAMC survey: September 2011. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2011. p. 42.
Khandelwal S, et al. State of undergraduate education in emergency medicine: a national survey of clerkship directors. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(1):92–5.
Heitz C, et al. Simulation in medical student education: survey of clerkship directors in emergency medicine. West J Emerg Med. 2011;12(4):455–60.
Takayesu JK, et al. How do clinical clerkship students experience simulator-based teaching? A qualitative analysis. Simul Healthc. 2006;1(4):215–9.
Nguyen HB, et al. An educational course including medical simulation for early goal-directed therapy and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: an evaluation for medical student training. Resuscitation. 2009;80(6):674–9.
McCoy CE, et al. Prospective randomized crossover study of simulation vs. didactics for teaching medical students the assessment and management of critically ill patients. J Emerg Med. 2011;40(4):448–55.
Ten Eyck RP, et al. Improved fourth-year medical student clinical decision-making performance as a resuscitation team leader after a simulation-based curriculum. Simul Healthc. 2010;5(3):139–45.
Ten Eyck RP, Tews M, Ballester JM. Improved medical student satisfaction and test performance with a simulation-based emergency medicine curriculum: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(5):684–91.
Steadman RH, et al. Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(1):151–7.
Franc-Law JM, et al. The effectiveness of training with an emergency department simulator on medical student performance in a simulated disaster. CJEM. 2010;12(1):27–32.
Gordon JA, et al. A randomized controlled trial of simulation-based teaching versus traditional instruction in medicine: a pilot study among clinical medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006;11(1):33–9.
Schwartz LR, et al. A randomized comparison trial of case-based learning versus human patient simulation in medical student education. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(2):130–7.
Cook DA. How much evidence does it take? A cumulative meta-analysis of outcomes of simulation-based education. Med Educ. 2014;48:750–60.
Manthey DE, Ander DA, Gordon DC, Morrissey T, Sherman SC, Smith MD, Rimple D, Thibodeau LG. Emergency medicine clerkship curriculum: an update and revision. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(6):638–43.
Tews MC, et al. Developing a third-year emergency medicine medical student curriculum: a syllabus of content. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(Suppl 2):S36–40.
Tews MC, et al. Implementing a third-year emergency medicine medical student curriculum. J Emerg Med. 2015;48(6):732–743 e8.
Lamba S, et al. Structured communication: teaching delivery of difficult news with simulated resuscitations in an emergency medicine clerkship. West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(2):344–52.
Sperling JD, Clark S, Kang Y. Teaching medical students a clinical approach to altered mental status: simulation enhances traditional curriculum. Med Educ Online. 2013;18:1–8.
Motola I, et al. Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Med Teach. 2013;35(10):e1511–30.
O’Regan S, Molloy E, Watterson L, Nestel D. Observer roles that optimize learning in healthcare simulation education: a systematic review. Adv Simul. 2016;1(4):1–10.
Alessi SM. Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations. J Comput Based Instr. 1988;15(2):40–7.
Norman G, Dore K, Grierson L. The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Med Educ. 2012;46(7):636–47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ander, D.S., Wallenstein, J., Bryant, A., Fugate, K. (2021). Simulation in Undergraduate Medical Education. In: Strother, C., Okuda, Y., Wong, N., McLaughlin, S. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Emergency Medicine. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57367-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57367-6_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57365-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57367-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)