Skip to main content

Simulation in Undergraduate Medical Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Emergency Medicine

Part of the book series: Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation ((CHS))

  • 688 Accesses

Abstract

Use of simulation in undergraduate EM education is prominent and multifaceted. It can be used to teach clinical and procedural skills as well as teamwork and communication. Simulation can be a tool for student assessment and an aid in maintaining compliance with Liaison Committee on Medication Education (LCME) standards. Design and maintenance of a simulation program requires significant departmental and institutional resources, the availability of which will differ between institutions. In addition to physical and personnel resources, simulation involves a significant time commitment for both students and teaching faculty. By considering how simulation best integrates with their program’s curricular objectives and assessment needs, and balancing this against resource requirements and availability, educators can tailor simulation programs that are effective and sustainable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Accreditation standards. Available at http://www.lcme.org/. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.

  2. Passiment M, Sacks H, Huang G. Medical simulation in medical education: result of an AAMC survey: September 2011. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2011. p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Khandelwal S, et al. State of undergraduate education in emergency medicine: a national survey of clerkship directors. Acad Emerg Med. 2014;21(1):92–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heitz C, et al. Simulation in medical student education: survey of clerkship directors in emergency medicine. West J Emerg Med. 2011;12(4):455–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Takayesu JK, et al. How do clinical clerkship students experience simulator-based teaching? A qualitative analysis. Simul Healthc. 2006;1(4):215–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen HB, et al. An educational course including medical simulation for early goal-directed therapy and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: an evaluation for medical student training. Resuscitation. 2009;80(6):674–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McCoy CE, et al. Prospective randomized crossover study of simulation vs. didactics for teaching medical students the assessment and management of critically ill patients. J Emerg Med. 2011;40(4):448–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ten Eyck RP, et al. Improved fourth-year medical student clinical decision-making performance as a resuscitation team leader after a simulation-based curriculum. Simul Healthc. 2010;5(3):139–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ten Eyck RP, Tews M, Ballester JM. Improved medical student satisfaction and test performance with a simulation-based emergency medicine curriculum: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;54(5):684–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Steadman RH, et al. Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(1):151–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Franc-Law JM, et al. The effectiveness of training with an emergency department simulator on medical student performance in a simulated disaster. CJEM. 2010;12(1):27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon JA, et al. A randomized controlled trial of simulation-based teaching versus traditional instruction in medicine: a pilot study among clinical medical students. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2006;11(1):33–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwartz LR, et al. A randomized comparison trial of case-based learning versus human patient simulation in medical student education. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(2):130–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cook DA. How much evidence does it take? A cumulative meta-analysis of outcomes of simulation-based education. Med Educ. 2014;48:750–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Manthey DE, Ander DA, Gordon DC, Morrissey T, Sherman SC, Smith MD, Rimple D, Thibodeau LG. Emergency medicine clerkship curriculum: an update and revision. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(6):638–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tews MC, et al. Developing a third-year emergency medicine medical student curriculum: a syllabus of content. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18(Suppl 2):S36–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tews MC, et al. Implementing a third-year emergency medicine medical student curriculum. J Emerg Med. 2015;48(6):732–743 e8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lamba S, et al. Structured communication: teaching delivery of difficult news with simulated resuscitations in an emergency medicine clerkship. West J Emerg Med. 2015;16(2):344–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sperling JD, Clark S, Kang Y. Teaching medical students a clinical approach to altered mental status: simulation enhances traditional curriculum. Med Educ Online. 2013;18:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Motola I, et al. Simulation in healthcare education: a best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Med Teach. 2013;35(10):e1511–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Regan S, Molloy E, Watterson L, Nestel D. Observer roles that optimize learning in healthcare simulation education: a systematic review. Adv Simul. 2016;1(4):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Alessi SM. Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations. J Comput Based Instr. 1988;15(2):40–7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Norman G, Dore K, Grierson L. The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Med Educ. 2012;46(7):636–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Douglas S. Ander .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ander, D.S., Wallenstein, J., Bryant, A., Fugate, K. (2021). Simulation in Undergraduate Medical Education. In: Strother, C., Okuda, Y., Wong, N., McLaughlin, S. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Emergency Medicine. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57367-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57367-6_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57365-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57367-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics